Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

**Running College Football Updates Thread**

Hope staff are looking at it. While they are looking evaluating other teams are signing the top players

Maybe Sark is waiting for some more of Bama's rejects.

 
Thats comedy How many championships did Patterson win with  these players? Texcoyote gave some good infro. on TCU using the portal And your self mentioned offence change.

I am sure you have seen coaches make big difference

 My senior year Clarksville got a new coach. They won district first time since 1932 or 15 Years Won next year and moved up. Briles at Mt. Vernon is later example

Some coaches do a better job than others. Should not say this but how well did Sark do his first year?

 
I looked and it showed TCU brought in 14 portal guys last cycle. Most if not all of them are starters or heavy contributors. I would imagine if I checked Tech, Kansas, Kansas St and probably a lot of others are using the portal to get better quicker. 
I hope Sark and staff are doing all they can in the portal. Most every team, I am sure would rather build from high school recruiting but when you’re down and need to get better quickly you need to work the portal. I would say we haven’t had great success in the portal. 
For as far back as Mack Brown days I always remember hearing Texas is so young. Strong came along and ran off 13 and recruited pretty good but we were still young. Herman came in and recruited good but not at all positions so we were still young. Sark comes in and has 30 something new on the roster so we’re still young. I say all this to say we need balance recruiting and portal so we aren’t starting a bunch of freshman. We have alot of 18 year olds playing against 22-23 year olds. It makes a difference unless you’re named Kelvin Banks but unfortunately there aren’t that many of those kinda guys. It’s hurt us against teams that are portal heavy Arkansas, Tech, TCU, Kansas. Just need to find a good balance. I’m sure they’re looking at this. 
but as Jim Wacker used to say on his weekly Sunday show, "the great thing about freshman and sophomore's is that they grow up to be juniors and seniors"

Very few players ever make it to their senior year anymore because if they are any good they turn pro after their junior year and now with the extra covid year you got guys playing in their mid 20's

 
but as Jim Wacker used to say on his weekly Sunday show, "the great thing about freshman and sophomore's is that they grow up to be juniors and seniors"

Very few players ever make it to their senior year anymore because if they are any good they turn pro after their junior year and now with the extra covid year you got guys playing in their mid 20's
Or if a kid doesn’t start he wants to transfer now. It is a different game now on developing and keeping a winning football team.

 
Thats comedy How many championships did Patterson win with  these players? Texcoyote gave some good infro. on TCU using the portal And your self mentioned offence change.

I am sure you have seen coaches make big difference

 My senior year Clarksville got a new coach. They won district first time since 1932 or 15 Years Won next year and moved up. Briles at Mt. Vernon is later example

Some coaches do a better job than others. Should not say this but how well did Sark do his first year?
Read my post again. I think my point was that Dykes' offensive know-how made it come together, but that was Patterson's team and talent. Coaching made a difference.

You're attempting to argue a point that I had already made.

Texas added portal players, too. Some would say better players than TCU got. I don't think there's a point to make or see there.

 
I believe it was a series of fortuitous events that made the TCU thing happen.  It’s not because Dykes is a genius or because they have the best player talent in the country.  It is a combination and confluence of many things that have created their success this year. Would they be where they are if Sark was the head coach? Who can say?  Hypotheticals cannot be determined with any degree of certainty.  
 

I see TCU players believing in their coaches and each other which has created a team unity where everyone is pulling in the same direction.  In the end the players have to make the plays to be successful.  Up til now they have been able to make just enough plays to be in the championship final.  Sometimes Cinderella stories happen and the specific reason can’t be found it just is.  That is what makes it a Cinderella story.

 
We get it you don’t like Sark.

No point in trying to camouflage it.
I have nothing against Sarkproably anice guy

As acoach he has not coached up to what most hought he would.

Bad regresion first year. Improvement second year butstill not as good as we had.

Do not dislike him but very disapointed in coaching.Has he met your expections?

 
Some how my post disappeared If thinking several coaches have done a betterjob of coaching than Sark means I dislike him so be it. 

If saying TCU's Play caller gets credit along with Dykes means Idislike sark so be it.

Did you saying Blue does not practice well (not exact words)  mean you dislike him? Have a good  newYear.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom