Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

All Things Politics Thread

So you know NO ONE who has ever had any legal issues?

Why no, that's no true. And your point just blew up in your face.



Let me explain to you... slowly how this is yet another example of you face planting in the large ball of dung.

1. You answered your own question.  Is that how they teach you on the short....well you get the idea

2. You don't know me so you don't know any of my acquaintances and can't answer for me

3. You're statement has nothing to do with the original post...there's a term for that...

4. Oh yeah, whataboutism.

5. You're trying to defend an admitted sexual predator by not denouncing him and trying to redirect the narrative, see #4

6. Your statement is vague and ambiguous.  Do I know someone with legal issues?  Sure, Rudy G.  Do I know any sexual predators?  Sure, trump.

7. You're trying to equate sexual harassment with "any" legal issues, which it's not.

8. Do I have any friends or acquaintances that are sexual predators?  I can unequivocally state, NO.

You.... Face plant... large ball of dung...   your home.

 
Yes I like the idea of convenience as long as it is monitored and all votes are legal votes. I wish we had 100% participation. But if drive thru is made illegal it doesn’t take away their ability to vote it just may make it a little more inconvenient. Guess we will find out which voters really care. 
"may make it a little more inconvenient"

And that's the voter suppression point.  There was no proof that drive thru voting was insecure.  If the goal is to get as many voters to vote as possible why not be creative and create innovative opportunities to vote.

Let me give you a practical example; a hypothetical situation.  We have 2 stores.  Store A and Store B.

Store A is innovative and creates checkout lanes for 15 items and lower to give customers that have a small number of items a better shopping experience.

Store B didn't do it.  They cry unfair and don't want to offer the convenience for any customers.  They want a law banning checkout lanes for 15 items and lower.

Now ask yourself.  Shouldn't all stores have checkout lanes for 15 items and lower?  I think it's obvious, Yes.

 
If you see him or know him, call the FBI.  It's your American duty.




 
Last edited by a moderator:
"may make it a little more inconvenient"

And that's the voter suppression point.  There was no proof that drive thru voting was insecure.  If the goal is to get as many voters to vote as possible why not be creative and create innovative opportunities to vote.

Let me give you a practical example; a hypothetical situation.  We have 2 stores.  Store A and Store B.

Store A is innovative and creates checkout lanes for 15 items and lower to give customers that have a small number of items a better shopping experience.

Store B didn't do it.  They cry unfair and don't want to offer the convenience for any customers.  They want a law banning checkout lanes for 15 items and lower.

Now ask yourself.  Shouldn't all stores have checkout lanes for 15 items and lower?  I think it's obvious, Yes.
Inconvenience doesn’t =voter suppression 

comparing a grocery store that has a labor budget and and a sales budget and an ebitda budget to hit to an occasional election with mostly volunteers or government paid employees is not the same. You can shop wherever you choose, I guess if someone doesn’t like the way the voting system in Texas works they can choose to move to a state or another country that fits their needs 

 
Here's the guy who shotty has been trotting out as some sort of credible source. lol

5th Circuit Keeps Sanctions On Democrat Russia Hoax Lawyer Marc Elias

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Wednesday it will keep sanctions it levied against lawyer Marc Elias, known for his role in the Russia collusion hoax and other Democrat operations, for his “lack of candor.” The court will vacate its sanctions against three of Elias’s fellow Perkins Coie lawyers.

Elias ran campaigns to change voting laws and practices to favor Democrats and in 2020 founded Democracy Docket, an organization self-described as “the leading progressive platform dedicated to opinion, advocacy, and information about voting rights, elections, redistricting and democracy.”

 
Back
Top Bottom