As the reputation of UT football took another nosedive over the last week and the positive showing of the baseball team in Omaha was completely eclipsed by the incessant bashing by the nation's sports writers, one question comes to mind. Does Steve Patterson intend on allowing Nick Voinis to remain on the payroll and thereby ensuring the continued degradation of the reputation of the football program at the University of Texas, or is there even a small chance someone competent could someday be hired to replace Nick?
People (including myself) complain about Charlie Strong's 2-13 record in head to head recruiting battles against aggy, but those numbers are downright stellar compared to Nick's performance in managing the media perception of UT compared the performance of his counterpart over at the cow college. Some of us are getting tired of the ineptitude of those managing various aspects of the program. How long is sub-mediocre going to be an acceptable job performance rating within Bellmont?
