beevomav
V.I.P.
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2011
- Messages
- 2,956
When the penalties were levied against Penn State a lot of folks applauded the decision. At the time I worried about setting precedents. It was hard to have a conversation about the penalties because emotions were so raw.
One of the things that worried me was the huge fines. Now the NCAA being like most every other entity, likes money. I kept hearing how the $60 million was because of the egregious nature of the offense. Well now there seems to be a slippery slope to hell for universities.
This from a story from ESPN: INDIANAPOLIS -- Nearly a year after promising to impose harsher sanctions on the most egregious rule-breakers, NCAA leaders endorsed a proposal Thursday that would make schools subject to the same crippling penalties just handed to Penn State.
A program found to have made a "serious breach of conduct" with aggravating circumstances could face postseason bans of two to four years. In addition, the program may have to return money from specific events or a series of events or the amount of gross revenue generated by the sport during the years in which sanctions occurred --fines that could cost a school millions of dollars
That last part is what has me concerned. Who gets the money and when millions of dollars in fines are involved, there is always an incentive to go overboard.
I am not suggesting that it ought to be business as usual but I am just concerned and warn the school Presidents and Regents who voted for stiffer penalties to be careful what you wish for. With the lauguage I have seen, all it takes is a rouge assistant coach or alumni to put a team in the same hell as Penn State for not near the severity of the offense.
Here is the link to the ESPN story: http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/8227082/ncaa-board-directors-endorses-new-penalty-structure
One of the things that worried me was the huge fines. Now the NCAA being like most every other entity, likes money. I kept hearing how the $60 million was because of the egregious nature of the offense. Well now there seems to be a slippery slope to hell for universities.
This from a story from ESPN: INDIANAPOLIS -- Nearly a year after promising to impose harsher sanctions on the most egregious rule-breakers, NCAA leaders endorsed a proposal Thursday that would make schools subject to the same crippling penalties just handed to Penn State.
A program found to have made a "serious breach of conduct" with aggravating circumstances could face postseason bans of two to four years. In addition, the program may have to return money from specific events or a series of events or the amount of gross revenue generated by the sport during the years in which sanctions occurred --fines that could cost a school millions of dollars
That last part is what has me concerned. Who gets the money and when millions of dollars in fines are involved, there is always an incentive to go overboard.
I am not suggesting that it ought to be business as usual but I am just concerned and warn the school Presidents and Regents who voted for stiffer penalties to be careful what you wish for. With the lauguage I have seen, all it takes is a rouge assistant coach or alumni to put a team in the same hell as Penn State for not near the severity of the offense.
Here is the link to the ESPN story: http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/8227082/ncaa-board-directors-endorses-new-penalty-structure