Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

Its time to fire Strong

Failed attempt to respond. I deleted the quote altogether.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I did not mean it personally, SHA. Only that I knew you would answer thoughtfully, which you did. I was attempting to hear by what criteria the BMDs that you have access to defined improvement. I am sure I could have said it better but that is why I singled you out.

 
I did not mean it personally, SHA. Only that I knew you would answer thoughtfully, which you did. I was attempting to hear by what criteria the BMDs that you have access to defined improvement. I am sure I could have said it better but that is why I singled you out.

No problem. I know it's not wins and losses alone, but a broader improvement. He's achieved in some areas that I think are important, such as the class room, and the level of talent coming in.

 
I'd like to see that happen. I think we turn the corner in 2016.

You're dead on with your second sentence. The problem though is that we've sucked for two years before Strong even got here. The downhill slide has been going on since 2010. Patience is REALLY wearing thin among those who write checks. They really thought they'd see improvement this season.
Do those who write checks recognize that they could've done something about the slide well before MB was replaced in 2014?  It's much easier to turn a downhill slide around than it is to start an uphill climb from rock bottom and if we weren't at rock bottom we were pretty damn close.  Getting the program back on track was not going to be a 2 year job and if they've got enough football savvy to hire coaches and evaluate the progress of a massive rebuild they should've known that...most of us did.  It'd be a shame if they got rid of him 2 years into what's a least a 3-year job.

 
I disagree. I think a win on the road in a tough place to play would have really helped. It would give some indication that we're over our "road game issue" as some have pointed to.

Given the fact that we've played one of the toughest schedules in the nation, 6-6 and a bowl game (with good showing) would have probably quieted the herd.
The Herd isn't the fraction preparing the buyout you have pointed to as an incentive to move on.   If the herd mentality controlled this situation or the decision making process of BMD's, we have bigger problems on our hands.

 
Do those who write checks recognize that they could've done something about the slide well before MB was replaced in 2014?  It's much easier to turn a downhill slide around than it is to start an uphill climb from rock bottom and if we weren't at rock bottom we were pretty damn close.  Getting the program back on track was not going to be a 2 year job and if they've got enough football savvy to hire coaches and evaluate the progress of a massive rebuild they should've known that...most of us did.  It'd be a shame if they got rid of him 2 years into what's a least a 3-year job.

Deloss Dodds.

 
The Herd isn't the fraction preparing the buyout you have pointed to as an incentive to move on.   If the herd mentality controlled this situation or the decision making process of BMD's, we have bigger problems on our hands.

Herd is indeed that faction. It's also the faction of 100K that are supposed to fill up DKR and buy our merchandise and branding. 

But no, BMDs don't think like we do. We sometimes think like they do, though. They care about success, the money making that goes with it, and the idea that UT should be at the top.

 
Herd is indeed that faction. It's also the faction of 100K that are supposed to fill up DKR and buy our merchandise and branding. 

But no, BMDs don't think like we do. We sometimes think like they do, though. They care about success, the money making that goes with it, and the idea that UT should be at the top.
There are bigger things at play than poor play when it comes to poor attendance.  I have season tickets.  Merchandise hasn't and won't fall off and the brand will be back on top.  Foolish decision can also send it further into the toilet which could very well include the removal of Strong.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are bigger things at play than poor play when it comes to poor attendance.  I have season tickets.  Merchandise hasn't and won't fall off and the brand will be back on top.  Foolish decision can also send it further into the toilet which could very well include the removal of Strong.
Sometimes waiting too long to fire someone can be just as bad as firing them too quick can. Anyone that has been there can attest to that. And, yes, I've been there.

 
 further into the toilet which could very well include the removal of Strong.

It's all a matter of perception. I agree with you. But the donors believe cutting bait now saves us from going "further into the toilet."

We'll see how it plays out.

 
CUNpDdMU8AAS3id.jpg


ESPN's Danny Kanell: Texas' Charlie Strong should leave Texas for Miami job http://d-news.co/URFLn

ESPN's Danny Kanell: Texas' Charlie Strong should leave Texas for Miami job

"(The Miami) is the job that fits him perfectly," Kanell said. "I think Charlie Strong is a great coach and I like him a lot. He recruited me. He was at the University of Florida. I was in south Florida. He was my contact."
Kanell added that Strong's recruiting ability plays a role in why he should go to Miami.
"He's notoriously gone after Florida," Kanell said. "He's so familiar with the state. I think he resonates with the college football coaches there."
Kanell also said that Texas is an odd fit for Strong.
"When he went to Texas, I thought he might have a chance at success," Kanell said. "It's kind of a weird fight though. You kind of have to be the role of governor. I mean, Mack Brown was the perfect Texas football coach because he's great with the media ... Charlie Strong is not that guy and I think people are always going to hold that comparison."
He also said there are things that would be better for Strong in Miami.
"If he goes to Miami, first and most important thing I think he has that he doesn't have at Texas, he's got a quarterback," Kanell said. "Brad Kaaya is one of these special quarterbacks."

http://www.sportsdaydfw.com/college-sports/texaslonghorns/2015/11/19/national-analyst-texas-charlie-strong-leave-texas-miami-job

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good stuff Mayhall. Looks like they're building some depth and expect both backs to be out for at least this game.

I'm not afraid of a combo of Warren and Johnson. Johnson's going to show some stuff if they get him involved in the short passing game.

 
I really want to see what Johnson can do.  I think the kid can make some things happen if given the chance

 
Be nice to McNeal get in the game since we've already burned his shirt. Really would like to know the real reason he isn't playing.

 
It's all a matter of perception. I agree with you. But the donors believe cutting bait now saves us from going "further into the toilet."

We'll see how it plays out.
It is just my opinion but I think Strong is back in 2016 but after that all bets are off. Now with that said I really hate to say this but if Texas could really get Saban you have to do it because if Strong does not work out the program is dead for at least several more years. But again Saban is not coming so I am afraid we are going to suck for several more years.

 
Back
Top Bottom