Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

Dominick Wood-Anderson De-Commits

LOL! We may have to rehash the QB situation tho RickyFlair.  As a matter of fact, I started a post. about it.  Our starter has a concussion.  Our backup and previous starter is wearing a walking boot.  And our previous starting QB turned slot receiver turned backup QB may have to start and produce a win with a porous oline and a limited playbook....
I think each time one of the lineman gives up a sack or gets a penalty we should put them at QB on the next play. After they get the piss knocked out of them they might perform a little better.

I guess Heard will get the playbook with 3 plays instead of the one with 6 that we used against OK State :)  

 
7-5  Loss to either TCU or West Virginia (both road games). 

Good enough to stop the sky from falling; bad enough to keep this forum interesting.   

Next year 12-0, 14-0 overall.  MVP Cameron Rising. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Right now with the present record I would settle for a bowl gme,extra practice.

Now as to the TE decommiting make space for another DB or maybe another WR.

 
Now you're talking. Misery loves company.

Wait...what happens to Kate if you stay away from the thread?

Lets not get carried away. I kind of think we might win out too and I'm going to post at least one positive comment everyday.


Kate is a recruiting thing. This would be the wrong thread for her.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
7-5  Loss to either TCU or West Virginia (both road games). 

Good enough to stop the sky from falling; bad enough to keep this forum interesting.   

Next year 12-0, 14-0 overall.  MVP Cameron Rising. 
Agree with you on the first part. I think 6-6 or 7-5 are the most realistic outcomes right now. 

I remember that I said we would go 3-2 over the USC - OSU stretch, while we actually went 2-3 now. I think we haven't won any games that we weren't supposed to win right now, and I think the deciding factor will be if the teams learns to finish games.

The hardest tests coming up are obviously TCU and WVU on the road, but hypothetically, a win at TCU could give us huge momentum. I think another tough game ahead is actually Baylor. The team is better than their 0-7 record and they have played OU and WVU extremely close. We have to bring our A-game to win that one. Their run defense is horrible, giving up north of 220 yds per game, so it will be interesting to see if we can establish the run.

 
Kate is a recruiting thing. This would be the wrong thread for her.
What about Rosie? I think every thread is wrong for her.

Now that I think about it my "stinkin thinkin" started about the time her big head appeared on this sacred sight. I believe subconsciously when something negative happens with the team I now associate those events with Rosie O'donnell and it produces a rage within me. That would explain my recent behaviors. I grew up an Oiler fan so I have been thoroughly trained in handling disappointment.

It's Rosie freaking O'Donnell doing this to me. That fat bitch.

 
Okay, you're right. The program is a shit show and not worthy of further commentary. I've been persuaded that its more profitable for me to keep whatever positive thoughts I have to myself. We have a meltdown in progress and I am an obstacle between the mob and that meltdown. I am officially out of the way. lol

Buenos suerte.
Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

Dont do that.  We have lost 2 games we shouldnt have IMO.  Maryland and ou.  I will NEVER pick the sooners to beat us.  I always expect to win that game.  

You mentioned somewhere on this board its not just injuries its the slimmer quicker OL Herman needs for his offense. 

Now we are getting somewhere which is more reasonable than the injury excuse.

So we have to wait 2-3 years recruiting players to fit the scheme instead of making changes to the scheme to fit the personnel?  

I only ask this because Herman was asked during the Spring if he would run his offense or make changes to fit the players.  He said the latter.  I dont see it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've read all the comments in this thread and fall in between both sentiments. I worry that we are losing traction with some of the commits and targets. My biggest complaint is on offense, the substitution process or ideology seems that it is random. It seems at points that the personnel on the field doesn't match the play call. I also think Herman is as stubborn as it gets when it comes to doing things his way. At some point he is going to have to relax the every week is different mentality and recognize players previous contributions during the season. He said the definition of insanity is trying the same thing and expecting different results....well trying to fit a square peg in a round whole every week definitely applies, I haven't seen the offense adapt since the OL became a MASH unit, I see the same strategy every week.

