Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

Rick Barnes...Point - Counter Point

beevomav

V.I.P.
Joined
Jul 12, 2011
Messages
2,956
There seems to be a war of words and it started with a Tweet. This Tweet:

Bill SimmonsVerified

‏@BillSimmons

Just watched a Rick Barnes tournament team fall way behind early, make a big comeback and blow the game in the end. What year is this?

Bill Simmons writes about basketball and he is a fan of the Boston Celtics. He seems to have a blind spot for his Celtics but any other team is fair game. This time he commented about Texas Head Coach Rick Barnes. The Point

This was quickly followed by BON and this article that I call Counter Point It's too long but I post it anyway.

January 14, 2013

Leave Rick Barnes Alone

Why Simmons Was Wrong

by C.J. Moore

Printer-

friendly

The head coach of the youngest team in the country is having a tough season. The coach's best player from a year ago declared for the NBA draft, even though there was little chance he would actually be drafted. (He's now playing in Greece.) The coach's best returning player thought about entering the draft, worked out with some guy in Cleveland, wasn't exactly clear about how he got there when he talked to his school's compliance office, and the NCAA took him away for the first 23 games of the season. The coach has had to rely on a freshman point guard who was recruited to play about 10 minutes a game this season and is now playing 36.

This team is 9-8, and has lost its first three conference games -- two in overtime. The team lost to Chaminade, a Division II school, in Maui earlier this season, yet also has a win against North Carolina. True, Carolina isn't its usual self this season, but that's still a solid win against a team that wouldn't be earmarked as underperforming if they weren't sporting Tar Heel blue.

In case you haven't solved the riddle yet, this team is Texas and the coach is Rick Barnes.

Barnes is a good coach. His record (and I'll get to that momentarily) says as much, despite what's happening this year in circumstances that would make any coach struggle. Every coach has his flaws and Barnes has a few, but his past success says he's doing something right. Yet when you say anything like this, you might as well be defending tobacco. You will get killed on Twitter.

At some point along the way, it became a thing to trash on Barnes. In 2007 Bill Simmons called Barnes "Dubya-esque" and once said "the way Rick Barnes butchers this team on a game-to-game basis is unconscionable." Simmons, a media empire unto himself, knows his hoops, and he makes a lot of great points. He fell in love with Kevin Durant in 2007, and rightly concluded that Durant was a sure thing (and that Greg Oden was not). Then he came to the conclusion that Barnes should resign.

This is when bagging on Barnes like he's some kind of trashy reality star became an accepted practice. But before you join the masses (or continue to be part of the masses), hear me out.

Barnes recruits

The go-to criticism of Barnes is, "Sure he wins, but just look at the players he's had. He doesn't win enough. Where are the Final Fours? Where's the national title?"

It's true that Barnes has had some unbelievable talent. He's coached 10 first-round picks at Texas. Two of those players, Durant and LaMarcus Aldridge, have become NBA All-Stars, and it's not too much to say that Durant was and is one of the greatest players of his generation.

Then again the team Durant played on in Austin had four freshmen and a sophomore in the starting lineup. Barnes had D.J. Augustin, a freshman, starting at point guard. Do you know how many teams have won a national title with a freshman starting at point guard since 1973 (when freshmen were first allowed to play)? Three. Kentucky last season, Syracuse in 2003 and Arizona in 1997.

Barnes has had to win with mostly young talent, and it's fair to say he has underperformed in the month that matters most in college basketball. Still, if your school had made five Sweet 16s, three Elite Eights, and one Final Four since 2002, would you be satisfied? An awful lot of fans outside places like Chapel Hill and Lexington would be.

Barnes hasn't made a Sweet 16 since 2008, but the fact that he has had to reload in recent years has played a part in that. You have to believe that when you recruit some of the best prospects in the country, you might not have them around for very long. Still, Texas has had some surprises when it comes to losing players early.

