Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

A new era begins...with a lesson from history

hornrush

Under Contract
Joined
Oct 22, 2013
Messages
112
So, now the fun begins. Charlie Strong has made his choices for his staff and without a doubt there are Horn fans throughout the nation who have questions and doubts about this guy being chosen for this position or that guy for that coordinator role. Hell, even Strong’s choice for what he puts in his chili (beans or no beans) is liable to stir up such intense debate that he could be getting hate mail about that alone.

Welcome to 40 acres, Coach Strong.

In the midst of all of the complaining about Charlie Strong’s staff choices and the ubiquitous “Red may have been right…†and “…the BMDs are still mad…†type of postings throughout every Longhorn fan board, there seems to be something that these worry warts are missing; the team. I’m not just talking about the 80 or so 18-22 year olds that don the burnt orange every fall but the team that is being built to coach, manage, train and teach those same young men while they are stationed at the Longhorn ranch.

Some names on this staff may not be familiar to all of us and some names may cause some of our brethren to foam at the mouth and say things like, "this was the height of stupidity to choose this guy for that job." I get it. What these “rabid†folks aren't getting is that Charlie Strong is picking who works best for HIS plan, HIS goals and HIS vision. This isn't a popularity contest. If it were, Mr. Strong would still be in Louisville and we might have the most popular so-and-so coach right now instead of the right coach. If Strong chose people who, on paper, were the best choice to the media and to these so-called experts, that collection of coaches could wind up working independently and eventually against one another. Strong wants people who agree with his vision, understand their role in achieving HIS goals and care more about working together as a TEAM than as individuals trying to pad their resumes to get a better job in a couple of years. So ask yourselves, why is this so important to you, hornrush?

I’m glad you asked.

Steve Patterson was hired because he had a vision that blew away the folks making the choice for a new Athletic Director. A vision that was so antithetical to what has been in place with DeLoss Dodds and Mack Brown over the past two decades, that it persuaded those making that choice to finally start looking at Texas Athletics and especially the big three, football, basketball and baseball as programs that should be winning or contending for conference and national championships every single year. They finally found someone who believes that championships DO matter. And rest assured Patterson does have a vision. It is one that he is determined to implement and succeed regardless of who the BMDs, Exes or most rabid fans believe what names should be in what role. His first bold step? Charlie Strong. In Strong, he found someone who believes like he does that championships matter. Graduation matters. Good behavior matters. Winning the press conferences, winning the title of coach February, being the darling of the sports talk circuit or just being satisfied with playing in the same conference as Oklahoma? Those days are done. For those like me who have long waited to hear this, get ready. Texas will be the team hitting oklahoma in the mouth in Dallas from now on and the hard-hitting and toughness that were the hallmarks of the DKR years at UT are about to be revisited. The Texas-ou rivalry is about to get real and really good. Two of my better friends are former ou coaches and they both agree that the days of Stoops and Co. laughing at Texas in the Cotton Bowl are over. War has been declared, it has caught the attention of the okies and there will be blood.

Strong laid out his plan (most assuredly as he presented this to Patterson in his interview) that is making the rounds on the message boards across Longhorn nation right now. All disciplines for living and working together as a TEAM in the classroom, in the weight room, at the training table, in the dorm and on the field. There will be more plans laid out and implemented as the days and months roll along. Suffice it to say that only the strong will survive. And who doesn't want the strongest, toughest and smartest players playing for our beloved Texas Longhorns?

This new era in Texas football and athletics reminds me of a lesson from history. Indulge me for a moment.

During the Civil War, Abe Lincoln had himself a very popular general in charge of his entire army named George B. McClellan. McClellan was a great little organizer, was the darling of the press and controlling the message he wanted and had a couple of victories to keep his aura of being a “great†general intact. Lincoln’s biggest problem with McClellan was that he never could make up his mind when to fight and was never sure about how to win. Lincoln tried on numerous occasions to lay out his vision for victory but McClellan always thought he knew better.

Lincoln called in a hard-headed and hard-drinking Yankee named Grant. Now Grant wasn't much for organization nor was he interested in being the toast of DC, the darling of the know-it-all circuit or owning the press. He put men under his command that he trusted that, like him, were no favorites of the press or those power brokers back in Washington. Men like Sherman, Chamberlain and Sheridan. He surrounded himself with these like-minded men, pointed his battalions in the right direction, carried out his and Lincoln’s vision and won.

