Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

ESPN: Strong frustrated by Longhorns' Preparation

primal defense

Veteran
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
6,997
The tearing down of the signs reminds me of what DKR said, "Only angry people win football games."

Strong frustrated by Longhorns' preparation

AUSTIN, Texas -- Charlie Strong had a bad feeling about that BYU game. He’s said so repeatedly ever since. In the week leading up to his first loss at Texas, a 41-7 blowout at home, Strong says he noticed a few hints of what was coming.

One clue: The new head coach’s failed motivational ploy. He had signs put up in Texas’ locker room displaying stats from last year’s game -- like BYU’s 550 rushing yards and 679 total yards -- as a taunting reminder and a test.

"Anywhere else I would’ve been, some player would’ve ran through there, tore all that down and probably would’ve burned it in the locker room," Strong said Monday. "They would’ve done something with it, ball it up and throw it on the floor. Nobody did nothing.

"And I did it for a reason, just to see what we would do. See if somebody would just get pissed and, if somebody put it up again the next day, if somebody would walk through there and tear it down again."

It was as if he’d put a Fathead of Taysom Hill on the wall and nobody noticed.

The players, unaware of Strong’s goal, let it slide. Texas cornerback Quandre Diggs and linebacker Jordan Hicks joked Monday they didn’t like the signs, but didn’t know if yanking them down would get them in trouble.

Another clue: Strong had a sneaking suspicion his players weren’t putting in extra time in the film room.

There’s only so much that can be taught within the 20-hour confines of meetings and practice. He’d hoped players would recognize that, going into a rematch with a supposedly hated BYU team, they needed to maximize their preparation on their own time. Strong confronted this issue after the loss.

"I told them, ‘How many of you guys really came by here last week and just looked at tape?’ Not many hands were raising," he said. "Not many guys, by a show of hands. Not many at all.

"If you really want to be a good team and be a really good football player, go study the game. You don’t just walk out there on game day and be prepared like we’re just gonna go beat a really good football team -- cause it wasn’t going to happen and it did not happen."

That leads right to the biggest clue, the one Strong immediately called out after the 34-point drubbing: In the hour before the game kicked off, Strong knew something wasn’t right.

While watching pregame warm-ups, Strong turned to an assistant and said, flatly, "We’re not ready to play tonight." He wanted to blow a whistle right then and there and send his team back to the locker room, a tactic he’d used before at Louisville.

When they got back to the locker room after warm-ups, Strong said what he felt needed to be said.

"I called the team up and told them we’re not ready to play. Our focus isn’t there," Strong said in his postgame comments. "We’re getting ready to play a really good football team and we’re going to get embarrassed if we don’t watch out. That’s what happened tonight."

He could tell by the players’ demeanor, how they took the field and carried themselves. Something seemed off. He saw this back in the spring, too. When the effort wasn’t there, when the vibe was wrong, he’d blow a whistle and start practice over.

"If you’ve been around them long enough, you know," Strong said.

The concerns Strong shared Monday delve into a variety of topics -- leadership, accountability, confidence, resilience -- but his biggest concern might just be this: Where is this team’s pride?

If it sounds like Strong threw his players under the bus, he disagrees. He’s said all of this to their faces. He’s wondered aloud whether the coaches cared more about beating BYU than the players did.

"They heard it from me. They heard it from me for two to three days and they’ll continue to hear it from me," Strong said. "You just don’t walk into your stadium, with your home crowd, and get beat."

The scrutiny of Texas’ preparation couldn’t be more essential now, with a trip to Dallas to face No. 12 UCLA up next and meetings with No. 8 Baylor and No. 4 Oklahoma on the horizon.

Strong vowed he and his coaches are just as accountable for what happened against BYU. No more ignoring the clues and hints that these Longhorns aren’t ready.

"I’ll tell you right now, I’m just eaten up inside because of the performance the other night. It’s hard for me to get over it," Strong said. "I can’t let one loss beat me twice. I know at some point I have to get over it, but it’s hard for me to get over it right now.

"Because I just know this: That’s not an indication of how good this football team is and where this football team is at. We’re a much better football team than what we showed the other

http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/88970/strong-frustrated-by-longhorns-preparation

 
I know some have said it sounds like he is throwing the players under the bus, but he really isn't. He is the head coach and he knows that getting the players ready to play is his job.

He is frustrated that what he tried did not work.

It's a long road to get the whole team de-Mackafied.

 
I feel like the team could be confused in what the coaches wanted... At least that's how I see it

Coach Bedford(paraphrased): "If your looking for revenge in this BYU game then you don't even belong at UT."

Yet, Coach Strong wanted players to get angry and amped up and destroy postings from last year?

That's what it feels like, IMO.

 
I personally think those are two separate things.

You don't want revenge to be the primary motivator. However you want pride to kick in when someone is rubbing your face in an embarrassing loss. You want the players to be upset and motivated to not let something like that to happen again whether it is BYU or any other team.

