Randolph Duke
THE DUKE
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
- Messages
- 2,484
fifyWhen a coach can't win, it makes recruiting a little harder.
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!fifyWhen a coach can't win, it makes recruiting a little harder.
A lot of difference between looking at a hopeful future or viewing three years of abject failure.Our last 2 recruiting classes prove your statement wrong. Very wrong in fact.
So what is your explanation of last year's recruiting class being so highly ranked? After all, this is Strongs 3rd year.These recruits were expecting to win this year as were a lot of people. They gave him the first season just because it was his first. If you don't think winning is the biggest recruiting draw just look at the historical landscape of college football and maybe you'll get it right next time.
My comment that you are referencing is recruiting related, therefore your reply isn't a very strong one, at all.A lot of difference between looking at a hopeful future or viewing three years of abject failure.
I think it will be strong as nails if Charlie stays this year. Wait till February.My comment that you are referencing is recruiting related, therefore your reply isn't a very strong one, at all.
Do you really think his ( or anyones) recruiting classes won't be affected by winning at a .500 pace season after season? Bama isn't getting the pick of the litter because of anything but winning.So what is your explanation of last year's recruiting class being so highly ranked? After all, this is Strongs 3rd year.
Did I say that? I don't think I did.Do you really think his ( or anyones) recruiting classes won't be affected by winning at a .500 pace season after season? Bama isn't getting the pick of the litter because of anything but winning.
Of course my comment was also recruiting related.My comment that you are referencing is recruiting related, therefore your reply isn't a very strong one, at all.
So when you stated "three years of abject failure", that was recruiting related? Well, that's interesting. Puzzling as hell but interesting none the less.Of course my comment was also recruiting related.
When you go from first on Browning's list to not even in the top six it likely means the bloom is off of Charlie's rose. It certainly is for me.
Three years of abject failure on the field is going to lead to recruiting failure. It already is. Is that clear enough?So when you stated "three years of abject failure", that was recruiting related? Well, that's interesting. Puzzling as hell but interesting none the less.
Nope. It didn't really effect the previous 2 classes. The current class is no where near what it could/will be. Try again.Three years of abject failure on the field is going to lead to recruiting failure. It already is. Is that clear enough?
Many recruits have stated repeatedly last year that Strong was ABOUT to turn the corner. As a matter of FACT Wilson has been reported by a few even on here as saying Strong success on the field this year would impact his decision.So what is your explanation of last year's recruiting class being so highly ranked? After all, this is Strongs 3rd year.