Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

My 2 Cents on South Bend

LinuxHorn

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
284
I just wanted to drop off my 2 cents on the game. I played quite a bit of ball back in the day as a running back (having played with Vince in middle and high school). I've been in the "patience" camp as it pertains to Charlie Strong turning Texas around. I know he was/is fighting an uphill battle given the environment and players he was left in the MB fiasco. I always viewed this as getting worse before it got better and we were 2-3 years minimum away from competing with the big boys. What happened yesterday, in some ways, was expected but it still hurts when you sit through it. While we played like a deuce from a great dane, they were simply the better team (returning something like 18 starters I think). It was obvious they were a much more cohesive unit. I know we were playing young guys and we were going into South Bend for our first game. I expected a lot of mistakes. I was ok with getting it out the way early for conference play where we can salvage the season. Here are my quick notes from the game:

DEFENSE

- Malik anybody? Dude flashed so much potential. He is living up to the hype in game 1. There were a lot of freshman mistakes and he could've been much better in pass coverage, but he definitely gives you something to look forward to on defense. He's also a very natural leader. His quick interview post game showed his maturation.

- Duke and Dylan. Dylan and Duke. By the time you finish reading this sentence, Notre Dame is already 5 - 10 yards behind them moonwalking into the endzone. I praise Dylan for his hard work. He turned walk on status into scholarship player. I also condemn him because he just doesn't have the playmaking ability we need in a safety. He was consistently late to the party and is the last line of defense. Thomas is a senior and we should expect more from him. He's consistently getting beat deep. He rarely keeps the WR in front of him. 

- We should be concerned about the DL. They got zero push. Zaire had enough time to go to the sideline, make some mai tai's, pass them out to the team, and then come back in to complete passes in the middle of the field all day long. He was never under any real pressure.

- Bedford's soft 2 deep zone was supposed to keep everything in front. That didn't work out too well. A lot of guys were out of position, but the middle of the field was consistently open. Once a RB was pass the LOS, he was instantly in the secondary. 

- Bonney had a tough night as well. I believe we should start playing guys like Boyd and live with the growing pains. Upperclassmen should be better. Period. 

OFFENSE

- Swoopes is who we thought he was. Nothing more. Nothing less. Physically, he's slow. Mentally, he's slow at decision making. He holds the ball far too long. He's a great kid, but he's not the future at QB. He can be a serviceable backup. 

- Heard. We don't know much about him yet given his short stint on the field. He did look quick on his feet. I believe that hit he took was a little more than wind knocked out of him based on re-watching it. Once he got up, he looked a bit shaken. The coaches can say what they want, but I personally believe they didn't put him back in for health reasons. Anything else is pure insanity. While he also may not be the answer to our QB problems, he is a different option. I'm just tired of seeing Swoopes repeat the same mistakes over and over after a full year of being the starter. It's time to live with Heards mistakes if he can at least show growth

- OL. Sigh. Wickline's seat should be warming up. He shouldn't get a pass. The OL looks worse than Colt McCoy circa 2007. No matter how much switching he does on the oline, they look the same. Turrible, just turrible. Starting 2 true freshman tells you a lot about the veterans. At least those freshman showed some signs of ability. Other times, they looked like true freshmen making their first start. 

- It's elementary Watson! I've seen enough to know he should not be the OC for Texas. I waited a long time to pass judgement, but there were A LOT of signs last night that suggest he isn't. His play calling are like picking names out of a hat. You get a beautiful pitch and catch from Swoopes/Burt and your next 2 plays are right up the middle back to back? No misdirection at all. It's 3rd and short and you have 1 route within 5 yards. We all know our weaknesses. It's his job to play to our strengths. He doesn't. He makes things much more complicated than they need to be. He hit lightening in a bottle with Bridgewater, but most successful college qb's are playing in a more simplified offense which allows them to use their athletic ability and cut down on overthinking things. One read, two read, check down, run. 

- I see a lot of potential in the RB's. Gray is running harder through tackles. Foreman and Warren flashed potential as well. Get them a serviceable OL and we may have something

- We didn't really throw (er...complete) a lot of passes. It was a combination of poor oline play, Swoopes holding on to the ball, and WR's not getting open. John Burt did flash some potential. Bright future ahead. 

SPECIAL TEAMS

- The punter was up and down, but did show us his big leg. If he can become consistent, he will be a plus.

- Traylor has improved special teams coverage. That's all we can ask of him in that regard.

- It's good to know Rose is capable of hitting from 50+ 

While this was not a great start, a lot of it was expected. My biggest concerns going forward is the OL, QB play, and offensive play calling. Why? Because I don't know if they will change much throughout the season. CS sticking with Watson who's sticking with Swoopes is destined for failure. Strong mentioned last night in his press conference he wasn't paying much attention to that side of the ball because he was trying to fix the defense. News flash coach, your offense is much more of a problem than the defense and you are responsible for BOTH! I like Strong and want him to succeed at Texas for a variety of reasons. I also think it's time for him to put a lot more focus on that side of the ball and start making some changes. He can't bet his career on "Watson" at the roulette table. 