In 2008, Augustin left after his sophomore more. He was ranked as merely the No. 49 player in his class by Rivals.com coming out of high school. In 2010, Texas lost Avery Bradley, which wasn't a huge shocker since he was a top-five recruit. But the 2011 early departures, which included a few surprises, have set the Longhorns back the last two seasons. It probably didn't catch Barnes off-guard to lose Jordan Hamilton, as he was a top-10 recruit coming in. However, to lose both Tristan Thompson (ranked No. 17 by Rivals in his class) and Cory Joseph (No. 8) after their freshman seasons was not something everyone saw coming. Neither player was regarded as a certain one-and-done prospect coming in. Then last season J'Covan Brown bolted even though he wasn't expected to be drafted.

Several schools could play the "Imagine what we would be now had everyone stayed in school" card, but few can match Texas.

Should Barnes apologize for recruiting great talent? He's developed those players and helped put them in a position to leave early. Barnes deserves some credit for getting them to Texas and to the Big 12. That helps the pipeline continue, and his success in that regard is a testament to his coaching.

Barnes' teams play defense

You may think Barnes' team, the one that ranks No. 253 in offensive efficiency, is a punchline this year, but actually the Longhorns aren't nearly as bad as they could be.

Even with all that youth, the Longhorns are defending their tails off. They rank No. 12 in KenPom.com's defensive efficiency. They lead the nation in effective FG percentage defense, and have allowed only three teams all season to score more than a point per possession.

Barnes has always coached good defense. His teams have ranked in the top 50 in defensive efficiency in 10 of the last 11 seasons. In 2010-11 Barnes had the hottest team in college basketball at one point, and it was because of some unbelievable defense. The Longhorns held eight straight conference opponents to less than 0.90 points per possession. To put that in perspective, consider last year's champion Kentucky, labeled notably great defensively, held just six conference opponents below that figure in 16 SEC games.

Barnes' philosophy is pretty simple and effective. His teams want to keep opponents out of the lane and push them away from the basket. He stockpiles big men and length. This year his big men might be lacking skill -- 6-10 freshman Prince Ibeh, for example -- but they play physical D and protect the rim. Ibeh is blocking 14 percent of opposing teams' two-point attempts when he's in the game.

Many credit John Calipari for getting young players to buy into defense right away. Barnes has been accomplishing similar results in Austin.

Players thrive in Barnes' system

One of Simmons' criticisms of Barnes was that he didn't get Durant the ball enough. There may have been games where this was the case, but over the course of that season, Durant got plenty of touches. He used 32 percent of his Texas' possessions and took 34 percent of the offense's shots during his minutes. That's as close to a one-man show as you can get.

Of course, this year's team is a clear outlier on offense. Barring a miracle, the Longhorns will finish outside the top 40 in offensive efficiency for the first time in the last 11 seasons. But this season's team is also a good study in how Barnes molds his team on that end.

In 2010, Barnes spent some time studying the flex offense with former Utah Jazz coach Jerry Sloan. This season the Longhorns started off running mostly flex, and it looked uncomfortably disjointed. Many of the struggles in Maui had a lot to do with an inability to run offense with any sort of rhythm or purpose.

However, Texas has had some stretches in the last month where they at least look like they have an idea of how to score. Barnes is finding a way to put the players he has in a position to succeed. In the Big 12 opener, for example, Javan Felix had no problem penetrating Baylor's defense. It became even easier when Pierre Jackson picked up his third foul in the opening moments of the second half.

Since Jackson was having enough trouble keeping Felix out of the lane before he picked up his third foul, Barnes tried to exploit that matchup. On almost every subsequent possession, one of the Longhorn big men would set a screen for Felix near the top of the key, exploiting Baylor's poor ball-screen defense. Texas also mixed in some screens for the wings to curl off of for open looks. Most possessions featured less than one pass, but it worked. Felix ended up scoring a career-high 26 points and the Horns took a more talented Bears team to overtime on the road.

