Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

*****GAME THREAD: #24 Texas @ #13 Kansas State*****

 No are you.  the post was on Ewers completeion % of 48% If thats wrong then I am wrong

I have never said Card over Ewers. Did say however the way Ewers was playing ve TT achange at QBshould have happened.
"As Jack said, they cannot handle the truth"

Exactly what truth is that?

 
"As Jack said, they cannot handle the truth"

Exactly what truth is that?
If I may… I believe it is that some were overly critical of Card.  Which is probably true.

Ewers looks much better that he did in Lubbock… but still misses badly on the long ball.  Is the smashed finger theory true?   

 
My post tp SHA was wrong my mistake.

% was 46%  not 48% as I posted As for as the Bat guano f I had some I would put it in garden. Where it would do the most good.

There is  disase infecting this board. Forwant of a better name, I will call it Cardites.?

 
What is the truth? That Hudson Card should be starting over Ewers?

Are you smoking bat guano?
They state the same thing over and over. As I stated before, wash, rinse, repeat. It's like hearing Miriah Carey's "All I Want for Christmas" 24 x7!

200.gif


 
Meh, I figured it would be an 8-4 type season with QE at the helm and that's still obtainable.  Card has lost the job, twice.  He's not going to be QB 1 at Texas.  Go ahead and pack those bags.

Sark is leaving a funky taste in my mouth, but.  I'm not jumping off the wagon.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Quinn ewers passing completion percentage the past two games is 46% … my main reason pointing that out is that y’all were too hard on Hudson Card during his time as a UT Quarterback because he was better than 46% passing completion percentage but got crucified 
As I've said before, stats alone are meaningless. My criticism with Card is that he holds the ball to long. He doesn't read the coverage but waits for a receiver to get open. He has gotten better but is still a bit slow. He could be great next year. Ewers on the other hand, reads the coverage and throws the ball where the receiver should be open. If the receiver doesn't make the same read on the defense, he could run a different route and bad throw or interception.

So here is a stat that JD doesn't consider:

Card 2-2 (this year), 3-3 career

Ewers 4-1 

Who do you want to be the QB of your team?

 
As I've said before, stats alone are meaningless. My criticism with Card is that he holds the ball to long. He doesn't read the coverage but waits for a receiver to get open. He has gotten better but is still a bit slow. He could be great next year. Ewers on the other hand, reads the coverage and throws the ball where the receiver should be open. If the receiver doesn't make the same read on the defense, he could run a different route and bad throw or interception.

So here is a stat that JD doesn't consider:

Card 2-2 (this year), 3-3 career

Ewers 4-1 

Who do you want to be the QB of your team?
Funny how you don't like stats, then quote stats that are wrong.

Card as a starter is 2-1 (with a TT loss not on him)

Ewers as a starter is 4-2 (do we really count LaMon?)

Ewers best passes have turned out to be the ones where he and the receiver establish eye contact. Ewers did a great job not throwing int's (2 were dropped) and Sark closed up the playbook and admitted fearing for a turnover, the same thing that was used to downgrade Card. We have yet to see Ewers playing from behind, something Card has done well twice. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Do we really count Bama since he played less than full 1 quarter. Texas was fully in control of that game with QE at the helm. Semantics. Stop blowing so hard. Yes, I realize that's your schtick.

Also, get the f outta here with a loss not on him bs.  That Bama loss isn't on Ewers.  LMAO

 
I don’t doubt Quinn is the right long term choice - I just wanted us to not criticize Hudson Card so badly because he received unfair criticism in the offseason as people talked about Quinn Ewers ability to complete the deep ball better. I just hope Hudson Card lands in a good next situation

and Sark + coaching staff need to get to work on DEVELOPING the players we have on campus, instead of looking to the transfer portal

 
Do we really count Bama since he played less than full 1 quarter. Texas was fully in control of that game with QE at the helm. Semantics. Stop blowing so hard. Yes, I realize that's your schtick.