Rant over! Enjoy your Sunday/Monday fellas. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks LH. Good insight on what we all saw last night. I have been in the "patient" camp but I awoke troubled this morning. The offense is the same old thing as last year. My concern is that it will not change. Watson can call it a "spread" but it is not. I was concerned when they said they were going to the spread as Watson is not a spread guy. You don't just become proficient at it over night. This is my first Watson "bashing" comment but I do not feel he has demonstrated anything to get excited about. So many of us were looking for a spark of something last night. Anything! As a former player and coach it was frustrated to watch so many blown assignments on both sides of the ball.

My main concern is I hope they haven't lost the players. That is the kind of loss that can be tough to rebound from.

My 2 cents. Throw the young ones out there, take your lumps, go compete. Can't be any worse than last night.

Monday is a new week. Sun comes up. Rice coming to town. Hook 'em

 
Agree with all except Rose he hit 2 out of 3 from over 50 yds. Just did not count on scoreboard.

 
Both great posts. My biggest concern was definitely play calling....there are very few play calls designed to get playmakers in space. I think I remember 2 tunnel screens to Daje and that's about it. JGray is running tough like he needs to, but we need to get him in space too.

On defense, pass rushing had no push and Zaire picked apart the zone. I know the game plan involved making him beat us through the air....well, he did. I wouldn't have minded at least trying to man up and be physical while throwing some pressure. At least we wouldn't have been trying the same thing and expecting it to magically work.

Best case scenario, maybe ND really is that good. I guess we'll see how the next few games play out.

 
Thanks LH. Good insight on what we all saw last night. I have been in the "patient" camp but I awoke troubled this morning. The offense is the same old thing as last year. My concern is that it will not change. Watson can call it a "spread" but it is not. I was concerned when they said they were going to the spread as Watson is not a spread guy. You don't just become proficient at it over night. This is my first Watson "bashing" comment but I do not feel he has demonstrated anything to get excited about. So many of us were looking for a spark of something last night. Anything! As a former player and coach it was frustrated to watch so many blown assignments on both sides of the ball.

My main concern is I hope they haven't lost the players. That is the kind of loss that can be tough to rebound from.

My 2 cents. Throw the young ones out there, take your lumps, go compete. Can't be any worse than last night.

Monday is a new week. Sun comes up. Rice coming to town. Hook 'em
That's exactly where I am right now. I'd rather lose making freshman mistakes with freshman, then seeing juniors and seniors continue to be severely ineffective. Inject some passion with these young kids. This may sound crazy, but I'm tired of losing the exact same way. The defense is on the field too long, OL sucks, Swoopes being indecisive and slow, after a big play we shat the bed on O, poor play calling, yadda yadda. 

 
I hate that rule of letting the oppositing coach of "icing" the kicker a couple of seconds before he kicks. I don't mind as much if it is before they line up, but not right as they are going to kick. It is what it is, but just don't like it.

 
How appropriate would it be to have a former Slippery Rock coach as a coach of the Texas Longhorns!

 
Ok...so our O line is bad and can't sustain a block long enough for our QB to roll out or drop back...........We can fix that with a little "Mike Leach offense"...Dink and dunk. Get rid of the ball before  the pass rush can get to the QB. Widen splits like Mizzou used to do to keep outside rush from getting to QB and create holes for RBs before the ball is even snapped. That helps our weak OL and allows our QBs to have a little time to throw.  Keeps LBs from blitzing all the time, and backs them off the LOS so our backs can have room to run. LB comes on a blitz, replace him with a TE or slot and dink the ball to them....

Our defense is bad as well.....Yes, our offense keeps them on the field, but they don't do themselves any favors by giving up chunks on third downs when they could get off the field. 

The flats are constantly open, we allow QBs and backs to get outside our helmet on the edge all the time.

Is our secondary that bad or do we need Akina back ?

We had two players playing defense last night........Hughes and Jefferson.

From the ND game it looks like we have a new NCAA.....#66.....SMH...At least Cam Hughes could run block.

Wickline is either not cracked up to what he was supposed to be, or the lawsuit has him preoccupied. The OL doesn't look any better than last year.

If I'm Patterson I tell Charlie to get it fixed NOW or get a new staff for next season....

Even Ricky Williams, Young, and Thomas were ripping on this staff last night on LHN in their subtle way.....

this is TEXAS....no excuse for this, especially for as long as it has lingered. Everyone I talked to on flights back from Chicago were all fed up with the direction we seem to be going..which is nowhere in a hurry.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom