Strange as it sounds, I don't disagree with you. I don't condone what he did, but I don't understand why he did it, either. For me, Adrian Peterson (or is it Petersen?) is an enigma. He made a comment shortly after the two year old died that really puzzled me when I read it. Someone sympathized with him, and he made a statement that was something on the order of, 'you don't understand the whole situation'. What? You had a child, and that child was just murdered. I'm sorry that happened. What more could there be!Agree with everything you said, expect the part about Peterson not being particularly violent. A person doesn't beat a four year old like that without being very violent. Of course he going to play the just a parent disciplining his child card when the child has cuts and bruises like that.
What makes this even more disgusting is the fact that Peterson had a two year son that was killed by a man that abused him.
Now this. I agree that wasn't discipline, but abuse. Wouldn't mandatory counseling be more effective than cutting him loose? Mandatory counseling and not allowing him re-entry into the NFL until he shows completion of the program and passes a psychological exam. The NFL carrot is the only way I see that happening.
I see treatment as a better option than no treatment, and I don't recall him being in the news prior to this, except when his son was killed by someone else. We can be outraged, but his children will be better served if he is treated.
He has the means to harass the mothers of his children in court for visitation, and/or custody, for years. Outrage won't stop that.
Last edited by a moderator: