Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

Friday Chat: Let's Do This

Harrison Wier

Staff Writer
Joined
Sep 8, 2016
Messages
1,581
Hey everyone,

Going to try a Friday chat this week to see the type of response we get. Couple of team notes as well as some Big 12 news.

The Big 12 has made a decision on how it will format the renewed conferenced championship game starting in 2017. The days of divisional winners within the conference earning a bid to the Big 12 championship are over. Instead, the Big 12 opted to pit the #1 and #2 teams of the conference overall against each other. I personally think this is a huge mistake for the conference. The goal of the Big 12 is to get a team into the CFP every year. Under this scenario, it is going to be much more difficult to do so. The divisions in the conference are very lopsided. Although it may be less exciting, it almost guarantees that the Big 12 South divisional winner could make the CFP if the record is enough. With two of the best teams playing each other twice a year, there is potential for both to knock each other out of the playoff debate. Yes, the chances of that are slim. But the chances are much higher than if the conference retained the divisional style championship game. 



Texas is going to face a tough Baylor offense, but something that has not been talked about enough is just how much the Bears defense has exceeded expectations. Baylor currently ranks 35th nationally in rush defense, and 23rd for total defensive efficiency. Another thing that helps the Bears? They deal with the exact same offense that Texas runs in practice every day. However, the Bears version of the veer and shoot is much more installed than the Longhorns'. It generally takes a couple of years to 100% install an offense like this, which could explain the lack of a diverse play-calling. Overall, this is going to be a tough game for the Longhorns. Texas will have to click on all cylinders to stay in this game. 

In terms of team notes, I have a few. Malik Jefferson reportedly practice with the scout team all week. Take it as an attempt by Charlie Strong to give the sophomore LB a "wake up call." Let's hope it works. Jake McMillon has been splitting first team reps at LG (yes, not center) with Patrick Vahe. It is the thought of the offensive staff that McMillon's physical play has earned him a solid look as a starter on the line. Lastly, it was reported by Horns247 that the Texas offense torched the defense all week of practice. Not good. As I said, Baylor has way more diversity in terms of scheme on their offense. 

What are your thoughts heading into tomorrows game? Texas takes on Baylor at 2:30 CT on ABC. Oklahoma vs. Kansas received a late night slot on FS1, which just shows how media outlets view the Longhorns as of late. That's just where the Texas program is right now, unfortunately. Fire away with questions!

 
Question...what is more lame? A one division round-robin CCG or...or...never mind. Nothing is that lame.

Since expansion is off the trouble, IF you're hellbent on a CCG, split into two 5-team divisions, play 4 in your division and 4 in the other. Add a cream puff OOC game SEC-style to pad your win total.

Moot point now, but this is weak even for the B12.

 
Question...what is more lame? A one division round-robin CCG or...or...never mind. Nothing is that lame.

Since expansion is off the trouble, IF you're hellbent on a CCG, split into two 5-team divisions, play 4 in your division and 4 in the other. Add a cream puff OOC game SEC-style to pad your win total.

Moot point now, but this is weak even for the B12.
I agree. You can even play 9 conference games with 2 5-team divisions and keep your 3 OOC games. That works fine as well. Then there is the argument of playing someone twice, but again divisions are not equal. One division winner will most likely not be the #1 or #2 team in the conference. Easier path to the playoff for said team, and Big 12 has a representative and makes more $$ because of it. Win win.

 
Why on earth would you bench Malik? Or even have him run with scout? Here's a grand idea: how about you move him to his NATURAL POSITION???? Heck, let him play Fox?  This is ridiculous!!!

 
If Vahe is benched then it is truly one of the most perplexing moves that has been made to date unless I am totally missing something. Doesn't make sense if you are truly trying to get your best 5 on the field.

As for Malik, there is plenty not going his way this year, but I figured he will still get worked in this weekend despite not getting a start.

 
Why on earth would you bench Malik? Or even have him run with scout? Here's a grand idea: how about you move him to his NATURAL POSITION???? Heck, let him play Fox?  This is ridiculous!!!
Maybe it is "If I'm going down; you're coming with me?" 

 
Why on earth would you bench Malik? Or even have him run with scout? Here's a grand idea: how about you move him to his NATURAL POSITION???? Heck, let him play Fox? This is ridiculous!!!
I would support this if there was a LB who was physical enough to play MLB. There isn't unfortunately

 
If Vahe is benched then it is truly one of the most perplexing moves that has been made to date unless I am totally missing something. Doesn't make sense if you are truly trying to get your best 5 on the field.

As for Malik, there is plenty not going his way this year, but I figured he will still get worked in this weekend despite not getting a start.
Vahe is Foreman's best friend. He's not Buechele's, but still hard to explain. I think we will still see plenty of Malik. Cole will make Strong take him out rather quickly

 
Vahe is Foreman's best friend. He's not Buechele's, but still hard to explain. I think we will still see plenty of Malik. Cole will make Strong take him out rather quickly
Even if we are talking pass pro as being the driving issue here, I can't wrap my mind around Vahe being on the pine. Perkins has struggled plenty this year and the only time he sat was during his suspension.

If they want Jake in the lineup, then the most logical move is to let him play center and sit Shack.

 
I would support this if there was a LB who was physical enough to play MLB. There isn't unfortunately
I totally get that but I guess I look at it like this: We're playing Malik out of position because we have don't a LB who is tough enough to play that position. Yet Malik is being bench because he isn't physical enough? With that being said, then why don't we move Malik to his natural position allowing him to wreck shop and realize his potential there? How badly would this defense suffer if the 2nd string guy (whoever that is) starts at MLB when we have a potential All American on the outside? Make sense? I'm not sure that I clearly articulated my point...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I hate the moves to bench most of the talented sophomores. Have you heard news as to why? I see little chance of us winning without them. 

 
Here's an idea: why not move Roach to MLB? He's damn sure physical enough and I think he's fast enough to man the middle.

Recruiting question: "IF" it is indeed Herman we end up with and it happens quick, can he still salvage a good class and still have a good chance with Wilson, Little, Browning? I think Herman would pretty much land Chaisson.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Prediction: Tomorrows UT loss will make the Texans loss at the Alamo look like an overwhelming Texan victory..............................................................................................................................................probably. 

 
I totally get that but I guess I look at it like this: We're playing Malik out of position because we have don't a LB who is tough enough to play that position. Yet Malik is being bench because he isn't physical enough? With that being said, then why don't we move Malik to his natural position allowing him to wreck shop and realize his potential there? How badly would this defense suffer if the 2nd string guy (whoever that is) starts at MLB when we have a potential All American on the outside? Make sense? I'm not sure that I clearly articulated my point...
Maybe they were dogging it in practice or something like that.  Certainly the coaches would have considered the idea above on their own..... right? 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The best MLB prospect on the roster, might also be the best player on the defense this year (currently playing another position).... Hager.  No???

It is like the better we recruit a position; the worse that position gets (LB / DB)....

 
Per a few other sites. Vahe, Malik, and Wheeler all benched. Freeman and Cole will start at LB. Also Bonney and Hall starting... LMAO

BYE CHARLIE
Perrin just needs to step in and bench Charlie Strong. Strong is the one who needs the wake up call.

Last week, in the first half, K State had 19 first downs. Texas had 19 total plays. Just let that sink in for a while.

Charlie Strong's opinion on anything team related means nothing to me. Benching players to give them "a wake-up call" when they have been as poorly coached as they have been is almost comical.

 
I gotta question regarding the "poorly coached" rhetoric I've seen repeatedly: are these guys really that poorly coached? Regarding preparation, I get it.  Game management, I get it. But to me it seems that these guys are in position more often than not and just flat out don't get it done. Is it really Strong's fault that guys aren't wrapping up?  Is it his fault that a db gets torched on a fly route? Is it Strong's fault that the secondary fails to communicate? Idk...I understand the disgust with Strong but I also think we need to place more blame on the players. I know we've had a couple of highly rated recruiting classes but maybe these kids as a whole aren't as talented as we want to believe they are?  Solid players indeed but maybe not the savages we chose to believe they were.  And I base that off the fact that we question our top recruit and crown jewel of the past 2 years physicality. Savagery and physicality go hand in hand and shouldn't be mutually exclusive imho...

 
Back
Top Bottom