I believe Charlie Strong is going to be Steve Patterson’s Grant. He’s going to surround himself with the men he trusts, not give a damn about winning popularity contests or pissing off BMDs and he’s going to train and chisel this team into what he wants and then point them in the right direction and win.

Some of us are no longer tired of being tired. We’re relieved to be excited. We've been waiting for this type of approach since 1977. The NEW Texas Longhorn football team is coming…"and hell’s coming with them!"

Hook’em!

 
Hell, even Strong’s choice for what he puts in his chili (beans or no beans) is liable to stir up such intense debate that he could be getting hate mail about that alone.
Seriously? If you put beans in Chili it is no longer chili. I personally like to add beans to chili, but it is no longer chili. It is chili with beans.

 
I am not tired or call it beans with chili or chili no longer when it is chili......therefore Strong is Grant and OU is running scared, but OU still sucks also

 
So far, if I was asked which Texas coach of the past Charlie reminded me of, I would say DKR.

Darrell was tough and he was more concerned with victories than style points.

I hope I think of Strong the same way in 10 years.

 
A good post and all real UT fans can agree that Charlie should have their full support and should welcome the long overdue change in culture that he brings to UT. At the same time, Charlie is a defense coach who had issues with his OC in 2012 and fielded a less than exciting offense in 2013 even with a Heisman/first round draft pick caliber QB. There is no championship caliber QB at UT and the best hope is an incoming freshman. That means that the rest of the offense is going to have to play at a championship level every year until Swoopes or Heard catches up, if they ever do. It also means that UT will need a strong offensive identity to compete with the powerful offenses in the Big 12 and beyond. The offense leadership choices that Strong has made do nothing to allay concerns that we may be looking at Muschamp/UF 2.0 given the QB issues and the absence of a strong play calling profile among the offense coaches.

The concerns about offense recruiting are legitimate. Charlie coaches defense and none of his coaches on offense will have top skill position talent clamoring to come to UT in the near term. The argument that Charlie got who he wanted for his scheme are either false or reflective of a head coach who does not grasp how to hire coaches who have a successful history of running the offense that he has professed to prefer at UT. He chose an OC/play caller who has never been an OC or play caller at over 50 years of age and who has not established an identity as an innovator with a discernible passing scheme. These choices are not optimum and the circumstances leave an unnecessary cloud over the UT offense until next fall. Charlie is making a big bet rather than creating a coaching group that would excite skill position recruits and strike fear into UT adversaries.

Charlie deserves the benefit of the doubt but he clearly missed the chance to minimize the doubt from the start. Yeah, he can do that but winning championships is very difficult even when you make the best choices available.

 
So far, if I was asked which Texas coach of the past Charlie reminded me of, I would say DKR.
Darrell was tough and he was more concerned with victories than style points.

I hope I think of Strong the same way in 10 years.
Darrell Royal coached in an age with no scholarship limits and left soon after that advantage disappeared. Charlie does not have that advantage.

 
I'm a big fan of Charlie's but he's going to have to be far more of Lee than Grant (think guy who lands all the blue chippers cuz he didn't win with strategy and absorbed horrid losses).

 
I'm a big fan of Charlie's but he's going to have to be far more of Lee than Grant (think guy who lands all the blue chippers cuz he didn't win with strategy and absorbed horrid losses).
He'll be making his own way regardless of those "experts" around him deriding his choices and direction. Very much what DKR faced when he first came to UT.

Hook'em!

 
He'll be making his own way regardless of those "experts" around him deriding his choices and direction. Very much what DKR faced when he first came to UT.
Hook'em!
And DKR was more Lee than Grant too. . .it's a well done piece though I could have done without the hyperbolic trashing of Mack. . .I've been on CS' bandwagon for some time. . .

I like the fact he's not cow towing to the internet crowd or our BMDs . .. same with Patterson. . .

 
And DKR was more Lee than Grant too. . .it's a well done piece though I could have done without the hyperbolic trashing of Mack. . .I've been on CS' bandwagon for some time. . .
I like the fact he's not cow towing to the internet crowd or our BMDs . .. same with Patterson. . .
DKR came in with low expectations during his first season. He had the team ranked early, played top-ranked OU close, beat three top-15 ranked conference foes and then beat the #4 ranked aggy team. In short, DKR delivered early and went on a roll from there. If you want to start comparing Coach Strong to DKR, be prepared for others to do the same if Coach Strong doesn't deliver early and deliver big like DKR did. You can't go changing yardsticks to keep finding who you measure up to favorably.

