Chatsports.com saban article

[txscallywag]

SHHHH, none of this happened....

 

[jw43]

This is interesting reading - linked at the bottom of that article: http://www.chatsports.com/tex...ban-10-136-666

 

[Alouha27]

This is interesting reading - linked at the bottom of that article: http://www.chatsports.com/tex...ban-10-136-666

Your link isn't working.

 

[Fatherof5]

http://http://www.chatsports.com/texas-longhorns/a/Exclusive-Why-Texas-Was-So-Sure-Theyd-Get-Nick-Saban-10-136-666
Here is the saban article.

I tried to give ya a like for that link, but my like button is gone tonight. Not sure how true it all is, but it was a fascinating read and I'd never heard of the site. The site itself is interesting.

 

[Alouha27]

I tried to give ya a like for that link, but my like button is gone tonight. Not sure how true it all is, but it was a fascinating read and I'd never heard of the site. The site itself is interesting.

I ran across the site on twitter earlier today. Never heard of it and have no clue how accurate their info is. It seems to make sense and had some information that I haven't heard yet but I really do not know if it is true.

 

[burntorange20]

View attachment 445

 

[HornNdriftwood]

There's some obvious mistakes in the timeline and the interpretation.

It seems they culled IT, OB and 247 for their info and put it into chronological order. It fits because it's what we've all been reading for the last 10 months.

 

[Alouha27]

There's some obvious mistakes in the timeline and the interpretation. It seems they culled IT, OB and 247 for their info and put it into chronological order. It fits because it's what we've all been reading for the last 10 months.

So you think the "let's talk after Jan 2nd" is made up by the site to boost their site views?

 

[HookemDTX]

lol Clarence Hill is even Tweeting the article now.

 

[HornNdriftwood]

So you think the "let's talk after Jan 2nd" is made up by the site to boost their site views?

There's multiple threads on the sites I mentioned about the Saban possibility still having legs. The 1/2 date would then make since because it's right after the Sugar Bowl. Made up or speculation?

Potayto Potahto

Maybe they have an inside source but it says written by Staff. So with no name, no way to judge credibility since I'd never heard of the site before.

 

[pringlelake]

There's some obvious mistakes in the timeline and the interpretation. It seems they culled IT, OB and 247 for their info and put it into chronological order. It fits because it's what we've all been reading for the last 10 months.

very true

 

[The Tower]

so anyways, about saban...

 

[Topstarr]

I just do not feel like we can take this to the Bank or the time line.

 

[Alouha27]

Wow I saw this article all over twitter today. Most Bama fans think its BS and written by a Longhorn fan and most Texas fans hope it's legit! All I could find about chatsports.com is they are out of San Francisco.