Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

Weekend Series – #7 Texas vs Mizzou

Burns hasnt ever been considered the closer type. He is in the same role as Grubbs, Duplantier, and possibly Saunier. Would like to see Saunier get the game 2 start., but that doesn't seem to be Schloss and Weiner plan. I have no problem with their plan as we are off to one of our best starts in 20 yrs or so.

Riojas, Moffett, Navarre are the ones that were more likely to be closer type. Hamiltom is another one. Volantis is the closest we have.
The issue has been Mercer and McCreery haven't been able to throw strikes, thus they haven't pitched in awhile. Howard is slowly showing some promise.

Will go by what Craig/Roger and Keith say on the pitch count.

Missouri may have used 6 pitchers, but 1 was a position player and was very effective. Saving most of their other arms for Saturday.
Whats up Saunier, we haven't seen him at all in about a month?

Moffett's first appearance after opening weekend was this Tuesday. I am not sure Texas was able to fix him the way they thought they might.

Volantis and Jason Flores have been used a lot in late game, high leverage situations and have done really well.
 
29 runs in only 25 innings. Had we had all 27 innings we would have gone over 30. I'll count it as a win.
I know you’re not but almost sounds like aggy. Claiming wins when you lose. Because expecting 30 runs in three games means there’s a good chance of run rule in at least one.
 
I know you’re not but almost sounds like aggy. Claiming wins when you lose. Because expecting 30 runs in three games means there’s a good chance of run rule in at least one.

And there was, the first game of the series. I think he's just suggesting if we'd had more innings instead of run rule, Texas likely gets another run. That's fairly realistic to me.

Aggy never gets that close to the truth. lol
 
I know you’re not but almost sounds like aggy. Claiming wins when you lose. Because expecting 30 runs in three games means there’s a good chance of run rule in at least one.
Yes, but my reasoning relied on solid logic and math. An aggie could never
 
I know you’re not but almost sounds like aggy. Claiming wins when you lose. Because expecting 30 runs in three games means there’s a good chance of run rule in at least one.
BW55 is a good guy, I was just razzing him some since he did jinx himself.
 
Back
Top Bottom