 
Excellent and well though out read.

I think people need to realize that this ride has not even really started.

Whether you think Strong is the right guy or wrong guy for the job or that his staff choices here right or wrong, he is THE guy. I get the view points where people are debating every move he makes for better or worse. We are THOSE fans, the fanatical, the ones who over analyze every detail. Hell, I bet if we heard that that changed the flavor of Gatorade for games we would have people arguing both sides. I get it, we have a lot of fans that are passionate about the team mixed in with a handful of legitimate trolls who know how to stroke that passion into a fire.

Not matter how you look at it, Charlie is the guy and I am sure most will truly support him, even if they are not his biggest fan. In the end his legacy will be determined on the field and how well we do. I think the most positive thing we will get out of this, one what or another, is a team that is tough and no longer has that entitlement attitude that they have been infamous for. I believe we will see a team that fights for every inch and does not give up. If you want to get a little taste of that just look at our defense the last two years. Go back and watch games that Diaz coached. Just look how the defense got down on themselves and quit when things started to go bad. Then watch the defense with GR. Even when they were losing they were fighting to get the team back in position to win.

Will we win a MNC? Conference titles? Hell, 10 games? under Charlie Strong, we don't know that. We can guess, we can debate, we can project our views, but we can't know yet. All we can do is watch this new show in town after watching 16 years of re-runs (not all bad at all).

So like him or not, let's get behind our great team and Coach Strong. Let us see if he can prove himself on the biggest of stages.

 
DKR came in with low expectations during his first season. He had the team ranked early, played top-ranked OU close, beat three top-15 ranked conference foes and then beat the #4 ranked aggy team. In short, DKR delivered early and went on a roll from there. If you want to start comparing Coach Strong to DKR, be prepared for others to do the same if Coach Strong doesn't deliver early and deliver big like DKR did. You can't go changing yardsticks to keep finding who you measure up to favorably.
Why not? I see that all the time for those complaining about everything that CS does.

Not to mention just because someone says that a coaches personality and style matches up with X coach, that does not mean that they have to have the same early success for that to be a valid comparison. Especially when the variables around them are completely different.

 
DKR came in with low expectations during his first season. He had the team ranked early, played top-ranked OU close, beat three top-15 ranked conference foes and then beat the #4 ranked aggy team. In short, DKR delivered early and went on a roll from there. If you want to start comparing Coach Strong to DKR, be prepared for others to do the same if Coach Strong doesn't deliver early and deliver big like DKR did. You can't go changing yardsticks to keep finding who you measure up to favorably.
Wow. ...did you ever miss my point. . . .nor am I sure how I am "moving goalposts" (not changing yardsticks . ..yardsticks change with every 1st down. . .goalposts don't move)

Has NOTHING to do with DKR's early performance but rather with his approach . ..DKR is more Lee than Grant.. . Lee was known for great strategy (except at Gettysburg). .Grant overwhelmed with massive numbers but incurred massive losses. . .he is more akin to Larry Coker. ..yes he won the war/title but it had little to do with his inputs . .I disagreed with the analogy but understand where rush is trying to go. . .Do you understand they were opposing Generals in the Civil War?

CS is following his own path (which is part of Rush's write up) so did DKR . ..I agree. .I like it. . ..whether that translates into success for CS remains to be seen. . .

 
Wow. ...did you ever miss my point. . . .nor am I sure how I am "moving goalposts" (not changing yardsticks . ..yardsticks change with every 1st down. . .goalposts don't move)
Has NOTHING to do with DKR's early performance but rather with his approach . ..DKR is more Lee than Grant.. . Lee was known for great strategy (except at Gettysburg). .Grant overwhelmed with massive numbers but incurred massive losses. . .he is more akin to Larry Coker. ..yes he won the war/title but it had little to do with his inputs . .I disagreed with the analogy but understand where rush is trying to go. . .Do you understand they were opposing Generals in the Civil War?

CS is following his own path (which is part of Rush's write up) so did DKR . ..I agree. .I like it. . ..whether that translates into success for CS remains to be seen. . .
I'm not saying you are moving goalposts. I am saying that if you compare Coach Strong to DKR, you need to take note that DKR's actions resulted in early success that was quickly built upon. If the comparison of valid, we reasonably should expect the same early and repeated success from Coach Strong. I'm not ready to start drawing comparisons between Coach Royal and Coach Strong. I'd much rather let Coach Strong stand on his own and see where things go.