Barnes' offense hasn't always been a thing of beauty this season, but he puts his best players in position to succeed, and he's willing to adapt. Those are two attributes of a good coach.

Barnes wins consistently

In six seasons at Providence, Barnes made three NCAA tournaments. Since his departure in 1994, the Friars have made just three trips to the tourney. And in four years at Clemson, Barnes made three NCAA tournaments, including one trip to the Sweet 16. Since his departure in 1998, the Tigers have been back to the tourney just four times, never making it past the round of 32.

What if he left Texas? Would the Longhorns be better off? That's an argument that many would make, but look at what Texas was before Barnes.

When he arrived in 1998, the Longhorns had reached the Sweet 16 just twice in the previous 25 seasons. Barnes has taken all of his Texas teams to the tourney, including the first one, which won the Big 12 with seven scholarship players.

One challenge for Barnes is coaching in the same conference as one of the best programs in Division I. Bill Self, as you may have heard, has won eight straight Big 12 titles. What's often left out is that he's had to share two of those titles with Texas.

But March success, or at least reaching Final Fours, is not at the top of Barnes' resume. He hasn't been to a national semifinal since 2003. Conversely, here are the coaches who have been to two or more Final Fours in the last 11 seasons:

Mike Krzyzewski, Tom Izzo, Jim Calhoun, Roy Williams, John Calipari, Ben Howland, Bill Self, Thad Matta, Brad Stevens, and Rick Pitino.

Barnes has more wins over that time period than Howland or Calhoun, whom he led coming into this season. (He also has more wins, obviously, than Stevens, since the Butler coach didn't get started until 2008.) Barnes is just eight wins behind Izzo over that span.

The four coaches who reached the 2003 Final Four were Barnes, Williams, Jim Boeheim and Tom Crean. Only Williams has been back to the Final Four since, and Barnes has more wins than Crean. Syracuse has missed the tourney twice since 2003.

Is Boeheim incompetent for not getting Syracuse back to the Final Four when he's had two teams that were No. 1 seeds? Is Indiana doomed this year because of Crean, who has not been able to win as consistently as Barnes? You don't hear many people making those arguments.

So, if you must, go ahead and critique Barnes as a coach. That's fine. But at least admit that he's had a lot to do with the success Texas has had.

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Me, I'm Switzerland. I see the Point Simmons was making and have made the same point again and again. I also see the Counter Point Mr Moore was making although I don't think you write a novel to make the argument..

Where do you stand?

 
Good arguments on both sides and it really is the same argument you can make about Mack Brown. "If you get rid of him you better get someone that is better." Not sure we could do that now with Rick - or Mack for that matter. The basketball scene is different though. The university needs to make hoops a priority. Build a new arena and get the damn students INVOLVED. Mack won a national championship and if Rick could ring one up fairly soon he may have an extended stay in Austin.

 
I'm glad you posted this because I was actually just about to comment on this article about why I disagree with a lot in it from Mr. Moore. For starters, though I admit I havent finished all of it, I'm about half way through "The Book Of Basketball" which was written by Bill Simmons. In it he defines his "secret of basketball". To sum it up (though every basketball fan should read this book) the "secret to basketball" is not about basketball at all. It is about people getting along on a court by sharing a ball and flowing together around the court like a dance. It is about building chemistry and sacrificing for the better of the team. That is the secret of basketball.

My take on C.J. Moore's article...

"The head coach of the youngest team in the country is having a tough season."

That's very true, we should remember this team is very young. But it's not the only reason why their season has been so rough.

"Every coach has his flaws and Barnes has a few, but his past success says he's doing something right."

His success at helping develop individual players into NBA players? Definitely, he's been successful at that. But he has never had much success creating a team with the chemistry to perform well in the big dance in march. He has 0 success winning a national title.

"In 2007 Bill Simmons called Barnes "Dubya-esque" and once said "the way Rick Barnes butchers this team on a game-to-game basis is unconscionable.""