Now on to the good. The defense is head and shoulders above where I thought it would be. Holding USC, 0U and Okie lite to below their season avg's is something to be proud of. The special teams have also made progress.

I was one who thought Texas could go 9-4 with a bowl win and I am now reassessing what the record might be when its all said and done. Probably 7-5, with a bowl game victory in doubt because of the offensive situation.

 
7-5  Loss to either TCU or West Virginia (both road games). 

Good enough to stop the sky from falling; bad enough to keep this forum interesting.   

Next year 12-0, 14-0 overall.  MVP Cameron Rising. 
TH has one more chance to beat a ranked team that is TCU.  WV probably gets beat by Iowa State and drops out.

Agree with the rest but 3rd year in row with a different freshmen QB?  No thanks.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

Dont do that.  We have lost 2 games we shouldnt have IMO.  Maryland and ou.  I will NEVER pick the sooners to beat us.  I always expect to win that game.  

You mentioned somewhere on this board its not just injuries its the slimmer quicker OL Herman needs for his offense. 

No, it was that we're dealing with the slimmer linemen that Charlie's OL coach recruited and preferred. Why are so many of those recruits considered pointless now? Garret Thomas? Why can't he play? Tope Imade? Why not him? Why is the OL the only place where we don't really say Charlie recruited well? Because he didn't.

Now we are getting somewhere which is more reasonable than the injury excuse.

Maybe not?

So we have to wait 2-3 years recruiting players to fit the scheme instead of making changes to the scheme to fit the personnel?  

Within our lifetime, sure.

I only ask this because Herman was asked during the Spring if he would run his offense or make changes to fit the players.  He said the latter.  I dont see it.

I don't either. We suck.

 
Is there really a wrong place to put Kate?  Rhetorical question SHA.
c01e6d77dc6e97e5f296a256fae6d7de.gif


 
What about Rosie? I think every thread is wrong for her.

Now that I think about it my "stinkin thinkin" started about the time her big head appeared on this sacred sight. I believe subconsciously when something negative happens with the team I now associate those events with Rosie O'donnell and it produces a rage within me. That would explain my recent behaviors. I grew up an Oiler fan so I have been thoroughly trained in handling disappointment.

It's Rosie freaking O'Donnell doing this to me. That fat bitch.


rosie, she can be anywhere, anytime. fear the rosie.

giphy-5-1474997152.gif


 
I streamed Mornings with Bucky and Erin on my way to work this morning and listened to an interesting discussion.  I will draft off of it to ask this question which seems to be relevant to our forum discussions:

If you were told at the beginning of the season that we would lose before the season or in the first couple of games:

Beck (starting TE), Rodriguez (starting RT), Williams (starting LT and best player on team),  Hudson (top backup, potential starter), McMillon and Shackelford would miss time at OG&C, and that Hodges would transfer (a part time starter from last season).... rendering the starting lineup as follows:

LT - Okafor (preseason expectations were as depth at RT)
LG - Vahe (in the Charlie Strong dog house much of last year)
C - Shackelford (good potential, history with shotgun snaps troubles - true soph)
RG - Cuney (Never expected to see a meaningful down at Texas)
RT - Kerstetter (True freshman three star recruit, expected to redshirt and develop for a couple years)
TE - Brewer (tall, lean true freshman TE expected to redshirt and develop for a couple years)

NOW, what would your expectations have been of the offensive line and the offense?

My honest take is this; the coaching staff could have done a little better making chicken salad out of this.... a little better. OL actually seemed to regress a bit the last week or two after showing a shred of hope vs KState.  However, the problem is primarily personnel issues outside of the coaches control (on the offensive line).  Tim Beck gets grilled here for play-calling.  I do take exception to this.  Every single play you draw up assumes your line can execute a block and not simply get whipped as soon as the ball is snapped.  The only conceivable plays (I can think of) to counter this is quick / sideways passes or jail break screen passes.  The defensive coaches we go against knows this better than I.  The issue has very little to do with play calling. 

If I have any issue with the coaching staff - and from my recliner in the Dallas Metroplex, I do.  It is player rotation (see ridiculous way three running backs are run in and out - never able to establish a rhythm).   And, I (from my recliner) think actual performance on the field is sometimes undervalued and  performance in practice is everything (again, see running backs, Collin Johnson and A. Foreman).   Hager's lack of playing time (one of a handful of good defensive players last year) fits into both of my just mentioned gripes. 

 
I streamed Mornings with Bucky and Erin on my way to work this morning and listened to an interesting discussion.  I will draft off of it to ask this question which seems to be relevant to our forum discussions:

If you were told at the beginning of the season that we would lose before the season or in the first couple of games:

Beck (starting TE), Rodriguez (starting RT), Williams (starting LT and best player on team),  Hudson (top backup, potential starter), McMillon and Shackelford would miss time at OG&C, and that Hodges would transfer (a part time starter from last season).... rendering the starting lineup as follows:

LT - Okafor (preseason expectations were as depth at RT)
LG - Vahe (in the Charlie Strong dog house much of last year)
C - Shackelford (good potential, history with shotgun snaps troubles - true soph)
RG - Cuney (Never expected to see a meaningful down at Texas)
RT - Kerstetter (True freshman three star recruit, expected to redshirt and develop for a couple years)
TE - Brewer (tall, lean true freshman TE expected to redshirt and develop for a couple years)

NOW, what would your expectations have been of the offensive line and the offense?

My honest take is this; the coaching staff could have done a little better making chicken salad out of this.... a little better. OL actually seemed to regress a bit the last week or two after showing a shred of hope vs KState.  However, the problem is primarily personnel issues outside of the coaches control (on the offensive line).  Tim Beck gets grilled here for play-calling.  I do take exception to this.  Every single play you draw up assumes your line can execute a block and not simply get whipped as soon as the ball is snapped.  The only conceivable plays (I can think of) to counter this is quick / sideways passes or jail break screen passes.  The defensive coaches we go against knows this better than I.  The issue has very little to do with play calling. 

If I have any issue with the coaching staff - and from my recliner in the Dallas Metroplex, I do.  It is player rotation (see ridiculous way three running backs are run in and out - never able to establish a rhythm).   And, I (from my recliner) think actual performance on the field is sometimes undervalued and  performance in practice is everything (again, see running backs, Collin Johnson and A. Foreman).   Hager's lack of playing time (one of a handful of good defensive players last year) fits into both of my just mentioned gripes. 
You are talking about Brewer but Kendall Moore is more applicable to Beck as far as blocking goes than the skinny freshmen.  Moore might even be better than Beck was at blocking.  He just isnt the receiving threat.  

I thought Okafor was under the Guard depth chart not tackle or atleast I thought so

 
Last edited by a moderator:
83Dee with a very good post above especially the following paragraph and the bolded parts. The bottom line is that the OL cannot execute a block and is getting actually whipped. Don't know why but I bet the coaches could tell you. 

My honest take is this; the coaching staff could have done a little better making chicken salad out of this.... a little better. OL actually seemed to regress a bit the last week or two after showing a shred of hope vs KState.  However, the problem is primarily personnel issues outside of the coaches control (on the offensive line).  Tim Beck gets grilled here for play-calling.  I do take exception to this.  Every single play you draw up assumes your line can execute a block and not simply get whipped as soon as the ball is snapped.  The only conceivable plays (I can think of) to counter this is quick / sideways passes or jail break screen passes.  The defensive coaches we go against knows this better than I.  The issue has very little to do with play calling. 

 
You are talking about Brewer but Kendall Moore is more applicable to Beck as far as blocking goes than the skinny freshmen.  Moore might even be better than Beck was at blocking.  He just isnt the receiving threat.  

I thought Okafor was under the Guard depth chart not tackle or atleast I thought so
You may be correct on Okafor.  The larger point is that both our tackles were never targeted to be there at this point.  That is probably a frightening prospect from a coaches perspective. 

Is Moore playing?  Serious question. 

 
Back
Top Bottom