 
When I first glanced at that headline, I misread it as "ESPN frustrated by Longhorns' Preparation"

And I was like, "well, I guess they do have a dog in the fight ....."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If players didn't know what the coaches wanted from them last week, I guarantee you they do now.

Like others have said, it's obviously going to take more than a Spring semester to change the mindset of a team. It may take all season.

 
So if putting up these signs was a ploy by Charlie, is putting up ropes around the Longhorn emblem/logo a ploy as well? Maybe the players should burn down those ropes.

 
mixed emotions on this. yes, there's apparently some guys who don't want it bad enough. that's what Diggs talks about. But at the end of the day. if the team isn't prepared to play, that's on the HC. it just is.

 
I personally think those are two separate things.

You don't want revenge to be the primary motivator. However you want pride to kick in when someone is rubbing your face in an embarrassing loss. You want the players to be upset and motivated to not let something like that to happen again whether it is BYU or any other team.
That's a mighty fine line and very confusing... "Use this as motivation but not revenge motivation." I think Bedford may need to quiet down a bit and let CFS say what needs to be said... IMO.

 
I feel like the team could be confused in what the coaches wanted... At least that's how I see it

Coach Bedford(paraphrased): "If your looking for revenge in this BYU game then you don't even belong at UT."

Yet, Coach Strong wanted players to get angry and amped up and destroy postings from last year?

That's what it feels like, IMO.
I agree, they might have thought they'd be faced with suspension for tearing down something the coaches put up in the locker room....

 
I am with Charlie on this.  I think I am talking to an engineer or two here, and I sometimes have difficulty getting a point across to an engineer.  We are on a different wavelength.  I'm going to attempt an analogy.

Most educators test students, not because they like to test, but because it is one of the methods used to discover how much students have learned.  Homework may or may not be completed by the student alone.  Projects may be completed with a great deal of assistance.  Tests, though not the best tool, do have some validity.

Charlie wanted to get a feel for the emotion of the team.  Would they stand and fight, or, would they just stand there and take it?  He knew the answer before we did.  Gentlemen, he has been charged with solving the problems that the Texas Longhorns have.  He can't do it without information.  He has learned more about this team in a few short months than Mack did in 16 years because he cares and because he is smart.

He has two master's degrees.  Is one of them in Sports Psychology?

Edit:  btw, I would have torn the signs down.  I wouldn't have been conflicted.  Even as a woman, I have always been an athlete, very competitive, and I can get angry.  Charlie has yet to punish anyone for standing up for what they think is right, only for breaking the core values.

Sports psychology in undervalued, and Brown's influence on this team is much more than the x's and o's.  It's the whining, the mind games, the excuses, the bs, and even the over and under-valuation (entitlement or lack of such) that he placed on individuals.  Mack was the cancer of the program for tor the last five years.  It has been removed.  We are now going through treatment.  

Quit criticizing Strong.  He knows what he is doing.  Pick up a good sports psychology book, and you may glean some understanding.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am with Charlie on this.  I think I am talking to an engineer or two here, and I sometimes have difficulty getting a point across to an engineer.  We are on a different wavelength.  I'm going to attempt an analogy.

Most educators test students, not because they like to test, but because it is one of the methods used to discover how much students have learned.  Homework may or may not be completed by the student alone.  Projects may be completed with a great deal of assistance.  Tests, though not the best tool, do have some validity.

Charlie wanted to get a feel for the emotion of the team.  Would they stand and fight, or, would they just stand there and take it?  He knew the answer before we did.  Gentlemen, he has been charged with solving the problems that the Texas Longhorns have.  He can't do it without information.  He has learned more about this team in a few short months than Mack did in 16 years because he cares and because he is smart.

He has two master's degrees.  Is one of them in Sports Psychology?

Edit:  btw, I would have torn the signs down.  I wouldn't have been conflicted.  Even as a woman, I have always been an athlete, very competitive, and I can get angry.  Charlie has yet to punish anyone for standing up for what they think is right, only for breaking the core values.

Sports psychology in undervalued, and Brown's influence on this team is much more than the x's and o's.  It's the whining, the mind games, the excuses, the bs, and even the over and under-valuation (entitlement or lack of such) that he placed on individuals.  Mack was the cancer of the program for tor the last five years.  It has been removed.  We are now going through treatment.  

Quit criticizing Strong.  He knows what he is doing.  Pick up a good sports psychology book, and you may glean some understanding.

Agree, except a better idea than reading a sports psychology book is just watch Hoosiers. When it's between the way Coach Strong wants things done and the players, I'm behind Coach Strong. He's won everywhere he's coached in college. None of our current players have won on a big level in college.

Here's a another article.

http://www.burntorangenation.com/football/2014/9/10/6128899/charlie-strong-texas-longhorns-culture-change-quandre-digs

 
Back
Top Bottom