By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!Would you have taken Sumlin? He had, basically, the same record as Herman at UH.Would take him in a New York minute.
And I will be pissed if we lose our chance to get him.
Herman said in the interview that the dead period didn't start until midnight the night they spoke (Sunday Dec 13). It would not have been a recruiting violation even if they had met."At the end of it all the only fact that was in dispute was that Lopez wrote that the meeting took place in Houston - it turns out the meeting actually happened over the phone."
But that is the very crux of the matter. An in face meeting would have been illegal in the dead period or while he was still on A&M's roster.
Yeah, Herman is splitting hairs over nonsense.OK that makes sense. I did not actually hear the interview myself.
I'm thinking Hermann should simply have ignored the whole matter rather than get in a pissing contest with someone like Lopez.
Except Mack did it behind closed doors. It didn't make himself look bad on the radio.Seems like Tommy has a bit of Mack Brown in him.
Exactly. Once you make a splash as he has in the 2015 season, it's a whole different ballgame from here on. Especially if you're on a path to a major (Power 5) program.Here is the interview. Wow, Herman comes across as a jerk. I understand his anger with having to deal with the aggie John Lopez, but he's making a mountain out our of a molehill. He makes Lopez sound reasonable.
Hoping Herman learns from this before he goes to a major program.
No, I would not have taken Sumlin or Briles.Would you have taken Sumlin? He had, basically, the same record as Herman at UH.
How about Briles? He did too.
Briles, yes. Sumlin, hell no.No, I would not have taken Sumlin or Briles.
Just listened to it...all I have to say is...Wow.IMO, the radio interview raised the reddest of flags.
Just remember the old saying "If it looks to be too good to be true, it's probably not true".