SFlonghorngirl
Premium Members
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2013
- Messages
- 2,424
Let's go Stanford! Let's do this! I probably just jinxed them. 
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!And then there was one.
Yes, after 32 "second-round" games (we put that in quotes because really it's Round 1) in this year's NCAA tournament – and one more starting Saturday's action – a perfect bracket does remain.
Congratulations Brad Binder of "Brad's Breathtaking Bracket," your bracket really is breathtaking. You picked Mercer over Duke. You picked Dayton over Ohio State. And you got lucky as hell when VCU bailed out Stephen F. Austin with a four-point play in the closing seconds of regulation and wound up losing in overtime.
You picked all 32 games correctly on Thursday and Friday, kept rolling on Saturday, going 4-for-4 so far, and for that, we commend you.
Binder, 23, told Yahoo Sports that "I did all my picks in under five minutes."
He picked Mercer because "Duke was soft all year and they live and die by the 3 ball. Mercer has that chemistry."
Let's go Shockers!Here we go... Kentucky, with all that young talent, vs the WS Shockers.
Wichita St is freaking NAILS from behind the arc. DAMN!man, this wichita/uk game is high intensity
I think it's consistent with the in-breeding thing.The thing I'll never understand is why the SEC roots and pulls for SEC teams in the tournament. I'm sure as hell not going to pull for Kansas when we are in recruiting battles with them. Something I've never understood about the SEC.
nice jinxWichita St is freaking NAILS from behind the arc. DAMN!
Sounds about right. It makes absolutely zero sense to me. You want your competition to lose. If Kentucky, Tennessee and Florida keep winning that's going to give them a huge edge with recruits. I guess if you like hurting your own program, you would want your in conference foes to win in the tournament.I think it's consistent with the in-breeding thing.