Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

CS Meeting With Coaches Today (Personnel Changes)

1.) It’s 2015. Expectations are stupid high, and we no longer have the patience to wait for microwave popcorn let alone to rebuild a college football team.
Expectations are not "stupid high." I know few Horns fans who want more than for the team to be competitive against teams we have no business beating at this stage, to not lose against teams we have no business losing to, to win more of the toss-ups than we lose and to not have multiple humiliating losses. At this point, we are legitimately unsure how we will come out against Rice. That says a lot.

2.) People don’t like the guy that hired him..

All of the complaining and anger at Patterson would be tolerable if football was winning.
Successful organizations operate in a coordinated fashion. Leadership offers a vision, people understand their responsibilities and authorities and leadership hold team members accountable. That does not define Texas athletics. Steve Patterson has squandered an immense amount of alumni good will. Charlie Strong's struggles will be conflated with the alumni revolt against Patterson's "leadership." That, combined with an utter failure by the AD to support the head football coach has created a somewhat toxic atmosphere. It will get worse before it gets better. Charlie Strong needs to make changes, but Patterson needs to make changes, too. Patterson will never change. The toxic atmosphere isn't going to be cleansed by the football team getting turned around. The older alumni will change their habits and will not be coming back to claim season tickets if and when the football team starts winning.

3.) Hate to say this, but race.

Charlie Strong is the first black head football coach at the University of Texas, and one of the highest paid public employees in a state that sadly has some horrible details in terms of race relations. Strong getting the job is a big deal, and another sign that it’s about production more than appearance.

You have to at least ask yourself - will the power$ that be in Austin and with the program tolerate an average record from a coach they may subconsciously judge because of the color of his skin?
Wow! How does this asshat still have a job writing for a major newspaper? The short version of his statement is that UT alumni are racist and only willing to tolerate an inferior human being to have a position of leadership in the athletics program if the porch monkey dances their tune. That's not an indictment of UT alumni, that is an indictment of the Star-Telegram's sports editors.

Charlie Strong came from a mid-major program where expectations were lower, the glare of the spotlights wasn't as bright and where the competition was of a lower quality. In coming to Texas he has been burdened with an AD who is way in over his head. The media group inside Bellmont has not helped Coach Strong on his presentation before the press (a fact painfully obvious from his last two press conferences). Patterson is not avalible to play the role Jurich did while Strong was at Louisville in helping the head football coach deal with problems surrounding the program (as shown by how Wickline is being treated and how the lack of any semblance of a marketing plan has created a game day atmosphere is increasingly toxic with each game). Charlie has been thrown to the wolves by an AD who is in over his head, understands little of running a major college athletic program outside facilities construction and whose personality simply doesn't lend itself to collaborative problem solving.

The problems of the UT football program will not be solved by Coach Strong changing his OC. They will be changed by Coach Strong's entire staff making changes as well as by Steve Patterson making changes. And Patterson will never change.

Racism on the part of UT alumni isn't the problem. The problem is that UT athletics doesn't have the leadership necessary to bring the organization together to solve problems and work as a successful organization should.

 
Three realities working against Charlie Strong in Austin

By the middle of August we all should have known Texas Longhorn football was in trouble just by following Charlie Strong’s Twitter account, @Strong_TexasFB. His last post remains from July 28 with the Tweet, “Got some very exciting news for the future of the program! #LetsRideâ€

Not a word since. By that point, camp had started and Strong knew what we all saw on Saturday night in South Bend, Ind. - his team still stinks. A couple of days have passed since Year Two of the Strong Era started at Texas and Bevo and his obnoxiously wealthy friends quickly realized that their worst fears are not close to what they could have imagined.

The numbers compiled by Jimmy Burch from UT’s season-opening 38-8 loss at Notre Dame on Saturday night are depressing.

The University of Texas is the flagship school in the great state a Texas, and Strong’s team remains an expensive joke. That’s on Strong, and it’s on the guy that should never have been given the keys to UT sports - AD Steve Patterson, who hired Strong.

When Strong went with Tyrone Swoopes as his quarterback, even as a combo with redshirt freshman Jerrod Heard, he was cooked. Swoopes simply can’t play. The end. Swoopes should have been nudged to transfer at the end of last season, but the fact he is back is telling for the program, and a coach.

Theoretically, Strong should not be sweating anything as far as his status is concerned, but he has three major problems working against him:

1.) It’s 2015. Expectations are stupid high, and we no longer have the patience to wait for microwave popcorn let alone to rebuild a college football team.

Every new coach at a major program has a decreasing amount of time to turn around their respective job. Texas is viewed as one of the top five programs in the nation, because it is, meaning the coach should be able to attract anybody he wants and get it done yesterday. Even if the clock is accelerated, Strong’s team should look far better than it has shown but for a few games in his tenure.

Strong is 6-8 at UT. The Big 12 is down, but given how UT’s putrid offense looks, even in a mediocre Big 12 Bevo looks no better than an invite to the Who Gives a Crap Bowl.

If the Horns are another .500 team this season, that will mark the seventh consecutive year the Longhorns have not won at least 10 games.

2.) People don’t like the guy that hired him.

Compounding the matter is that the guy that handed Strong the job is an athletic director who operates his department like the front office of an NBA team. With more than 20 years in the front office of professional sports teams, Steve Patterson should never have been hired by Texas. College ain’t the pros.

Patterson is a capitalist to the bone; he would monetize a trip to the toilet if he thought he could get away with it. College athletics is often called the pros, but it does not function that way. If it did, it would die and he would have been fired.

