Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

NCAA basketball tournament

utisdabomb12

V.I.P.
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
8,338
Here's a good post from Bierce over at 247 (his post is in bold). 

I agree with him on a couple things. 1) The bubble is weak as hell. Matter of fact, the tournament participants are going to weaker than usual. It's been a weird year in basketball. Like I've been saying, after about 15 teams college basketball is a complete mess. There will be a lot of double digit loss teams in the tournament. 2) Texas hasn't even been close to the bubble yet. Our RPI is entirely too good. We don't have a bad loss and we actually have a few pretty decent wins. This can change of course, but it will take a monumental collapse by Texas to not make the tournament. There really aren't bad losses in the Big 12 (excluding Tech) and every win is an RPI boost opportunity. People get entirely too caught up in conference record, overall record, etc. The first thing the NCAA selection committee looks at is RPI. 

"It's a little early, but I have a good excuse for starting his a week earlier than I usually do, and I promised I'd start this thread today. I'll just give a quick overview of the conferences and say Texas is quite safe for now under the Pomeroy + RPI method that is a very accurate and simple to do forecast.

Syracuse recently announced a self-imposed one year post-season ban. This is the sort of thing that makes me laugh because Syracuse sucks this year, and it is imposing the ban for violations it first reported in 2007 but the ongoing investigation showed violations continuing through 2012. So. . . all those years it was good enough to make the tournament and knew it was breaking rules? Couldn't have self-imposed then, now could it? No, just wait until the chances of an NCAA bid are smaller than Orange Ethics, then "do the right thing," which by the way is something that totally screws over players who could have opted to leave the program without suffering the transfer penalty, if the ban had been announced over the summer. Imagine the impact Rakeem Christmas could have had for Michigan State or any other team with a thin and short front line. Syracuse is currently 78th in Pomeroy and 69th in rpi, and it just needed two turnovers by Va Tech in the last 26 seconds to eke out a 72-70 win at home against the 1-8 Hokies and just lost to a pretty iffy Pitt team.

Right now I'm just going to run down the conferences that have absolutely no shot at more than one team. After today's play I'll start putting together the Pomeroy + RPI list that very nearly approximates the teams that will get at large bids. As a general matter, Pomeroy + RPI of 85-95 is bubble land. Texas is very safe right now at 57. (Syracuse is 147--see what I mean about it having no chance at the tourney?)

The "Great West" conference disappeared, so all Division I basketball conferences get an auto-bid. That's 32 of the 68 spots available. I think the Ivy League is the only conference that uses the regular season to decide the auto-bid.

The one bid conferences

Thirteen conferences lack any team that could conceivably get an at large bid:

SWAC (the worst conference; Tx So beat MSU but lost to two 300+ teams) 
MEAC (NC Central is a decent team, but 0-4 against top 100) 
WAC (NM State has a single top 100 victim-#90 UTEP) 
America East (and now I'm tired of giving any details about the best team) 
Atlantic Sun 
Northeast 
Big South 
Patriot 
Summit 
Sun Belt (Ga. St. is mid 80s in both Pom/RPI but no good opponents left) 
CAA 
Ivy 
Big West


The conferences with at least one credible chance for an at large bid

Eight conferences have at least one team approaching the bubble, but the leader might or might not survive losing in conference tournament (Ga. State couldn't survive). I won't plug in numbers just yet, but Pomeroy loves SFA and rpi likes the rest. Few of these teams have chances to move up-the exceptions being teams in the Mid-American and C-USA, where there are multiple top 100 teams remaining.

Southland-SFA. Pity it didn't beat No. Iowa during the marathon. 
Big Sky--E. Wash. beat Indiana but best other win was @ 149 San Fran) 
Southern--Wofford won @NCSt but it couldn't survive a conf. tourney loss) 
Ohio Valley-Murray State 
C-USA-Old Dominion (beat VCU, LSU, Richmond), La Tech, UTEP, W. Kentucky 
Horizon-Green Bay, Valpo 
Mid-Am-Buffalo, Bowling Green, Toledo 
Metro Atlantic-Iona


Conferences with no-brainers

Eleven conferences have at least one no brainer

Big 12 
Big Ten 
ACC 
Big East 
Pac 12 
SEC 
West Coast 
A-10 
American 
Missouri Valley 
Mountain West


Assuming the 21 conferences in the first two lists above get only a total of 22 teams in (and that might be generous), that will leave 46 spots for the power 5 plus the strong mid-majors.

Here's an example of a bubble-ish team. UCLA is 43 in rpi and 51 in Pomeroy. It is 14-10, 6-5. It is 4-9 against Pomeroy top 100, 5-9 against RPI top 100. It is 3-9 in away/neutral games. It has a signature win over Utah (5, 12). It has two wins over a sliding Stanford (30, 44). It has one loss to a team 100+ (though Cal might sneak back into top 100 rpi with the win.) UCLA was in the first four out in Bracket matrix and will slide to next four out when all the brackets update with the weekend games.

St. John's is 15-8, 4-6. It is 2-4 in away games. It is 6-6 against top 100 with Providence being the closest thing to a signature win. It has two losses to teams outside the top 100. It is 40 Pomeroy, 49 RPI, and on the 11 line in the lastest Bracket Matrix.

That's how weak the bubble is."

 
Is a close loss like Iowa State looked at any differently than a blowout loss like Baylor or OU? I have been disturbed with these games we get smoked but maybe come selection time it is just about wins and losses. Appreciate the post.

 
Is a close loss like Iowa State looked at any differently than a blowout loss like Baylor or OU? I have been disturbed with these games we get smoked but maybe come selection time it is just about wins and losses. Appreciate the post.
In terms of RPI, it makes no difference. 

Maybe it's something the selection committee looks at, but there are other criteria prioritized before that. 

IMO Texas is always going to have perception in its favor come tournament time because of the Big 12. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Texas up to 21 in the KenPom. Those Iowa and Cal wins early in the year helping our RPI. 

 
The Big 12 has 7 teams in the KenPom top 25. Unreal. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So you're saying the last five weeks don't represent a "huge monumental collapse"?  The Horns have a chance to be something resembling the team we all built unreal expectations on because of pre-season hype and November? 

We still have a chance? Barnes? 

I wish I could start to care again but I've seen this play out too many years, it's a Barnes thing.

 
Texas is currently an 8 seed in Lunardi's bracket. Nowhere close to the bubble. Amazingly, Texas has a chance to work its way up to a 5 or 6 seed with how many RPI opportunities are in the Big 12. 

 
Back
Top Bottom