TexasFirst1
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2013
- Messages
- 190
Relax everybody!! All is well!! UT has a great football leadership tradition!!!
UT football timeline.
1971 - 1997 - Zero MNCs - 5 head coaches - 7 Conference championships
1998 - 2013 - 1 MNC - 2 conference championships
2010 - 2013 - Bill Powers and Deloss Dodds coddle Mack Brown's sensibilities for four years while Mack posts a poor record and wrecks recruiting.
2013 - Powers hires Patterson over 100 other ADs in the FBS who had more experience and qualifications.
2013 - Powers and Patterson botch the Mack Brown termination.
2013 - Powers and Patterson decide not to deal with any of of Jimmy Sexton's clients because Sexton talked to UT boosters in early 2013 about "Mack's job".
2013 - Powers and Patterson do not interview ANY tier one head football coaches before picking third tier Charlie Strong.
2013 - Strong promises to deliver a first rate coaching staff to UT.
2014 - Strong fails to convince any top tier coordinators to join his staff despite the clear need to get an OC that will excite recruits and validate his judgment.
2014 - Strong makes comfort hires of the Louisville OC and DC despite the consistently poor performance of the Louisville offense against lesser opposition, even with Bridgewater.
There is no way to spin the realities above as anything more than poor leadership, especially at the Powers and Patterson level. Better hiring alternatives have been ignored or rejected Ut at every level of this process. UT has settled for third tier hires at AD, HC and OC. Is this the optimum outcome for UT and a reason to expect above third tier performance levels on the field in the future? Are these hires a sound basis for optimism about the future or a foundation of continuing underachievement, ineptitude and wishful thinking? Do these hires maximize optimism and enthusiasm among recruits and the fan base???
These outcomes are especially disheartening because there were no limitations on resources and this was a vital crossroads for UT football. A chance to end 40+ years of mediocrity. It may miraculously work out in the end but, if it does, it will be in spite of leadership ineptitude, not because of professional leadership that made the best choices available.
Yeah, the acquiescent fans can look the other way and hope for the best and criticize anyone who cares enough to call out the amateurs of Bellmont... Clap, clap, clap.... The only people who should be happy about this feckless process are UT's adversaries.
UT football timeline.
1971 - 1997 - Zero MNCs - 5 head coaches - 7 Conference championships
1998 - 2013 - 1 MNC - 2 conference championships
2010 - 2013 - Bill Powers and Deloss Dodds coddle Mack Brown's sensibilities for four years while Mack posts a poor record and wrecks recruiting.
2013 - Powers hires Patterson over 100 other ADs in the FBS who had more experience and qualifications.
2013 - Powers and Patterson botch the Mack Brown termination.
2013 - Powers and Patterson decide not to deal with any of of Jimmy Sexton's clients because Sexton talked to UT boosters in early 2013 about "Mack's job".
2013 - Powers and Patterson do not interview ANY tier one head football coaches before picking third tier Charlie Strong.
2013 - Strong promises to deliver a first rate coaching staff to UT.
2014 - Strong fails to convince any top tier coordinators to join his staff despite the clear need to get an OC that will excite recruits and validate his judgment.
2014 - Strong makes comfort hires of the Louisville OC and DC despite the consistently poor performance of the Louisville offense against lesser opposition, even with Bridgewater.
There is no way to spin the realities above as anything more than poor leadership, especially at the Powers and Patterson level. Better hiring alternatives have been ignored or rejected Ut at every level of this process. UT has settled for third tier hires at AD, HC and OC. Is this the optimum outcome for UT and a reason to expect above third tier performance levels on the field in the future? Are these hires a sound basis for optimism about the future or a foundation of continuing underachievement, ineptitude and wishful thinking? Do these hires maximize optimism and enthusiasm among recruits and the fan base???
These outcomes are especially disheartening because there were no limitations on resources and this was a vital crossroads for UT football. A chance to end 40+ years of mediocrity. It may miraculously work out in the end but, if it does, it will be in spite of leadership ineptitude, not because of professional leadership that made the best choices available.
Yeah, the acquiescent fans can look the other way and hope for the best and criticize anyone who cares enough to call out the amateurs of Bellmont... Clap, clap, clap.... The only people who should be happy about this feckless process are UT's adversaries.