Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

"Silence at Baylor"

BTW, the Baylor argument will be that they had no idea about his history of violence against women because his ex-girlfriend at Boise State didn't file a police report after the alleged abuse. In other words, there was no public record. It's not the worst defense in the world, but there's still the question: What did Baylor's coaches think he'd been dismissed for? 

Did Boise State not tell them? (I wonder if there are some privacy laws here that would have prevented them from doing so without a police report.) Or did Baylor not ask?

Personally, I don't think they knew, and I don't think they wanted to know. It was willful negligence and a young woman paid the price. 

There's also the issue where Baylor half-assed the investigation — they're fully at fault there and I don't know how they could claim otherwise.

 
There's also the issue where Baylor half-assed the investigation — they're fully at fault there and I don't know how they could claim otherwise.

This is the deal-breaker for me. This means they intentionally tried to find nothing or placed little importance on it, but I tend to think the former rather than the latter.

This means females all over Baylor were put at great risk which is a terrible testament to Baylor's priorities regarding its football program vs human rights/women's rights/victim's rights. You might want to think twice about sending your daughter to Baylor as long as it's a win at any cost situation there. Certainly Charlie's priorities are casting a huge shadow on Briles and his right about now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
BTW, the Baylor argument will be that they had no idea about his history of violence against women because his ex-girlfriend at Boise State didn't file a police report after the alleged abuse. In other words, there was no public record. It's not the worst defense in the world, but there's still the question: What did Baylor's coaches think he'd been dismissed for? 

Did Boise State not tell them? (I wonder if there are some privacy laws here that would have prevented them from doing so without a police report.) Or did Baylor not ask?

Personally, I don't think they knew, and I don't think they wanted to know. It was willful negligence and a young woman paid the price. 

There's also the issue where Baylor half-assed the investigation — they're fully at fault there and I don't know how they could claim otherwise.
Disagree I believe they knew. Not unless they're stupid.

 
This story is disgusting and disgraceful. I think they knew.

Baylor may be the next thug U.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My biggest connection with Briles (on a distant level) is more about his tenure with Stephenville than our rivalry with Baylor. I attended both Brownwood and Stephenville schools when I was younger, so Briles was a name I heard a lot. Admittedly, I've never thought of him as anything but a stand up guy. And without all of the details, I'm trying not to let that perception shift too terribly much. Although I'd admit this is something that could tear apart anyone's reputation and deservingly so. 

That said, Briles has always had a reputation for running a competitive program. Clearly he had a lot of success prior to coaching at the collegiate level. Outside of Stephenville, there was also debate about how clean of a program he was running. There were constant claims that the team was on roids, painkillers and so forth. His teams were pretty beefy back then. On the Stephenville side, the guy is revered like a football god. The Briles I heard about weekly and met a few times, doesn't seem like the kind of man that would go this far to win ball games. But this really just adds to those who have suspected Briles of winning at all costs well before this incident ever occurred. 
Back in the 90's I lived in Sherman and we played Stephenville in the playoffs. Our cheerleaders put up a sign on our side of the stadium with a "picture" of Briles holding a needle. The sign said "Shoot'em Up Art". When Briles came out on the field for pre-game warm up and saw the sign he was pissed. Complained to the officials and they made our cheerleaders take the sign down. 

 
Back in the 90's I lived in Sherman and we played Stephenville in the playoffs. Our cheerleaders put up a sign on our side of the stadium with a "picture" of Briles holding a needle. The sign said "Shoot'em Up Art". When Briles came out on the field for pre-game warm up and saw the sign he was pissed. Complained to the officials and they made our cheerleaders take the sign down. 
It's always interesting to hear stories from those who were opposing Stephenville in those days. Outside of Brownwood, my only connection to Stephenville's history was Stephenville itself. 

There were definitely a lot of folks who felt those teams were shooting up. Obviously, I can't say for certain either way. I can tell you that program to this day denies it vehemently. Don't get me wrong, I still root for the Jackets. But even I when looking back on the footage of those old Stephenville teams have to admit that it looks like men against boys. 