Yes, Simmons was spot on then and is spot on now. In the article Simmons posted, he went on to say this about Durant during his time at Texas "I can't handle it. Watching Texas screw up the Durant Era is like watching a guy spend three straight hours buying drinks and working it with a girl who already announced, "Sure, I'll sleep with you." In other words, WHY ARE YOU MAKING THIS HARD????? Seriously, I feel like Barnes should resign. He's overmatched. He's Dubya-esque. It's a disgrace. They're going to get bounced from the NCAA Tournament this month solely because Barnes has no idea how to get Durant the ball ... and even worse, doesn't seem to feel any pressing need to get Durant the ball."

Which was exactly what happened. Texas had the best player in the nation and got beat in the first game... If I was writing this article, I would have stayed far away from Bill Simmons' take on UT because Simmons was spot on. He was then and still is.

Moore then continues his defense by acknowledging that Texas has had great talent over the years. And I agree. But he says Durant's team was going against the odds because they had a freshman starting at PG and only three teams have ever won a title with a FR PG; last year's Kentucky team, Syracuse in 2003, and Arizona in 1997... "Then again the team Durant played on in Austin had four freshmen and a sophomore in the starting lineup. Barnes had D.J. Augustin, a freshman, starting at point guard."

Yes Moore, but do you know how many Kevin Durants their have been in the past 30+ years? Or ever? NONE. The guy was a monster in college. He averaged a double-double, and his scoring average was just over 25 points... I've seen teams with much, much less talent make it to the final four. His team didn't even make it past the first round. And from his young post-season NBA resume, we know it's not like he crumbles in playoffs... Come on now.

"Barnes has had to win with mostly young talent..."

Duh, it's college basketball. A lot of teams experience players leaving. Talk to Calipari about that.

"...and it's fair to say he has underperformed in the month that matters most in college basketball."

Which is why everyone wants to go in a new direction... Wait, aren't you supposed to be defending him?

" Still, if your school had made five Sweet 16s, three Elite Eights, and one Final Four since 2002, would you be satisfied? An awful lot of fans outside places like Chapel Hill and Lexington would be."

An awful lot of fans don't have an athletic department and expectations like The University of Texas. On top of this, Rick Barnes is also the 8th highest paid men's college basketball coach in the nation (vie Forbes: Rick Barnes - Highest Paid College Basketball Coaches - Forbes). Duke's coach is 9th. Interesting...

Moore then goes onto defend Barnes by commenting on the high level of talent he has recruited and put in the NBA... I can't disagree with that point. He has had a high level of talent that has gone onto play professional ball... So my question, why couldn't they win at Texas?

"Should Barnes apologize for recruiting great talent? He's developed those players and helped put them in a position to leave early. Barnes deserves some credit for getting them to Texas and to the Big 12. That helps the pipeline continue, and his success in that regard is a testament to his coaching."

No question Barnes has recruited great talent. And no question he has developed players to leave early. But his TEAMs havent necessarily played well together... I've always wondered how coach Barnes would do in the NBA. I honestly think he would be a great coach to have on a NBA staff in order to develop players that are still very raw when they enter the league. Seriously.

In his next section, Moore talks about Barnes' teams playing defense.

"You may think Barnes' team, the one that ranks No. 253 in offensive efficiency, is a punchline this year, but actually the Longhorns aren't nearly as bad as they could be." I guess they could be 0-16...

"Even with all that youth, the Longhorns are defending their tails off. They rank No. 12 in KenPom.com's defensive efficiency. They lead the nation in effective FG percentage defense, and have allowed only three teams all season to score more than a point per possession."

Look... I'm a big time stats junkie. I don't memorize stats over the years but I love analyzing stats in seasons, right after seasons, and using them to project future seasons... Texas may lead the nation in effective FG percentage defense. But that means didly-squat if they aren't rebounding as a team and turning that stat into a play that wins games. Plus, Iowa State just made it rain down 3's on Texas (the team that led the nation in effective FG percentage).