Also, get the f outta here with a loss not on him bs.  That Bama loss isn't on Ewers.  LMAO
UT had 3 points with Quinn vs Bama. If he get's hurt that's how it goes, he failed to finish and win the game. And yes, the Bama loss isn't on him, but he was the starter. 

Without Card's heroic's with 21 seconds and no timeouts, and Auburn, there is no OT for Bijan to fumble. 

I didn't start this Monday morning QB thing, but you know I'm going to engage in it. 

Saturday IMO we saw 2 teams lose because of their coache's unwillingness to make the necessary QB change, one benefitted UT with KSU going back to Martinez rather than the red hot Howard, and one at Clemson where the backup had just salvaged a game the previous week.

http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=34970880

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Funny how you don't like stats, then quote stats that are wrong.

Card as a starter is 2-1 (with a TT loss not on him)

Ewers as a starter is 4-2 (do we really count LaMon?)

Ewers best passes have turned out to be the ones where he and the receiver establish eye contact. Ewers did a great job not throwing int's (2 were dropped) and Sark closed up the playbook and admitted fearing for a turnover, the same thing that was used to downgrade Card. We have yet to see Ewers playing from behind, something Card has done well twice. 
Like I said, stats are meaningless on their own. I can throw stats out just like anyone to "prove" a side.

And because I was a baseball player, I assign wins and losses just like baseball. If a starting QB, leaves the game with the lead, and the reliever comes in and blows it, the loss is on the reliever. You can show it any way you want.

You play the games on your schedule. Doesn't matter who they are. Ewers is 4-1 and Card 3-3. Are you saying that App St over the aggies and Liberty over arkansas don't count? Because last I saw, their records show a win/loss because of those games.

 
Like I said, stats are meaningless on their own. I can throw stats out just like anyone to "prove" a side.

And because I was a baseball player, I assign wins and losses just like baseball. If a starting QB, leaves the game with the lead, and the reliever comes in and blows it, the loss is on the reliever. You can show it any way you want.

You play the games on your schedule. Doesn't matter who they are. Ewers is 4-1 and Card 3-3. Are you saying that App St over the aggies and Liberty over arkansas don't count? Because last I saw, their records show a win/loss because of those games.
IMO only Big 12 games should count in player evaluations, heck even then we pull some starters when we are ahead. There is no completely objective method using stats only. Qb's don't play defense etc. That's why completion % is the gold standard, it eliminates running plays, but admittedly still doesn't separate easy passes from hard ones. Neither QB here has proven to have command of the deep ball. That was supposed to be Quinn's thing, only it isn't. At this point Sark won't let any of his QB's change a play at the line of scrimmage, they are just following instructions and trying to make reads. It goes without saying that Sark has a strict no running policy which at times could make all the difference since no D respects it at all.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As I've said before, stats alone are meaningless. My criticism with Card is that he holds the ball to long. He doesn't read the coverage but waits for a receiver to get open. He has gotten better but is still a bit slow. He could be great next year. Ewers on the other hand, reads the coverage and throws the ball where the receiver should be open. If the receiver doesn't make the same read on the defense, he could run a different route and bad throw or interception.

So here is a stat that JD doesn't consider:

Card 2-2 (this year), 3-3 career

Ewers 4-1 

Who do you want to be the QB of your team?
Manning?

 
Sark is not about to settle for a game manager as his star QB. The decision for next year becomes much easier if we finish strong and contend for a title. Finish weak and there needs to be an open competition IMO.

Right now if you do a video of Worthy quitting on passes video, and a Quinn overthrow video, which do you think will be longer?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If I may… I believe it is that some were overly critical of Card.  Which is probably true.

Ewers looks much better that he did in Lubbock… but still misses badly on the long ball.  Is the smashed finger theory true?   
Or maybe none of that gets said at all if the board didn't have someone constantly pimping Card?

Yes, he injured his finger and lost most of a fingernail.

 
Back
Top Bottom