 
Baylor, Art Briles ignored responsibility in admitting Sam Ukwuachu

When Art Briles recruited Sam Ukwuachu to Baylor University, he turned every female on campus into a potential victim. When Briles' superiors signed off on bringing the talented defensive end to Waco, they tacitly approved of putting students in harm's way.

It was all right there in the most basic of investigations into Ukwuachu's exit from Boise State, when he was dismissed from the program in May 2013 because he attacked his girlfriend. Despite the clear warning signs of violent behavior, Baylor had brought Ukwuachu into their community because, by golly, he sure could help the pass rush. Five months later, all that had really changed about Ukwuachu's tendencies was the venue.

On Thursday, in a district court in Waco, Ukwuachu was found guilty of sexually assaulting a former Baylor women's soccer player, who was 18 and in her first semester of college in October 2013 when the big-shot football transfer twice her size attacked her.

Maybe if she had been warned that the Baylor football player in her tutoring sessions once became so crazed during a domestic dispute at Boise that he broke a window, she wouldn't have even been in position to be in his apartment that night. Maybe if Briles, athletics director Ian McCaw and school president Ken Starr had looked at his background and realized Ukwuachu didn't belong at Baylor, she wouldn't have had to go get a rape kit the next morning.

Ukwuachu, who is expected to be sentenced on Friday, never played a down of football for Baylor, but that really isn't the point.

Whether he played or not doesn't change the fact that he would have never been given a scholarship without a football talent so irresistible to Briles that the obvious red flags were rationalized or outright ignored.

And it's time college coaches and athletics administrators start being held accountable for recruiting decisions that put other students at risk. Is it really too much to ask the highest-paid person at a university to consider the safety of the campus community when he puts together his football roster?

There are plenty of problems with the way Baylor handled this. Its internal investigation of the rape allegation was so insufficient that the judge wouldn't allow it to be used by Ukwuachu's lawyer during the trial, according to an article in Texas Monthly. Baylor's lack of transparency about the situation and the inept performance of the local media in pursuing why Ukwuachu was suspended for the 2014 season all point to a program that was hoping it would go away.

A statement released by the university's public relations department following the verdict said: "Acts of sexual violence contradict every value Baylor University upholds as a Christian community. In recent years we have joined university efforts nationally to prevent campus violence against women and sexual assault, to actively support survivors of sexual assault with compassion and care, and to take action against perpetrators. We have established and fully staffed a Title IX office that employs a Title IX Coordinator and two full-time investigators. Maintaining a safe and caring community is central to Baylor's mission and at the heart of our commitment to our students, faculty and staff."

That sounds nice, but in reality this was an avoidable situation for Baylor. Without the cult of the coach and the mythical narrative of second chances, any legitimate, objective investigation into why Ukwuachu was thrown out of Boise State would have yielded significant enough concerns to move along to the next defensive end.

Of course mistakes happen, some of which could never be predicted. Of course there are going to be issues with a team of 18-to-22 year olds. Of course some people deserve second chances.

But the idea that football exists at a place like Baylor to harbor and rehabilitate someone with a documented history of issues like the ones that got Ukwuachu thrown out of Boise State? That's lunacy, and it shouldn't be acceptable for anyone sending a daughter to college.

Briles and his administrative enablers were willing to ignore that risk because Ukwuachu was good at football, just like Alabama's Nick Saban rationalized Jonathan Taylor's domestic violence issues at Georgia (he's since been dismissed).

They aren't the first and they won't be the last, but it's time for people who care about college football to stop absolving the Coach Almighty from their responsibility in making campuses safe for women.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/big12/2015/08/20/baylor-football-sam-ukwuachu-convicted-sex-assault/32090059/

 
A few comments. I wanted to digest everything until I passed judgement. 

1-This is disgusting. Just imagine if this happened to one of your sisters or daughters. 

2-Briles a lying bag of shit. Yes, I said it. To say he had no clue that "Ukwuachu had previous issues" is complete nonsense. Ukwuachu was an All American and dismissed from Boise State as a Freshman. Ukwuachu was one of the best young players in the country. Briles knew he had issues. I would have been willing to give Briles some sympathy if he owned up to his mistake, but he decided to flat out lie. 

