Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

The BCS is EVIL!

beevomav

V.I.P.
Joined
Jul 12, 2011
Messages
2,956
The BCS is not a system designed to choose a national champion. It is a bogus system set up to hold off the inevitable, a playoff that will truly select a national championship. Until a playoff comes they must do away with the current 1-2 system.

travel_BCS_champ_288v.gif


The largest part of the selection process are human opinion polls that are used by coaches and boosters to raise up their conferences and lower their rival conferences. They are influenced by a mob mentality and the uneducated and that is the good part. The computer rankings are mostly secret, even from the BCS themselves. No one knows how they get their rankings, let alone if they are honest or influenced by money.

The fix is a playoff and even a four team formula would be a good start, but until then a single computer based system, like the QB rating, where the public could follow and keep the system honest would be preferable to a system that like Kenneth Massey’s rankings had Arizona Western, a community college, 30th overall. This happened in October of this year in one of the computer rankings.

This week is Championship Week and in the Big Twelve all eyes will be focused on Bedlam, the game between OSU and OU. In reality the once beaten OSU Cowboys have no chance at the BCS title game, even with a resounding win.

That is being taken over by LSU and Bama rematch. It doesn't even matter if LSU loses to Georgia because the mob mentality, led by ESPN who owns the television rights to the BCS game, will fight to the death to assure they get their game.

The same goes for once beaten Stanford, who's one loss was to Oregon, on the road. Yet Alabama's loss didn't matter. Nor does the fact they won't even win their conference. We have a possible set up that could have two teams in the BCS Championship Game that finished second and third in their conference. I thank the BCS, their computers, ESPN and all the idiots that will watch the game.

 
Just a thought that crossed my mind... if Georgia wins can their still be a Bama - LSU championship game? The BCS says only 2 teams from the same conference can play in BCS games. If Georgia wins... they would be SEC champs... reserving one of the SEC's two spots in BCS games. If this applies, somebody gets shafted. Does the 1-2 title rule override the 2 team rule? Can Georgia lose an auto bid as a conference champion? This shit is just all f##ked up...

 
Ah, you misread the rules. It says Bowls not teams. So the SEC can send three teams to a BCS Bowl as long as two of them are playing each other.

Two bowls, three teams..

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Her'es the rub:

No more than two teams from a conference may be selected, regardless of whether they are automatic qualifiers or at-large selections, unless two non-champions from the same conference are ranked No. 1 and No. 2 in the final BCS Standings.
 
There will be a lot of teams that get screwed out of BCS Bowl possibilities because of this.

 
Her'es the rub:
You know I missed that part in my reading. So it sets up perfectly for Bama/LSU II, even in the event Georgia wins. The fix is in, just listen to ESPN and their analyst who do their evil work.

 
The BCS is just rediculous. They love the SEC and hate everyone else. They decide to punish some one loss teams but let others slip through without a hitch. They give an AQ bid to the Big East who could potentially have a conference champion with 3 losses every year. They punish schools stuck in weak conferences who work their asses for one good undefeated season and say that a one loss team deserves to play for the title because of 'strength of schedule'. Who the F@#K determines what strength of schedule is anyway? Am I saying an undefeated team from the Sunbelt should play in the title game... no. But how is to say that a one loss team from the SEC is better than an undefeated team who completely dominated conference opponents from the Mountain West. As far as I am concerned, non-BCS schools play tougher non-conference games than AQ schools do. I mean look at Boise. They have beaten Georgia, Virginia Tech, Oregon and plenty of other top notch programs. And yes... they have one loss this year and they did last year but that does not mean they are not a good enough football team to play a BCS game. Who gives a shit about conference play when it comes to strength of schedule. Bowl games are about pitting two schools against each other for a one and done. Bowl games are all or nothing. Sorry about going on and on... but I REALLY hate the BCS.

 
The rundown - some TCU lineman a few years back evidently sent an email to this musician and asked him to write a song about how screwed up the BCS is. I think it was 2009 that he sent the email and TCU ended up losing to Boise State in the Fiesta Bowl 17-10.



Maybe we can email this dude and have him sing a little jingle about A&M getting the SHIT stomped out of them in their last game against TEXAS!

 
Back
Top Bottom