By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!And personally I hope it happens. All of a sudden Strong hasn't discussed this with his AD, President or team, now there is a buyout concern, oh yeah let's toss in the mix the disagreement with the staff. How embarrassing that this circus is allowed to go on and on....That's very likely to happen!
Do any of the BMD's work for UT? How in anyway is Patterson beholden to people he doesn't directly work for. This scenario is like Apple execs being pissed at what the President of Microsoft is doing.So, if you hire an employee and give him a very specific directive to carry out and then he does something completely different without consulting you in your opinion that would constitute him "doing his job". I would call it grounds for termination.
How is Patterson beholden to people that do not sign his checks? Patterson works for UT not McCombs, Jamail, Hicks, or any other entitled asshole that wants to be the MAN at UT.Thank you! Some people just don't get that!
Pancho, they hired Patterson to overhaul the entire culture of the Athletics Department....and the first and BY FAR most important aspect of this is hiring a big time football coach. Patterson was told very specifically who to pursue and he went after his own guy in a panic move fearing Miami might snag him first. At the very least he needed to get sign off from the key Hiring Committee members....Hicks, Rowling, and Stillwell before pursuing his own agenda.Patterson's job revolves around more than just a football coaching hire.
If it didn't, he wouldn't have the term "Director of Athletics" on his contract.
Dude, you're a class act. How can you even attempt to say that Patterson leaked these namesThe leaking of names, Mora, Briles, etc. A new name everyday.
How can you say he didn't? Once they were out there, they stayed there.Dude, you're a class act. How can you even attempt to say that Patterson leaked these names
Let me draw a corporate analogy for you that might help put this in perspective.....Do any of the BMD's work for UT? How in anyway is Patterson beholden to people he doesn't directly work for. This scenario is like Apple execs being pissed at what the President of Microsoft is doing.
Because of every one trying to be an insider, yourself included, when you all obviously had no clue what was happening since Patterson put the lid on info. All the insiders have turned into conspiracy theorists with your laughable explanations of what transpired.How can you say he didn't? Once they were out there, they stayed there.