A lot of people had that same attitude about our chances with Cumbie. 😎Are you seriously asking why someone (like Gilbert) would want to be OC at Texas? Versus co-OC at Tulsa?
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!A lot of people had that same attitude about our chances with Cumbie. 😎Are you seriously asking why someone (like Gilbert) would want to be OC at Texas? Versus co-OC at Tulsa?
Gilbert is so West Texas. I think high school coaches will love him. Sign me up.Get to Know - Sterlin Gilbert
Except most of the talent is in DFW, H-Town, and East TXGilbert is so West Texas. I think high school coaches will love him. Sign me up.
True, but at least he brings more Texas ties to the table than his predecessor, Watson. Sounds like his potential staff would also bring more Texas ties.Except most of the talent is in DFW, H-Town, and East TX
I prefer he brings a passing gameTrue, but at least he brings more Texas ties to the table than his predecessor, Watson. Sounds like his potential staff would also bring more Texas ties.
Lol, that would also be nice.I prefer he brings a passing game
We are only going to offer 2 years as we did with Cumbie, and if next year Gilbert and the Longhorns have a sub par performance then some of the shine could quickly fade. I agree under normal circumstances Texas is the easy choice but how many of us on this board believe that next year we will have 7 or 8 wins which I think Charlie will need to keep his job for 2017. If Gilbert is the OC we all think he is and keeps the Tulsa offense productive then he will have more job opportunities that might be more stable. That is my only point as I think any OC that comes onto the Longhorn staff now basically knows this is going to be a one year gig with a 2 year payment!I don't understand the concern about the uncertainty of Charlie Strong's future and how that uncertainty might affect our ability to hire an OC. With the mess we have on our hands at present, I can't imagine than any OC would be willing to take the Texas job without haveing a GUARANTEED 3 year deal. And I strongly suspect that's what we're offering.
Therefore, if your new hire has a 3 year contract guaranteed with compensation at 1 mill per year, and Charlie leaves at the end of the next year and the new guy gets fired with him...he walks away with his guaranteed $3 million for one year's work. Alternatively, if a new coach comes on board and wants to keep him...he get to keep on working for 1 mill per year.
Either scenario isn't bad. I don't see the problem.
Me.... but how many of us on this board believe that next year we will have 7 or 8 wins which I think Charlie will need to keep his job for 2017.
Raises hand......but how many of us on this board believe that next year we will have 7 or 8 wins which I think Charlie will need to keep his job for 2017.
I do! I actually think we'll win 8 or 9 and our bowl game. As atrocious as we are at times this year, if the ball bounces our way, we win 3 more games (Cal, OSU, and Tech). That puts us at 8 wins this year. 8-10 wins next year is not a stretch. As much as some have fussed about our defense, they played well considering how much they were on the field due to an inept offense. An improved offense will produce an even better defense. The O-line improved during the course of the year and the core of that line returns (addition by subtraction). I think we'll look very good next year. CFS isn't going anywhere...HOOK 'EM \\m//...how many of us on this board believe that next year we will have 7 or 8 wins which I think Charlie will need to keep his job for 2017.
Cal loses the player that carried their team all year. OSU doesn't like playing us when they're at home. We should best Tech next year with an improved offense. OU is always a toss up and they don't really get significantly better next year. We won't slip to ISU again. ND will be a very spirited game with us wanting revenge on our turf and Baylor will be a tough contest as usual.Cal, OSU , and Tech will be away games so not so sure on those wins, OU will be better prepared an not over look us, and Baylor will probably have a healthy QB the next go round. I do think we take Iowa but not ND.