I am sure bag men exist but why isnt there any proof of it. I mean come on you pay a kid 100k, coach bitches the kid out a year later, like Moore, then why wouldnt he just spill the beans on the school as he hits the portal. Doesnt make any sense to me. Wouldnt the recruit hold massive leverage over the school afterwards? Better play me when I want coach or else.
Sometimes I wonder if we all just use this as an excuse for not having the #3 class in the given year to make us feel better about losing this recruit or that one. Maybe a 4-8 season and losing to Kansas has something to do with it.
I do realize it does happen. My father in law is a booster for Bama, not necessarily a BMD but he has seen them get paid there even years ago. We pretend we are above that and maybe we are but do you guys really think that doesnt happen here? I have my doubts. So some teenager turns away big money to play for a 4-8 team whose coach is constantly on the hotseat?