3-If Baylor somehow didn't know about Ukwuachu, which is unlikely, they should have still used due diligence to investigate the matter. Ukwuachu's history seems pretty extensive, there were red flags waiting to be found if Baylor wanted to find them. 

4-If I were the victim's parents I would sue the hell out of Baylor. I see no way the school isn't liable. 

5-The fact Baylor keeps referencing Title IX tells me they know some type of federal investigation is coming. 

6-Briles should be fired. I know the cases aren't exactly similar, but after what happened with Oregon's basketball team this is a fireable offense IMO. Briles and the rest of the staff put a young female in danger because Ukwuachu is good at football. I understand that taking risky players is part of college football now, but this is an entire different level of absurdity based on Ukwuachu's history. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
A few comments. I wanted to digest everything until I passed judgement. 

1-This is disgusting. Just imagine if this happened to one of your sisters or daughters. 

2-Briles a lying bag of shit. Yes, I said it. To say he had no clue that "Ukwuachu had previous issues" is complete nonsense. Ukwuachu was an All American and dismissed from Boise State as a Freshman. Ukwuachu was one of the best young players in the country. Briles knew he had issues. I would have been willing to give Briles some sympathy if he owned up to his mistake, but he decided to flat out lie. 

3-If Baylor somehow didn't know about Ukwuachu, which is unlikely, they should have still used due diligence to investigate the matter. Ukwuachu's history seems pretty extensive, there were red flags waiting to be found if Baylor wanted to find them. 

4-If I were the victim's parents I would sue the hell out of Baylor. I seen no way the school isn't liable. 

5-The fact Baylor keeps referencing Title IX tells me they know some type of federal investigation is coming. 

6-Briles should be fired. I know the cases aren't exactly similar, but after what happened with Oregon's basketball team this is a fireable offense IMO. Briles and the rest of the staff put a young female in danger because Ukwuachu is good at football. I understand that taking risky players is part of college football now, but this is an entire different level of absurdity based on Ukwuachu's history. 
IMO, you're overreacting. UT took a risky player, Dez Harrison, among others.

Briles knew Ukwuachu had problems, but there's no evidence that Boise State ever divulged the reason (s) for his dismissal. To his credit, Ukwuachu never played a down last season while eligible because of the indictment. What else can Briles do? He's just the football coach.

I do agree that BU and Waco PD did a sloppy, half-assed job in their investigation of the sexual assualt. To your point, the victim's parents should sue BU. This shouldn't happen at a "Christian" school.

My guess is the BU administrator in charge of Title IX compliance, Beverly McCraw, will be fired for willful negligence. They need a scapegoat.

 
From Deadspin. Too bad they didn't hire someone like Kenneth Starr to check on Ukwauachu, he wouldn't stand for this. Oh wait, he's the president of Baylor. Never mind.

Baylor’s Investigation Of Sam Ukwuachu Was Shameful

As awareness has spread about rape—and pressure has increased on universities to prevent and address it among their students—two justice systems have formed. There’s the one we’ve had for centuries: the cops, the courts, and if it goes to trial, a verdict. Now there’s a second track, one where universities, under the legal weight of having to prevent sex discrimination and provide safe campuses, also investigate and render a decision.

You can see how this second system might provide some hope, with stories about our traditional criminal justice system’s failings feeling like a daily part of the news cycle. Surely universities—without the cash crunch of the legal system, but with an ideological commitment to fairness and openness and the truth—should do better. That’s why it stings so much when you learn of Baylor’s failure of an investigation into a football player accused and now convicted of sexual assault: it’s a betrayal, and not only to the victim. Baylor all but flat-out ignored evidence (which supported the woman’s story), allowed itself to consider evidence that is not allowed in Texas criminal courts (which supported the football’s player story), and in some areas just didn’t trouble itself to seek out readily available information. That’s what happens when a sexual predator can help your pass rush, I guess. And all this ineptitude would never have come to light until the McLennan County District Attorney’s Office gave a damn.

