i saw this a.m. a comment on another board that shane won't have the advantage colt got from vy mentoring. i love vy like my brother and still consider him the finest college qb i ever saw, but his size and style of play was so different from that of colt mccoy that i question how valuable the association was from that standpoint. i think what we got from colt was colt, not vy part twain.
so i got to thinking who we might expect shane to mirror, and i come up blank. colt is burly enough that i don't think he's quite a match for shane. when i look at highlights, i don't see colt. i see major with wheels and much better athleticism and quickness. and that cleverness that major showed. maybe a quarter of major's highlight plays on that excellent recruits-in-review tape were plays that didn't work but major found a way to make it a highlight anyway. i see some of that in shane's highlights. colt had that in him, too. and vy. maybe my favorite vy play was him being tackled but he still fluttered the ball to someone who could advance it. it wasn't elegant, but it, by-god, worked.
so who physically? i wonder if kingsbury's heisman wunderkind might be a better match. shane won't run the ball against big12 defenses like manziel did the sec. kliff and jff caught some clumsy, over-built defenses flatfooted in a way that they wouldn't now.
there are other important differences with johnny-f's hot year. johnny caught the tail-end of sherman's program building while shane is catching the front-end of charlie's. but still johnny's quickness and cleverness might be the model for shane's play. that and leaning on a growing o-line and a couple of meat cleavers at the running back spot.