People in Austin were accustomed to long time AD DeLoss Dodds, who clearly grasped the atmosphere of college athletics.

That Patterson has alienated old alums and boosters, as outlined by Chip Brown of OrangeBloods over the summer, does not make him unique. A lot of new ADs implement new programs, methods and ideas that change things, and people inherently hate change.

All of the complaining and anger at Patterson would be tolerable if football was winning. Football makes an athletic department happy. Having worked in an athletic department for five years, when football wins, everybody is in a better mood.

If football is not going to win 10 games for a while, Patterson and Strong needs friends. Mack Brown was the best “friends†coach ever created, and his AD was no slouch. Friends can buy time in college athletic departments.

Patterson isn’t making any friends, and if football loses there is no bigger enemy in Austin.

3.) Hate to say this, but race.

Charlie Strong is the first black head football coach at the University of Texas, and one of the highest paid public employees in a state that sadly has some horrible details in terms of race relations. Strong getting the job is a big deal, and another sign that it’s about production more than appearance.

You have to at least ask yourself - will the power$ that be in Austin and with the program tolerate an average record from a coach they may subconsciously judge because of the color of his skin? It wouldn’t be the first time.

The Horns host Rice on Saturday night, which assures Bevo will be 1-1 by this time next week.

Maybe then Strong will update his Twitter account with the news that is “exciting news for the future of the program!â€

The current news is awful.

Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/the-big-mac-blog/article34284792.html#storylink=cpy
I'm with Duke. This has to be one of the worst excuses for journalism that I've ever read. To top it off, the idiot who wrote it doesn't even know who Chip Brown works for. 

 
Color me extremely skeptical that any changes will be made. 

However, if changes are made, they will most likely not be "announced" especially if it involves staff. They will just be made without any fanfare. 

 
You can have Traylor call the plays and get some immediate results. The guy is an offensive genius. The only thing is he'll be working with someone else's system that he will just try to tailor to his own tastes one week at a time. By next season, we'd be a spread offense because thats what he knows. Few know it as well as he.
I said this a few months ago and got castigated by a couple of posters.

It's past time to make the change 'cuz Watson will NOT change other than to call "34-stupid-right" on 2nd and 6 instead of "34-stupid-left."

 
That offensive genius has trouble getting 11 guys on the field in South Bend. so......

 
First step to fixing the offense is to change to an OC that can design an offense that takes advantage of the players he has. Not an OC who runs a west coast offense when we should be running the spread.

Planning for success: Charlie Strong focuses on fixing offense

AUSTIN, Texas -- Charlie Strong has had more than 48 hours to ponder a tough question: What do you do when everything goes wrong in the season opener?

“You want to restart the season,†Strong said Monday.

No reset button can wipe away the Longhorns’ embarrassing 38-3 loss at No. 11 Notre Dame. That one’s going to sting for a while, and the usual coaching clichés -- can’t let one loss beat you twice, just need to execute, etc. -- aren’t going to do the trick this week.

To his credit, Strong certainly sounded pragmatic during his 30-minute press conference Monday. He knows where Texas is and where its season is heading if he doesn’t act quickly.

“We have to change,†Strong said, “and we have to get better on offense.â€

After talking up Texas’ new-look spread offense throughout the offseason, even Strong had to feel a little duped by what he saw Saturday night. His offensive line couldn’t protect. His No. 1 back got eight carries. His quarterbacks didn’t turn the ball over but didn’t do much else right. Texas gained 1.7 yards per play on second down and 1.9 yards on third. This group has made one trip to the red zone in its past three games.

The three-and-outs were just a little faster this time.

“You look at that game, and you're like, 'Wow,'†Strong said. “We said we were going to be up-tempo. There was no up-tempo. We said we were going to do this. That didn't happen.â€

But as Strong reviewed the film Sunday, a few conclusions were clear. His players competed. He says he can’t complain about their effort. He doesn’t believe the big prime-time stage and bright lights fazed them either.

So how can he put them in a better position to win? How can he set them up to succeed in the suddenly critical home opener against Rice? As much as the heat might be on offensive coordinators Shawn Watson and Joe Wickline, Strong knows his reputation is on the line as well.

“We can't go through another season with a bad offense,†he said. “No, that cannot happen.â€

So everything is up for evaluation this week. That begins with the game plan and determining what kind of offensive identity Texas actually will have in 2015.

Strong knows what he wants: “Our offense has to run through our running backs and we have to run the football.†He has the backs in Johnathan Gray, D’Onta Foreman and Chris Warren to live up to that demand. He has a line with two freshman starters that must make serious progress.

And he now has a reopened quarterback competition. After running No. 2 throughout fall camp and getting just four snaps against Notre Dame, Jerrod Heard is getting another chance. Probably because he can boost the run game.

This, like many other issues exposed by the Irish, was a decision Texas’ coaches had eight months to consider and resolve. Now, it seems, they have one week for a redo.

“Things can always get fixed,†Strong said. “It's about us just going back to work and just rolling up your sleeves and digging in. It can get fixed. We have the players to get it fixed. If you didn't have the players, you'd say, yeah, you have issues. But we can get it fixed."

http://sports.espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/114728/planning-for-success-charlie-strong-focuses-on-fixing-offense

 
FWIW, more than one of the paysites are claiming Watson called a different game than what the team had been practicing

 
That offensive genius has trouble getting 11 guys on the field in South Bend. so......

I'm not sure they needed that 11th guy. Boyd was sufficient.

Funny, Boyd was coached by Traylor throughout high school.

 
Back
Top Bottom