As for drawing parallels between Lee/Grant and others, the comparisons are absurd. Yes, Lincoln had McClellan, but he also had Burnside, Hooker and Meade before eventually turning to Grant. Lincoln also had Henry Halleck running much of the show and handling logistics. Patterson may have inherited Brown, just as Lincoln inherited McClellan, but if you want to draw Civil War comparisons, Strong is just as likely to be Patterson's Burnside as he is to be Patterson's Grant. Time will tell.

 
You guys who doubt Charlie Strong, what is your real reason for doubting him? Is it because you got your feeling hurt by believing internet gossip and did not get the coach you wanted. Maybe it is Charlie Strong background, his hard work, his earning everything he got? Who you think should be UT head coach is your opinion and you entitled to it. I like to think now we have our coach and he has named his staff we could get over our hurt feelings and back our coach and his staff. History is to learn from not to live in.

 
"I'd much rather let Coach Strong stand on his own and see where things go. "

Then who was using your account to complain about 90% of the process and hires, ad nausea?

 
I have never complained about the hiring of Coach Strong. In fact, I repeatedly said we have to let the man do his job. I stand by those comments. Objectively discussing the coaching staff he has assembled in no way interferes with his ability to do his job and isn't complaining. Its being objective and realistic.

If I have one complaint, it would be that the process of introducing both Steve Patterson and Coach Strong to the fans and to the alumni. I feel an opportunity was lost to have both the AD and HC set forth their intended direction for the program and to establish a set of metrics they intended to be held accountable for. Without these metrics in place, each of has has had to establish our own individual expectations. The failure to manage expectations falls directly on the media relations group and directly on Nick Voinis. I have been relentless in my complaining about his ineptitude and incompetence.

In my mind, Coach Strong should have come out and said as his first priority, he intended to instill what he believes is a culture and a set of values that puts the athletes in the best position to succeed in life. That benefiting from their time on the campus of the University of Texas meant spending time in the classroom and obtaining a degree. That he was going o hold them to a standard of personal behavior that would instill personal responsibility and be the basis of their earning personal respect, during their time in school and for long after. That he was going to instill a work ethic that those who he has coached in the past can explain. And that after that, he was going to let the results on the field be the measure of his success and that credit for on-field success would start with the athletes who we willing to put in the work and accountability for failure will start with him for not getting the team ready. Maybe this was done. If so, it must have been televised on LHN and not broadcast to most of the alumni.

Had this been done, everyone would have had a clear metric to gauge the progress of the team. What I have seen so far is Coach Strong not finding it a priority to connect with the fans or alumni and instead choosing to move ahead in his own direction and being content with allowing each of us to wonder what that direction is. We have to assume and infer. Not one of us has much of a clue as to the direction of the team other than that seems largely one dimensional, based on defense, and that we were repeatedly turned down by proven OC candidates such that Coach Strong had to cobble together a makeshift team to build some sort of offense based on whoever we get to sign as offensive recruits.

The lack of a clearly defined direction and the lack of an established connection with the fans make it difficult to give unconditional support. It's that simple. Until Coach Strong gives clarity to the direction of the team, people such as myself will be concerned until we see the results on the field and if positive results don't happen early, the doubts as to the direction he is moving will naturally intensify. It's a simple matter of establishing expectations and Steve Patterson/Coach Strong have decided to remain silent. At the end of the day, expectations were established as to the resumes of those hired as Coach Strong's staff. Those expectations were created by statements made by Steve Patterson. There is no argument that can reasonably be made that the offensive team Coach Strong assembled doesn't have a consistent record of success.

The weakness of the Patterson/Strong era appears to be that neither of them is effective at communicating through the media and managing expectations. The media team inside Bellmont is worse than inept. The humiliating comments yesterday of how the program loves the "Stronghorn" monicker is just the latest example. Neither Patterson nor Strong seem to care about managing expectations. They both seem happy to allow expectations to run wild and to let the results on the field to justify their decision. I'm fine with that, but in the mean time, no one should be surprised if some of us are scratching our heads wondering about some of the decisions that are being made. At the end of the day, wondering what the direction of the program is isn't the same as complaining, just as blindly applauding every decision that is being made isn't the same as objectively supporting the team.

 
Back
Top Bottom