By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!Perhaps you can explain.....oh wait, your shortbus is leaving. Maybe next time.The substance is there. You are just too dense to see it.
No...that was your bus. Libtards have been so poor at making their points that they need to create new words to capture the sheep's attention. The first and most heinous was warfighter when Obama wanted to make soldiers, marines, sailors and airmen responsible for the premiums of their life insurance. It was an obvious attempt to create ambivalence towards the young men and women that defend our freedoms.Perhaps you can explain.....oh wait, your shortbus is leaving. Maybe next time.
Ok Pee wee herman.No...that was your bus. Libtards have been so poor at making their points that they need to create new words to capture the sheep's attention. The first and most heinous was warfighter when Obama wanted to make soldiers, marines, sailors and airmen responsible for the premiums of their life insurance. It was an obvious attempt to create ambivalence towards the young men and women that defend our freedoms.
No, its a news story from The Federalist, one of the top news organizations there is. There is no reading between the lines. And you will not be able to disprove anything you read in that story. Go ahead, try. lol You won't because you can't.A report from a trump shortbus rider...hmm. The plan may have been to clear the park but it wasn't done until after they knew trump was coming out. I know you can't read between the lines because of the shortbus thing but that means whether the report states it or not things got rolling because of barr/trump.
See we both can play the passive aggressive approach.
1 hour ago, Rotty22 said:
No you're lying. The link you provided is NOT a news story, it's an opinion piece. Hopefully, you know the difference between the two but your shortbus travels probably prohibits you from distinguishing between the two.No, its a news story from The Federalist, one of the top news organizations there is. There is no reading between the lines. And you will not be able to disprove anything you read in that story. Go ahead, try. lol You won't because you can't.
Once again, you're trying to lie. What have I done to you to make you want to lie to me? The plan was in motion and halfway completed before Trump decided to go. Do you read? I've provided two stories on this so far and you're still trying to lie your way out of it.
Lying is not what I consider passive aggressive. It's just low-rent BS done out of desperation.
2 hours ago, Rotty22 said:
Ok Pee wee herman.
Again, whataboutism.
You're talking to someone who provided you with the news for two decades. Get off your high horse. You have yet to find anything inaccurate or show where any of my links were wrong. You have still not admitted that you were wrong on this subject.No you're lying. The link you provided is NOT a news story, it's an opinion piece. Hopefully, you know the difference between the two but your shortbus travels probably prohibits you from distinguishing between the two.
2 decades and then back on the shortbus, understood. There is a difference between a news article and an opinion piece so to state that I'm wrong is just a plain shortbus lie.You're talking to someone who provided you with the news for two decades. Get off your high horse. You have yet to find anything inaccurate or show where any of my links were wrong. You have still not admitted that you were wrong on this subject.
Let me help you out – YOU WERE WRONG. Now, does anything else really matter here?
If people read you and believed you, they'd be dumber for it. Think about that. You're part of the problem.
In this case, there's really not. They are both things that you cannot dispute. There's not one thing said in the news pieces or commentary that you can dismiss as false.2 decades and then back on the shortbus, understood. There is a difference between a news article and an opinion piece so to state that I'm wrong is just a plain shortbus lie.
Perhaps you should go back to your kracken conspiracy theories.
When you want to have a real discussion we can do that or we can continue to insult each other. No problem. I can do either.
1 hour ago, TexCoyote said:
Of course you can dispute an opinion piece if the opinion is not based on fact. Although, you'd have to know the difference between reality and your shortbus world.In this case, there's really not. They are both things that you cannot dispute. There's not one thing said in the news pieces or commentary that you can dismiss as false.
Bottom Line – YOU WERE WRONG.
And I'll keep typing that as long as you keep coming back to it, pizza face.
I've never had kracken anything. Once again, you're wrong.
Most smart people won't pick a fight with a man who bought his ink by the barrel. What does that say about you? And what's this fascination you have with shortened busses? Did you have a bad experience with one growing up? lol
Of course you can dispute an opinion piece if the opinion is not based on fact. Although, you'd have to know the difference between reality and your shortbus world.
BACK TO YOUR SHORTBUS KRACKEN BOY.
Yes I can understand why you believe that opinions that aren't based on fact are real since you pushed the kracken lie. You have ZERO credibility.And obviously it was all based on fact – every single word of it – because you can't and won't dispute a single thing it said. lol
YOU WERE WRONG.
You have been spreading misinformation. You have no business telling anyone about your short bus. lol You have to be right about something to be able to say that. lol
Keep'em coming! As long as you keep responding, I'll keep rubbing your nose in it.