Late last night, Baylor defensive end Sam Ukwuachu was convicted of one count of sexual assault, but up until that moment Baylor hadn’t even acknowledged that it had conducted an investigation into what happened on Oct. 20, 2013. When asked why he wasn’t playing football, his defensive coordinator said he had “some issues right now and won’t practice until we get them straightened out.†Two months ago, with an indictment handed down trial looming, the same coach said they expected him back. When I called and ask Baylor last week how they handled Ukwuachu’s allegations, they told me they didn’t want to talk about it.

The Baylor Football Sexual Assault Trial You Haven't Heard About    

On Oct. 20, 2013, at 3:09 p.m., the call came to Waco police from Baylor Scott & White hospital …

Read more 

Now, with the facts laid bare in court, I can see why. The victim was a fellow Baylor student, a freshman excited to play soccer there. Within 24 hours of when she says Ukwuachu assaulted her, the woman went to a hospital, had a rape kit done, and talked to the police. She also went to Baylor administration. How did the university manage to clear Ukwuachu, who would instantly have gone back to football if not for the indictment of a grand jury?

On Wednesday Bethany McCraw, Baylor’s associate dean for student conduct administration, spoke in court, with the jurors removed but reporters still present. It was to decide how much information about Baylor’s investigation could be admissible in court. She said her investigation cleared Ukwuachu based on “a preponderance of evidence,†according to Tommy Witherspoon of the Waco Tribune-Herald. What was that evidence? Here is what McCraw said Baylor had to render its decision, as reported by Witherspoon and Texas Monthly:
·She interviewed the woman and Ukwuachu.
·She saw copies of text messages between the two of them.
·She interviewed Ukwuachu’s roommate, Peni Tagive. She didn’t say what Tagive told her, but prosecutors said the roommate had told Baylor and a grand jury that he was in bed at 12:30 a.m. and heard no calls for help that night. His story fell apart in court, where prosecutors noted that Tagive’s cell phone records showed his phone, at the time he had claimed he was home, was connecting to towers in another part of town.

·She spoke to a friend of the woman.
·She had results of a polygraph test that defense lawyer Jonathan Sibley said Ukwuachu passed. (It’s worth noting that polygraph results, with very limited exceptions, are inadmissible in Texas criminal courts, as well as several other criminal courts across the country.)

Here is what McCraw and Baylor did not have, and did not bother seeking:
·She did not have a report from the nurse who performed the sexual assault exam, which found bleeding and abrasions. McCraw said she asked the woman for a copy of her examination results, but the woman didn’t have one at that moment. McCraw made no mention, according to Witherspoon’s account of her testimony, of trying to get them from the district attorney’s office, or the clinic, or asking the woman to get a copy and give it to her.
·She did not interview a university psychologist, who testified in court about her counseling with the woman and the decision to diagnose her with PTSD. Witherspoon described McCraw’s answer to this as “Baylor officials don’t like to pry into student counseling issues, especially those that might involve mental health concerns.â€
·She did not get any records from Boise State, which dismissed Ukwuachu with very little explanation in May 2013. Ukwuachu transferred to Baylor a few weeks later, and was accused of rape in October. Witherspoon described her testimony thus: “McCraw said that records from other schools are difficult to get.â€

Those records weren’t nearly so hard for prosecutors or reporters to get. Texas Monthly’s Jessica Luther and Dan Solomon got copies, and they show plenty of reasons why Boise State might have had concerns.

In documents from May 2013 obtained by Texas Monthly, Marc Paul, the assistant athletics director at Boise State University, recounts advising to Ukwuachu’s then-girlfriend in Boise that she stay away from the house the two shared for several nights, after he put his fist through a window while drunk. Paul also makes plans for how to get police protection for the couple’s other housemate, who received threatening text messages from Ukwuachu. Handwritten notes in a document from a Boise State source also refer to times that Ukwuachu would get verbally abusive over “small irritants†like a spilled drink, and note that the woman he lived with acknowledged that she would “probably not†admit it if the abuse were physical. It ends with the words “NOT healthy relationship!†underlined.

