Is Coach Strong In Trouble??

[Sirhornsalot]

Green donkey schlong

Ok, who is the photo of?

 

[PTA]

To close out this thread

1. Doc Longhorn sources say Strong did nothing wrong

2. Texexspur sources say Strong did nothing wrong

3. Chip Brown sources say Strong did nothing wrong

4. JS/IT crawifsh and now say nothing can be proven or not sure

5. Several other posters on OB and other sites saying same Strong did nothing wrong. 

Who knows what happened but it appears that more are siding on the Strong did nothing wrong side. 

and yet so many were ready to fire him before knowing the end result.

 

[Bear19]

Ok, who is the photo of?

Zwernamenn or some spelling. The aggy douche writer.

 

[Bear19]

and yet so many were ready to fire him before knowing the end result.

No one on this board that I recall.

 

[primal defense]

Ok, who is the photo of?

 

[Cactus Jack]

Hey Sirhornsalot. Verifiable facts- you're right, only that the case is closed. Personally, I'm not pretending it's any more than that. You seem to think, at least the impression you leave with your words, is that there is something more that is not being revealed. My, strong faith in your source OL' boy. Well, so be it. You seem to be butt hurt its over. Begs the question, what would things be liked or you if you didn't have your source? What would be your identity? And, oh my goodness, what is he/she was wrong? Um, um, um, hard to even contemplate. Well, enough of this, on to more fun things. Hook'em

 

[Epictetus]

Fine math, Ricky. It's a good day to be a Horn. Just had a horrible thought. What must it be like to be an aggie? Those that remember Lil' Abner comics should remember the little character, Joe something I couldn't pronounce, that had a rain cloud over his head all the time. Must be like that.

You know, the documents -- as I understand it -- were leaked. This request should not have come out, and actions on it were to be sealed (thru some part of it at least). So... am thinking when it broke aggy went like this....

There is a God! There is a God!! Ahhheeeee.... Thank you, Lord! Thank yoouuuuu -- Lord!!!

Now THAT'S what I'm taking about!! WHO'S YOUR DADDY NOW!!

Please let it be true, oh, plz plz pleeeeeze let it be true!!!

And then... days later.... on the eve of Thur, Feb 25th.... 

Mother G-ah-...Arrrrghhhhh... I do not freaking .... you have gotttttta to be.... I'm gonna vomit....

 

[utisdabomb12]

I saw this posted on Shaggy and he's 100% right: 

The reality of PR is that Strong denying it would create an issue for the national media to report. The leaked document gave legit media very little to work with. But everybody would report "Charlie Strong vehemently denies affair with booster's wife" because what Strong says is itself a story. When you publicly deny something like that, it makes many more people aware of the story and associates you in their minds with the very act you are denying. 

You simply don't publicly deny a salacious accusation that hasn't even been made, but only hinted at. And now, barring unforseen developments, the story is likely to go away with little to no damage. And what aggy $#@!sticks say on twitter won't change that.

 

[Sirhornsalot]

Hey Sirhornsalot. Verifiable facts- you're right, only that the case is closed. Personally, I'm not pretending it's any more than that. You seem to think, at least the impression you leave with your words, is that there is something more that is not being revealed. My, strong faith in your source OL' boy. Well, so be it. You seem to be butt hurt its over. Begs the question, what would things be liked or you if you didn't have your source? What would be your identity? And, oh my goodness, what is he/she was wrong? Um, um, um, hard to even contemplate. Well, enough of this, on to more fun things. Hook'em

You could have stopped with the first sentence. It was correct and that's where my concern ends.

I don't know what you think "personally" but what you left in print told a different story. It's why I bothered quoting you. You contradict yourself without blinking an eye. 

I do not know if there's anything more that could be revealed with Charlie Strong and the Kentucky lady and I actually said so in my last post. So at this point it appears you're attempting to put thoughts into my head that I don't have. My point was what I said it was – NOTHING was verified in the way of facts, unlike what you claimed in your post. If you want to know what my thoughts are on anything particular, just ask. Speculation isn't serving you well.

Yes, I do think my source is about as inside as it gets. Whats your point? Would you feel better if I told you he was a drunk who beat his wife? WTF?

I'm not butt hurt. But running a newsroom for 17 years implanted in my head a very high regard for handling facts and truth, which is why I keep quoting your posts and actually had to produce two of your quotes in one post today because you can't remember what you post from day to day. Go figure.

What would things be like for me if I didn't have a source? LOL Maybe I wouldn't have to deal with shit like this? LOL

You see, Cactus, for a dozen years I marketed exclusively to people who were Horns. I continue to sponsor the website you're posting on right now. I imagine I have more than 60 or so Horns as customers right now in DFW and another three dozen in Austin. I know them all and enjoy their friendships (except for meeting my newest member from HS this month). A couple of them are well connected and bend my ear.

You'll notice that at the top of this board there is a landscape thread. I've been writing that thread for about 15 years now, both here and on another site. So long before I ever got pulled aside and had my ear filled, I was doing just fine. I hope this eases the bizarre concern you have for someone you've never met and likely never will.

 

[Sirhornsalot]

I saw this posted on Shaggy and he's 100% right: 

The reality of PR is that Strong denying it would create an issue for the national media to report. The leaked document gave legit media very little to work with. But everybody would report "Charlie Strong vehemently denies affair with booster's wife" because what Strong says is itself a story. When you publicly deny something like that, it makes many more people aware of the story and associates you in their minds with the very act you are denying. 

You simply don't publicly deny a salacious accusation that hasn't even been made, but only hinted at. And now, barring unforseen developments, the story is likely to go away with little to no damage. And what aggy $#@!sticks say on twitter won't change that.

Agree. At the end of the day, 100% of that is true. I'm glad its over.

You watch though. Aggy will aggy this up while trying to hit him with it. It will be ugly. It will be aggy. lol

 

[Cactus Jack]

Ride peacefully into the sunset, sir. Life is good, enjoy it. There's no point in getting yourself all twisted up. Besides, I have only a little training in psychology and am not in any way qualified to analyze your case. Hook'em

 

[dillohorn]

Cactus Jack needs to take a deep breath, calm down, and cut out the rants.  

 

[texasdalton]

He sounds like Monarch.

 

[MBHORNSFAN]

He sounds like Monarch.

Not even close. 

 

[Cactus Jack]

LMAO, got the message. 🤗 Y'all have a good day. 🤘

 

[BudreauReye]

NM

 

[BudreauReye]

Fine math, Ricky. It's a good day to be a Horn. Just had a horrible thought. What must it be like to be an aggie? Those that remember Lil' Abner comics should remember the little character, Joe something I couldn't pronounce, that had a rain cloud over his head all the time. Must be like that.

Joe Btfsplk - AKA all aggies everywhere.

 

[bcherry168]

It is time to move on. Nothing for anyone to see there. Further speculation is silly and harmful.

 

[Bear19]

It is time to move on. Nothing for anyone to see there. Further speculation is silly and harmful.

Double up click.

 

[TeamMayhall]

It is time to move on. Nothing for anyone to see there. Further speculation is silly and harmful.

Amen