Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

2023 Recruiting Board/Thread

9 minutes ago, TFloss32 said:


This could explain the 35 or 36 number from Sark, assuming he was confident it would happen. 

This seems like a big deal , particularly for teams that had lots of portal losses. 

 
This could explain the 35 or 36 number from Sark, assuming he was confident it would happen. 

This seems like a big deal , particularly for teams that had lots of portal losses. 
I like this combined with tighter portal windows to help with roster management.

Hopefully that includes increasing the number of transfers allowed in, which is capped at seven right now regardless of how many players you lose.

 
I like this combined with tighter portal windows to help with roster management.

Hopefully that includes increasing the number of transfers allowed in, which is capped at seven right now regardless of how many players you lose.
Isn't the real limit 25+7 total new players?, so if no 25 limit I was assuming that the only limit is the 85 total.

 
The 7 extra ships were aone time only option.
I understand that is/was the official position,  but considering the popularity of the portal its difficult for me to imagine that they would have moved back to a 25 total for high school signers plus portal athletes. 

Obviously things are very dynamic and they are making it up as they go along. 

 
I understand that is/was the official position,  but considering the popularity of the portal its difficult for me to imagine that they would have moved back to a 25 total for high school signers plus portal athletes. 

Obviously things are very dynamic and they are making it up as they go along. 
I think the removal of the 25/7 limit is for a two year trial. Something needs to be put in place or what we saw happen to the LSU basketball team will occur much more frequently.

 
The rule they passed said onetime only! They can pass anotherif they choose.

First time rule failed two weeks later it passed. Iffootball as we know it is to suvive some things will have to change.

 
The rule they passed said onetime only! They can pass anotherif they choose.

First time rule failed two weeks later it passed. Iffootball as we know it is to suvive some things will have to change.
If voted in it will be for two years.

 
I think the removal of the 25/7 limit is for a two year trial. Something needs to be put in place or what we saw happen to the LSU basketball team will occur much more frequently.
Someone earlier argued we needed to treat the players like employees and pay them what they are worth.  Why stop there?  Why not let a school employ as many athletes as they want?  Why not allow them to contact other “employees” at other schools and hire them anytime they want?   Alls fair in love and NIL correct? 

 
Someone earlier argued we needed to treat the players like employees and pay them what they are worth.  Why stop there?  Why not let a school employ as many athletes as they want?  Why not allow them to contact other “employees” at other schools and hire them anytime they want?   Alls fair in love and NIL correct? 
Doesn't that bring in contracts, unions and CBA's? Not to mention politics since the players become state employees.

 
Doesn't that bring in contracts, unions and CBA's? Not to mention politics since the players become state employees.
I am not saying that making them employees is the way to go, but if you did, you would have binding contracts, a union, a CBA and some of what we are seeing currently could actually be controlled. You could set limits on number of employees (see NFL roster limits), you could actually have some ability to penalize tampering.

As it stands, the student athletes don't have the benefits or the restrictions of a contract or employment. The NCAA was previously restricting their actions (transfers, NIL) without giving them a fair value in return. Supreme Court deemed this to be unconstitutional.

 
I am not saying that making them employees is the way to go, but if you did, you would have binding contracts, a union, a CBA and some of what we are seeing currently could actually be controlled. You could set limits on number of employees (see NFL roster limits), you could actually have some ability to penalize tampering.

As it stands, the student athletes don't have the benefits or the restrictions of a contract or employment. The NCAA was previously restricting their actions (transfers, NIL) without giving them a fair value in return. Supreme Court deemed this to be unconstitutional.
You would be forced to have contracts because as USC and Alabama have shown, boosters will always tamper. NCAA has no teeth. 

 
Back
Top Bottom