Following the incident with the window, Ukwuachu—just a year removed from his Freshman All-American season—was kicked off the team by Boise State head coach Chris Petersen for repeated violations of team rules.

In court Thursday, the ex-girlfriend recounted being hit and punched by Ukwuachu. Perhaps if Baylor had those records, they would have reached out to her. Or perhaps they would have continued to bury their heads in the sand: Texas Monthly added that in August 2013, two months before the rape, Boise State associate AD John Cunningham told Baylor senior associate AD Chad Jackson that Boise State would not support any waivers to get Ukwuachu back on the field.

Ukwuachu was cleared by Baylor and sat his required year due to his transfer. The indictment was the only thing that kept him from returning to the field; he never played a down but remained a student and graduated. The woman, forced to rearrange her class schedule to avoid sections she shared with Ukwuachu, and suffering from PTSD, eventually found her own scholarship reduced and transferred to another school, per Texas Monthly.

On Tuesday, she recounted in detail on the stand how she screamed and yelled no during her assault. Baylor, for close to two years, merely kept its mouth shut, except for when coach Art Briles told the Tribune-Herald: “I like the way we’ve handled it as a university, an athletic department and a football program.â€

In a matter of days, close to two years of careful crisis management by Baylor has been undone. The lies told by coaches were exposed as lies. The sham investigation revealed for the piece of trash it was. The school’s motto—For Church, or Texas—appeared a cruel joke. Late Thursday, in a last-ditch effort to look like it cared, Baylor issued this statement:

Acts of sexual violence contradict every value Baylor University upholds as a caring Christian community. In recent years we have joined university efforts nationally to prevent campus violence against women and sexual assault, to actively support survivors of sexual assault with compassion and care, and to take action against perpetrators. We have established and fully staffed a Title IX office that employs a Title IX Coordinator and two full-time investigators. Maintaining a safe and caring community is central to Baylor’s mission and at the heart of our commitment to our students, faculty and staff.

This is a canned statement clearly looking forward to the lawsuits the school will likely face. Anyone expecting a better, purer form of justice in the hallowed halls of learning should know they are no safer there outside the campus gates. In some ways, that’s no surprise. I grew up in college football country, went to an SEC school, and I’d be a fool to say I didn’t know how the balance of power worked. It’s just harder to ignore now, and Baylor is the latest reminder: left to its own devices, football always wins.

http://deadspin.com/baylor-s-investigation-of-sam-ukwuachu-was-shameful-1725434717

 
Ukwuachu said Briles and Baylor knew about his issues. Someone is lying here. 

— Twitter API (@twitterapi) November 7, 2011

Problem is, you've gotta prove Briles is lying. 

Who's word and reputation is more suspect? Briles or Ukwuachu's? Just because this thug says, "Briles knew my Boise St problem" doesn't necessarily mean he does.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Problem is, you've gotta prove Briles is lying. 

Who's word and reputation is more suspect? Briles or Ukwuachu's? Just because this thug says, "Briles knew my Boise St problem" doesn't necessarily mean he does.
Ukwuachu had absolutely no reason to throw Briles/Baylor under the bus, that's the problem. This is a program that took him in when really no other program would. Why would Ukwuachu lie about that? What's the incentive?

I have no doubt, if there's an actual investigation into how Baylor handled this, that it will be shown that Briles knew about Ukwuachu's history at Boise State. 

 
Ukwuachu had absolutely no reason to throw Briles/Baylor under the bus, that's the problem. This is a program that took him in when really no other program would. Why would Ukwuachu lie about that? What's the incentive?

I have no doubt, if there's an actual investigation into how Baylor handled this, that it will be shown that Briles knew about Ukwuachu's history at Boise State. 
Ukwuachu's incentive is to continue playing CFB at a P5 school.

You're right - Briles is in trouble if there is an investigation. What did he know and when? That's why I suspect the BU administrator in charge of Title IX oversight will be canned because it was her job to fully investigate the sexual assault. Briles may be able to plead ignorance. 

 
Back
Top Bottom