ThreeKings
Rookie
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2013
- Messages
- 10
That is what is being reported on Twitter and OB
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!I honestly do not mean this to be combative, but why is this a great hire, and relative to whom?And now on SI.com. This looks like a done deal. Just a great hire by Patterson if true.
I honestly do not mean this to be combative' date=' but why is this a great hire, and relative to whom?[/quote']
I'm wondering the same thing.
I honestly do not mean this to be combative' date=' but why is this a great hire, and relative to whom?[/quote']
I think it comes down to personal preference. I for one am excited for Strong to come. Is he a big name such as Saban or Fisher? Of course not. But from everything I've heard he was chomping at the bit to become our coach, has done a great job for the cardinals, including a big BCS win over an SEC team, and that is about all I'm going off of. However, I am very excited to have his defensive mind.
Mack wasn't worth as much as Mack's salary. One of the reasons for changeSo he's not worth as much as Mack?
This is not a hire that will immediately change recruiting momentum. Maybe he will get more out of the players we currently have, which about 50 candidates out there would do. I feel a bit let down at the moment if this is true. Obviously will hope like hell it is the greatest hire ever. But less than convinced this was the best we could do. He has accomplished less than Briles. Hasn't won a conf championship in a weak conference. I don't give a crap about him not being a good interview, but why would we pay him top 10 coach money for his current résumé?