"Barnes has always coached good defense. His teams have ranked in the top 50 in defensive efficiency in 10 of the last 11 seasons. In 2010-11 Barnes had the hottest team in college basketball at one point, and it was because of some unbelievable defense."

I agree Barnes' teams have been better at defense than a lot of other teams in the country. But doesn't help much if the offense struggles.

"One challenge for Barnes is coaching in the same conference as one of the best programs in Division I. Bill Self, as you may have heard, has won eight straight Big 12 titles. What's often left out is that he's had to share two of those titles with Texas."

yeaaa, and it's another reason fans want to go in a new direction at HC of Bball...

"But March success, or at least reaching Final Fours, is not at the top of Barnes' resume. He hasn't been to a national semifinal since 2003. Conversely, here are the coaches who have been to two or more Final Fours in the last 11 seasons: Mike Krzyzewski, Tom Izzo, Jim Calhoun, Roy Williams, John Calipari, Ben Howland, Bill Self, Thad Matta, Brad Stevens, and Rick Pitino."

Yet another reason why fans are ready to move in a new direction...

"So, if you must, go ahead and critique Barnes as a coach. That's fine. But at least admit that he's had a lot to do with the success Texas has had."

Yes, there is no question Rick Barnes has elevated this program to a new high that it had never seen or even sniffed before. Coach barnes can recruit players. Coach Barnes can even develop the fundamentals of players. But I'm not convinced he understands how to create the chemistry and culture a college team needs to have success in the big dance. Moore states "When he arrived in 1998, the Longhorns had reached the Sweet 16 just twice in the previous 25 seasons. Barnes has taken all of his Texas teams to the tourney, including the first one, which won the Big 12 with seven scholarship players." ...And that's true. But it's one thing to get a team into the tournament. It's another thing to build a team and culture that can win in the tournament.

Tons of people bash coach Barnes without even know what they are talking about. This article did bring up a lot of great points about Barnes' ability to coach, because he isn't a bad coach. And I hope you all took the time to read this entire article. Barnes does a lot of things well. But at some point Texas must look at the ultimate goal of the program and decide if it's right. Barnes is great at developing individual players. But I'm not convinced he can develop a team into a national title contender over a season or two. I also haven't always been a fan of his offenses. Also, I think his coaching style takes longer than what he often has with his players. If he had players for 4 years I actually think he would have teams that were much better than they have performed. He tends to take players, and break them down and then build them back up (especially defensively). The problem is that college basketball doesn't often give coaches that much time with players. And coaches all over the country could also do better with teams that fielded more upperclassmen.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The university kind of screws the students over for bball games. Students shy away from going because the seats are either in the upper deck or student can buy season tickets behind the basket. I get that the university doesn't want to put the students on the side of the court because they want more money from Adult season ticket holders and Donors. But that is legitimately the price they pay. They can choose to give better seats to get money, but they will lose student fans to it. The university also reeeallllyyyy screwed over the media and their section for the same reason. Media tables used to be in a corner section of the area on the first floor. Now they are behind the basket and behind the students at the top of the first floor. Some of the worst seats in the house.

 
Wes freaking nailed it. Barnes, to me, is a prick, fans never connected with him.

Winning in March matters, and he's not getting it done

 
Wes freaking nailed it. Barnes, to me, is a prick, fans never connected with him.
Winning in March matters, and he's not getting it done
Another great point you bring up that I forgot about is the team doesn't get many fans because they don't connect with Barnes' personality. People love Mack (I know some are frustrated with him) because he has a great personality for the stage that he coaches on, that is Texas. Even Augie connects well with a lot of fans. But Barnes hasn't been the same way, which is also why fans are often quick to be frustrated with him.

 
Paradigm shift is needed for the basketball program. Plain and simple. The administration needs to understand that a family friendly environment is great, but it does not engage students nor does it intimidate opposing teams!

 
Back
Top Bottom