By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!It was horrible. Gray couldn't hold on to the ball and once again the defense was exposed. I'm so mad I can't talk.... Living off Sudafed and Bourbon until midnight.....So, anybody feel decent about our team after that shit show that was just on national television against a team that lost to an FCS team?
Couple of things. I can see fans being disrespectful but when a man who used to be in a position of power says such outrageous bullshit, is there any wonder Agies are idiots and are driven to have sex with farm animals? I think not.[tweet]385962242618834944[/tweet]
The fact of the matter is that a 1 point win against a team deemed the worst in the Big 12 and has a loss to an FCS team is no better than a loss... Mack should catch just as much shit for this win as he would if they'd lost.Couple of things. I can see fans being disrespectful but when a man who used to be in a position of power says such outrageous bull$#@!, is there any wonder Agies are idiots and are driven to have sex with farm animals? I think not.
.................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .......
Second..I spent two hours watching and re-watching the fumble/non fumble. In this clip watch how Gray's knee could have touched the ground. The view is blocked by a lineman.
http://cdn1.sbnation.com/assets/3335501/texasfumble_medium.gif
It is easy to see how the refs, on the field, missed the call. There is a ton of bodies, and all they saw was a guy come out of the pile with the ball, but clearly after the whistle had been blown. They called Gray down by contact and sent the decision up to the booth.
Here is where it gets tricky. The booth has to have indisputable evidence to overturn a call on the field. In this case there is a brief moment where Gray's knee could have touched. It looked like it did not, but it was so close, there is no way to be certain some part of his body did not touch the ground? Based on this I determined it was the correct call.
If you get a chance to watch it again, notice how there is a brief second where Gray's knee could have went down? This gives the benefit of the doubt to the original call. There are simply too many bodies in the pile to make a definitive ruling. Again it has to be definitive evidence to overturn a call.
I just watched ESPN update the call, and they used the same logic I did, proving nothing except the original call was probably wrong but the call being upheld by review reflects the rule behind instant replay.
One last thing. OU and Agie still suck!![]()
The ruling made on the goal line play was that the runner was down by rule with the ball. Because of that ruling, instant replay is allowed to review the play, which it did. Had the ruling on the field been forward progress, the play would not be reviewable because the goal line was not involved. The Replay Official looked at all five views available for this play: Line Feed, Goal Line cart, Press Box angle, Sky Cam, and Opposite End Zone camera. He correctly determined there was no indisputable video evidence to confirm that either the ruling on the field was correct, or that the ball was loose prior to the runner being down. By rule when there is not indisputable video evidence to confirm or change the call on the field, the ruling stands.
On this play, the covering official ruled the runner was down and still had control of the ball. There is no question the runner ends up on the ground, and there is no question that eventually an Iowa State player ends up with the ball. However, after reviewing the video evidence it is impossible to tell with certainty when the runner loses control of the ball and at that point was he down or not.
No, but Im going to add this into a new thread with another doozie I heard today.Anyone else heard the rumor about Mack demanding more money for a contract buyout?