How did Trump interfere if he supposedly lost?The investigation doesn't have anything to do with the fraudit.
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!How did Trump interfere if he supposedly lost?The investigation doesn't have anything to do with the fraudit.
9 hours ago, drgilbert said:
I believe I posted a tweet from Katie Hobbs addressing your question. It explains exactly what you're asking.How did Trump interfere if he supposedly lost?
"may make it a little more inconvenient"Yes I like the idea of convenience as long as it is monitored and all votes are legal votes. I wish we had 100% participation. But if drive thru is made illegal it doesn’t take away their ability to vote it just may make it a little more inconvenient. Guess we will find out which voters really care.
Inconvenience doesn’t =voter suppression"may make it a little more inconvenient"
And that's the voter suppression point. There was no proof that drive thru voting was insecure. If the goal is to get as many voters to vote as possible why not be creative and create innovative opportunities to vote.
Let me give you a practical example; a hypothetical situation. We have 2 stores. Store A and Store B.
Store A is innovative and creates checkout lanes for 15 items and lower to give customers that have a small number of items a better shopping experience.
Store B didn't do it. They cry unfair and don't want to offer the convenience for any customers. They want a law banning checkout lanes for 15 items and lower.
Now ask yourself. Shouldn't all stores have checkout lanes for 15 items and lower? I think it's obvious, Yes.