Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

RE: Rick Barnes

Nope, Patterson is terrible. It's what happens when you "money whip" people into positions. You buy complacency instead of making him earn it through performance. Shit, we nearly tripled his salary at ASI (I think). 
Where is Randy Duke with his analysis on this hoops situation. He's a big fan of Patterson's.

 
Wasn't Patterson the GM at Portland when they pick Greg Oden over Kevin Durant? If so, I would never say he was a basketball guru.
He didn't draft Oden, he would have drafted KD and it would have been the best decision he ever made. He was overridden by people at Vulcan, Paul Allen's investment arm. Patterson was never in charge. Some insiders say he is well respected in the NBA but that goes opposite of what Vulcan people say about him. He flat out couldn't make decisions, something that is being shown right now. So they made them for him and showed him the door.
Maybe Patterson is waiting for April 1, when Barnes' buyout drops to 1.5 from 1.75?

 
Probably didn't have to involve two committees, either. We put together committes to fire and hire someone so that the decision can't be put on someone's head. Chickenshit move by Bellmont. Hire someone to make decisions, what the hell are you paying him for?
Completely different situations. Tennessee had to fire Tyndall because the NCAA was coming after him.  

 
Total BS. Either fire him or keep him. This ultimatum shit is cowardly.

Firing assistants isn't going to fix the problem. 

 
Wasn't Patterson the GM at Portland when they pick Greg Oden over Kevin Durant? If so, I would never say he was a basketball guru.
The Patterson in Portland story is a really long one.  That franchise had all sorts of issues -- most people remember the "Jail Blazers," but the team had serious financial issues as well.  He got the team over those issues (I think the Rose Garden had to file bankruptcy).  But once he got them through that, I agree, he made a mistake on Ogden over Durant.  I would say, in the grand total, his results in Portland were mixed.

Here is a partial accounting of all he had to deal with there http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/22/sports/pro-basketball-in-portland-toast-of-the-town-goes-belly-up.html?pagewanted=2

 
Yes, I am pretty disappointed in Steve over this

Coming in, I had questions whether he could get football turned around

But I was pretty confident he was on top of the basketball side

Appears that assumption was incorrect
We did get a disco ball and fireworks during player intro.
 
We did get a disco ball and fireworks during player intro.

At this moment in time, Patterson just seems like another version of Dodds.

His primary concern is revenues.  Winning is secondary.

As I admitted above, I hoped for (even expected) more from him.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
We did get a disco ball and fireworks during player intro.
Don't forget the DJ!

disc-jockey.gif


 
Completely different situations. Tennessee had to fire Tyndall because the NCAA was coming after him.
That's why they fired him, doesn't take a committee to prove wrong was done. Think they'll have a committee to hire one or do you think the AD will earn his money and decide on his own?
Doesn't change my thoughts on "our process". There are pluses and minuses when it comes to hiring by committee. The biggest minus is there is never a consensus and when blame is placed (after a bad hire) it's dispersed among the committee. It's a way for a bad AD to get around doing his job. Be a man, make a decision. It's what your paid the big bucks for.

 
That's why they fired him, doesn't take a committee to prove wrong was done. Think they'll have a committee to hire one or do you think the AD will earn his money and decide on his own?

Doesn't change my thoughts on "our process". There are pluses and minuses when it comes to hiring by committee. The biggest minus is there is never a consensus and when blame is placed (after a bad hire) it's dispersed among the committee. It's a way for a bad AD to get around doing his job. Be a man, make a decision. It's what your paid the big bucks for.
My understanding is that the Tyndall hiring was pretty much a decision made by Hart (the AD at Tennessee). 

I think there are advantages and disadvantages to having a committee. 

At the end of the day, I bet Tennessee wishes they hired a committee during the Tyndall process. No way Tyndall would have been approved by a committee with his NCAA problems. 

I'm not sure Hart will hire a committee but I would bet more people are involved in the process after the Tyndall fiasco. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I sincerely hope Barnes lands at a good program like Tennessee.

He's not a bad guy and was a very good coach for us for many years. But we've stagnated and he may not be the guy to get us over the hump. We need new blood and enthusiasm to pay for a new arena. With luck, Patterson won't screw up this hire!

 
I sincerely hope Barnes lands at a good program like Tennessee.

He's not a bad guy and was a very good coach for us for many years. But we've stagnated and he may not be the guy to get us over the hump. We need new blood and enthusiasm to pay for a new arena. With luck, Patterson won't screw up this hire!
agree with all of this.
 
I don't think it was coincidental that this supposed "ultimatum" to Barnes was released literally right as Gregg Marshall's season was coming to an end. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom