Duke, unlike quite a few posters on this board, I don't ever really find myself all that annoyed with your posts. With that said, this post is so ridiculous that I can't help but respond. Having a 53rd ranked class is what we're going to be getting used to? The 2015 class in which we pulled down many top commits and flipped a few at the deadline isn't something to be excited about? Changing the culture of a program that has been run over for the better part of five years isn't going to be a process?
Come on dude. You're passing realism with pessimism and it's overshadowing your sometimes insightful and more discussion driven posts. I say that not as one of the those posters who simply places you on ignore. But as somebody who found value in some of the more, again, insightful posts you've shared in the past.
The goal is not to sign players, but to get them enrolled and on the field in a game. By that standard, the 2015 recruiting class was extremely unimpressive. As I said, the team has 78 scholarship players and that is after moving Merrick up from a greyshirt.
The reality is that the football program is years away from competing at an elite level. Patterson's nickle and dime stupidity is eating into the foundation of the program on multiple levels. If Wickline gets stuck paying his buyout to OSU, what will that do to Coach Strong's ability to recruit coaches? Steve Patterson is among the worst bosses in all of college sports. Who really wants to work for him? I have admired Shaka Smart's coaching style for a while, but I sincerely believe he made a huge mistake signing on to work for Patterson. Quality control staff being paid less than Kansas isn't going to do much to help the reputation of UT for attracting the best and the brightest staff. I have long been a critic of Bellmont because nothing about Bellmont outside of volleyball, swimming/diving and Randa Ryan even come close to qualifying as highly competent. When athletes see the hypocrisy of being expected to exemplify excellence when the rest of Bellmont exemplifies mediocrity, there is no question they are going to understand UT athletics doesn't truly believe in excellence.
I understand the HS staff has to refrain from being honest and objective about UT sports or Patterson will jerk your credentials. I understand you can't ask the hard questions or press for answers on questions that make anyone inside Bellmont even slightly uncomfortable, but the reality is unless UT athletics attacks the uncomfortable truths, the major programs will remain mired in mediocrity.
Work out the numbers and see where the 2015 class that made it to campus ranked, as opposed to the one that was signed back in Feb. UT is so far away from being in the company of the elite programs it is sad. After a losing season with multiple humiliating losses, Vegas has the O/U on wins for UT as 6. It isn't just me with pitiful expectations for UT football, it is coming from a lot of professionals who are highly paid to consider such things.
UT football isn't on the verge of a renaissance. That is a hard truth we need to accept if we are going to get the program back to competing as a top 20 program, and even just aspiring to be a top 20 program is a humbling.
78 scholarship athletes going into the season is so far below the UT standard, we can only accept there is no real UT standard and we need to lower the bar to find one. Lowering the bar is not what UT is supposed to be about.
[And, for the record, I have long said some on the uncomfortable questions that should be asked are since Patterson obviously sees the need for expense reduction, considering the average expense level per athlete for a public university in the US is roughly $110k/athlete, that Stanford has won the Director's Cup for 20 years running on a level of $108k/athlete, that Patterson the ASU athletic department at an expense level of $135k/athlete and UT is now higher than $240k/athlete, what level of expenditures per athlete does Patterson believe would reflect a fiscally responsibly run athletic department and when does he intend to get it there?
Also, ask Patterson if he is willing to make the year end NCAA financial reports available online without a FOIA request, so UT athletics has a higher level of transparency than other programs.
Ask those questions and your press credentials will be pulled instantly.
UT athletics isn't ready to do what it takes to get to the next level. the athletes know it, the coaching staff knows it, the press knows it and the fans know it.
This isn't a Charlie Strong problem or a Shaka Smart problem. Hell, it isn't even a Steve Patterson problem. Its a Greg Fenves problem and he isn't any more willing to make the tough decision than any credentialed reporter is willing to ask the tough questions.
Right now, the question is how low are we willing to lower the bar to say the status quo is the "Texas Standard." 53rd in the nation in recruiting at this part of the cycle is where this program is, literally and figuratively.]