Lukus Alderman
Moderator
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2013
- Messages
- 2,406
I was watching "Strong" on LHN last week and I noticed a segment of the show where they talked about Strong turning down the TN job that was offered to him last year. They interviewed Lou Holtz and he said that the main reason that Strong gave was that Bridgewater was coming back and that he owed it to him and the rest of the team to join him.
While that sounds like a noble reason for him declining an SEC HC position that was once a top program, I have other thoughts as to why he turned it down.
1. I feel that he saw the roster at utk and realized that it was going to be a long-term fix. Let's be honest, Dooley was neither a great coach nor a great recruiter. He just wasn't cut out for it and it cost the Volunteers years and years of potential with the quality of players that were recruited. The effects of this bring me to my second point.
2. I don't believe that Strong would have a lot of time to rebuild. At Texas, the roster may be short on talent at various positions, but Mack did recruit well and has a good core of football players that will be able to generate 7-10 wins this season. If he were at TN, the heat and pressure to get them to a bowl game in year one would be just half of the problem. Expectations at Texas are high, but I'm not sure the fans in Austin are as unreasonable and lack basic football knowledge as the fans in Knoxville. I'm talking about fans that believe that if Peyton Manning was the head coach this year, the Volunteers would be in the national championship. That's not even touching on the fact that race would be a factor in whether or not Strong would be accepted here. Heck, the Vols' black HC took them to the sweet 16 this year and they rejoiced after the tourney when he packed his bags and left for another job.
While I believe that Strong is a good coach and will bring a solid season in year one, I think he made the right choice to turn down an SEC job and gamble. It obviously paid off, but even if he didn't make it to Austin, Louisville would've been a better place for him this year than Knoxville.
While that sounds like a noble reason for him declining an SEC HC position that was once a top program, I have other thoughts as to why he turned it down.
1. I feel that he saw the roster at utk and realized that it was going to be a long-term fix. Let's be honest, Dooley was neither a great coach nor a great recruiter. He just wasn't cut out for it and it cost the Volunteers years and years of potential with the quality of players that were recruited. The effects of this bring me to my second point.
2. I don't believe that Strong would have a lot of time to rebuild. At Texas, the roster may be short on talent at various positions, but Mack did recruit well and has a good core of football players that will be able to generate 7-10 wins this season. If he were at TN, the heat and pressure to get them to a bowl game in year one would be just half of the problem. Expectations at Texas are high, but I'm not sure the fans in Austin are as unreasonable and lack basic football knowledge as the fans in Knoxville. I'm talking about fans that believe that if Peyton Manning was the head coach this year, the Volunteers would be in the national championship. That's not even touching on the fact that race would be a factor in whether or not Strong would be accepted here. Heck, the Vols' black HC took them to the sweet 16 this year and they rejoiced after the tourney when he packed his bags and left for another job.
While I believe that Strong is a good coach and will bring a solid season in year one, I think he made the right choice to turn down an SEC job and gamble. It obviously paid off, but even if he didn't make it to Austin, Louisville would've been a better place for him this year than Knoxville.