Attorney-client privilege exists in all attorney-client communications. It belongs to the client.
A statement of "contract document for UT with the terms of 8.75 mil a year, for 6 years ending at 10" is nondescript enough that it probably doesn't violate it unless there are other confidentiality agreements in place. That said, I'd guess more information was imparted and, suffice it to say that any attorney would be wise to just keep quiet about these sorts of things. But some just can't help themselves it would seem.
A statement of "contract document for UT with the terms of 8.75 mil a year, for 6 years ending at 10" is nondescript enough that it probably doesn't violate it unless there are other confidentiality agreements in place. That said, I'd guess more information was imparted and, suffice it to say that any attorney would be wise to just keep quiet about these sorts of things. But some just can't help themselves it would seem.
Last edited by a moderator: