RANDOLPH DUKE THE AGS LOVE YOU

[J.B. TexasEx]

I would be pleased to offer you tickets in the fall to see first hand the "ugly" stadium you have never seen, the wall of titles, and even Reveille up close. I will throw in a tailgate with beer and BBQ and great fun conversation. You can wear as much orange as you prefer and I guarantee you will have a great time and have first hand knowledge of how sincere and honest at least this group of Aggies are. PM me for details.

LOL..."wall of titles". aggy funny

 

[Bear19]

Wall of titties would be much more fun. Even if they are fake, too.

 

[Randolph Duke]

I don't categorize all Aggies just as I don't all UT grads. The interesting part about this is there isn't anything invested in "RandolphDuke" A majority of Ags I have spoken too have no idea whom I am referring to and laugh when I explain to them of Rd's crusade of revoking the 12th Man TM while also having the bar cards of several attorneys including the AG and Judge Lake. I spoke yesterday to a colleague who is a well known trademark attorney that I know Charles has experience with and she thought the whole threatening nature....humorous! The real sense of humor is that a maximum of 7 internet experts will be reading this! 

You guys are hilarious. I would love to hear how you explain all this to other people. I'm sure you don't come close to honestly discussing the facts or the relative arguments. The good thing is that soon the facts will be presented by a disinterested third party after full legal review and professional fact checking.

As far as the legal determination of your aggy friends, none of their opinions will matter. This needs to be referred to the Texas Attorney General to let the AG decide to proceed. And that will happen in due course. Hopefully, this will see the inside of a courtroom and a competent jurist, requiring factual pleadings for a change, will offer a legal opinion. While poultry science majors are the cream of the intellectual crop in aggyland, outside the aggy culture, people go to competent jurists when they want legal opinions and to poultry farmers when they want chickenshit. Your chickenshit comments really don't carry much weight.

And as far as your aggy investigative skills that landed you on the determination you know who Randolph Duke is, you will have to forgive me as I laugh at your super sleuthing that has determined your 12th Man tradition as you tell it today is 100% accurate and Randolph Duke is a convicted child molester with unlimited internet access while in state prison. Yea, you guys have it all figured out.

 

[The Bry-Man81]

Nm

 

[drivebyag]

Again for all of you that follow Charles and worship every word he says, follow the obsessiveness and ludicrous accusations he makes. Has anything changed since his original 'investigation' started? Has Charles made any changes to the protection of the trademark 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051 et seq.? Has Judge Lake lost his appointment? John Cain lost his card? John Sharp been removed? 

If Charles was sincere that he concerned about fraud in the state of Texas and was so sure of his 'research' then he would have bet me with real cash. Instead he does what he always does and changes the narrative and bloviates about his theories!

I know Charles won't be having a cigar but I will with a steak tonight! have a great weekend fellow Texans!

 

[Randolph Duke]

Um, pray tell, who the hell is Charles?

Back when the Wall Street Journal article came out in 2014, the super sleuth ags determined Randolph Duke was some Charles guy who was a convicted child molester serving 12 years in TDCJ.

Why they thought the state would give unlimited internet access to such a person is something only the farm school mentality would be able to rationalize. Since then, they have stalked some woman in Frisco, innocent little kids at various elementary schools in Houston, made endless death threats directed at Randolph Duke and pretty much acted like any of us would expect aggys to act. All just because they believe that if you can't disprove someone's intellectual argument, personal violence is the next best option.

Remember, in this entire episode, the ags are the victims for the lies they themselves told about their own cherished "tradition," Randolph Duke must meet with physical violence to allow the ags to obtain revenge for their own stupidity and they are highly educated intellectuals, the cradle of the nation's CEO's and practically an Ivy League institution.

Texas A&M. Real football. Real tradition. 

 

[MBHORNSFAN]

So Charlie Strong is Randolph Duke?  h34r:

 

[Sirhornsalot]

So Charlie Strong is Randolph Duke?  h34r:

No, no, no. He's David Hasselhoff

 

[Randolph Duke]

No, no, no. He's Scott Baio

Just don't say I'm David Hasselhoff.

 

[Sirhornsalot]

Honestly, he's a friggin bonafide shape-shifter. You can't stop him. You can only hope to contain him.

 

[MikeV73]

LOL..."wall of titles". aggy funny

I noticed no aggie defense comments were made regarding the ridiculously claimed titles that were claimed after leaving the Big 12.

 

[J.B. TexasEx]

I noticed no aggie defense comments were made regarding the ridiculously claimed titles that were claimed after leaving the Big 12.

How do you defend the indefensible?

No aggy has successfully countered Duke's claim that their cherished 12th Man story is a contrived fairy tale either. They may be right about him not being successful with his fraudulent trademark filing claim, but I guess we'll see in time. It's just fun to witness their angst and vitriol towards him. Classic aggy

 

[MBHORNSFAN]

 

[J.B. TexasEx]

 

[Randolph Duke]

http://www.texasmonthly.com/the-daily-post/12th-man-tradition/

Here is the story.

 

[BeardedTexan]

So, no fraud. It doesn’t matter if Gill was the only sub or not, or when the tradition was born. The Aggies own the marks, and that’s that. (Three other IP attorneys I spoke to echoed Karmilovich’s views.)

Wow. That article was terrible to you and good for A&M. Not sure how could spin it otherwise.

 

[tejasrulz]

Wow. That article was terrible to you and good for A&M. Not sure how could spin it otherwise.

That's how I took it too. However it does state that aggy wasn't the first to use it and their sacred fabled tradition may be just that, a fable. Like I stated earlier, they didn't invent it, they were just the first to trademark it.

 

[drgilbert]

Duke, it looks like you are spinning your wheels on the trademark aspect of this. In doing so the fact that the tradition might be based on lies has been lost with all the legal jargon. I think if you continue to chase this you should focus on busting the myth not the trademark. Good luck.

 

[Randolph Duke]

Wow. That article was terrible to you and good for A&M. Not sure how could spin it otherwise.

Try not adding any spin, for once.

I have never said I thought anything would ever change the opinion of those who have long worshiped the fairy tale that is the TAMU 12th Man "tradition." The question is whether the school can continue to claim the trademark was adopted in 1922 when Gill himself claims it originated in 1939 and that before then he hadn't heard of any 12th Man "tradition" on campus prior to 1939. If the school can no longer claim the tradition originated in 1922, is there any basis for them having ever claimed it originated in1922.

The only opinion that matters on whether the university has acted unlawfully or not is that of the Texas Attorney General.  I am confident we will have that opinion soon.

One thing I will never understand is why the ags refuse to be honest with the public about the origins of their traditions. Why is it that the last options the aggys choose every time are the option to act honestly and with integrity. Beard, my friend, maybe you can explain it to me.

 

[BeardedTexan]

“Defrauding the Trademark Office is a very big deal, but it would be very hard to say that somebody intentionally knew that they were making a misstatement and lying to the Trademark Office,†Karmilovch says.

Doesn't matter, not fraud.