Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

2015 Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder what Marvelous Marvin thinks of all these DTs?

Most alpha dogs like him dont think that way, but 5 DTs is enough to get anyone's attention. And you know other coaches will use it with him against us.  My guess is that Charlie may call one of them (Taylor?) a DE.  Then the depth wont look quite as crazy.  But we will see

BTW, LHN will carry Charlie's full post-NSD presser, then do an hour long discussion after he is done

But, since you are here, you probably already know most everything they might say

Personally, I look forward to Higs' written tell-all
I don't think he's worried in the least, they're not all being recruited to play DT.

 
Not really. This is not my first rodeo. I don't get get caught up in internet rumors and other fake insider info. Most so called insiders are getting info 2nd or 3rd hand none are getting info directly from the person and in this case the recruit. Confirmation bias kicks in every time.
You can say that again

 
Hey sho please enlighten me how to pull a message forward and respond -- and yes your correct she says they are going to pull a guy we are fairly certain is ours - She declined to say flip bc its not someone commited
It's not Jones since they already think they have him

Daniels was just there

2 weeks ago, they had Shark, Jackson and DCG

They seem to have conceded Shark, DCG and Jackson (who is still committed to them anyway)

That leaves Daniels

And Daniels has deep family ties to Strong, so would be a bit of a surprise

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey sho please enlighten me how to pull a message forward and respond -- and yes your correct she says they are going to pull a guy we are fairly certain is ours - She declined to say flip bc its not someone commited
I've just been selecting the option Quote and respond the message that way then hit Add Reply

 
Here is how insider info should be judged

Level 1: The recruit told you personally

Level 2: The recruit told someone who told you

Level 3" The recruit told someone who told someone who told you ( Some truth with rumor and confirmation bias built in)

Level 4 The recruit told someone who told someone who told someone who told you.(Basically BS and an internet rumor)

IMO at best we are dealing with Level 3 info when recruiting news in being reported by an insider.  

 
But I can't help but to read over Higs mentioning silent commit--which makes me wonder who it is

 
Here is how insider info should be judged

Level 1: The recruit told you personally

Level 2: The recruit told someone who told you

Level 3" The recruit told someone who told someone who told you ( Some truth with rumor and confirmation bias built in)

Level 4 The recruit told someone who told someone who told someone who told you.(Basically BS and an internet rumor)

IMO at best we are dealing with Level 3 info when recruiting news in being reported by an insider.  
Man, I'm glad I read this before I posted what I heard from my Level 6, or maybe 7, source  :(

Just kidding. I don't have a source but have had a blast reading this recruiting thread. Sounding like Wednesday is going to be a good day, tator  :)

 
If you did not hear from Fowler yourself I would not believe anything. I should show you my DM's from twitter from all " I heard people" LOL...

(For the record I hope we get Fowler)
Ok. I like to think I am decent at deciphering through the BS of recruiting and I also trust the folks I talk to on this. You will never see me claiming to being an insider on these things, just passing along the info I hear.

 
Ok. I like to think I am decent at deciphering through the BS of recruiting and I also trust the folks I talk to on this. You will never see me claiming to being an insider on these things, just passing along the info I hear.
They need to start paying you, Juan,SHA for inside scoop :)

 
I dont see Juicy

Here is how insider info should be judged

Level 1: The recruit told you personally

Level 2: The recruit told someone who told you

Level 3" The recruit told someone who told someone who told you ( Some truth with rumor and confirmation bias built in)

Level 4 The recruit told someone who told someone who told someone who told you.(Basically BS and an internet rumor)

IMO at best we are dealing with Level 3 info when recruiting news in being reported by an insider.  
 
Thx sho it seens to work - I agree w my info being 3rd hand but the overall message i was trying to convey was they are fairly committed to the fact that CS is gonna kill it NSD and the few blimps on the screen seem legit and i was simple asking fir thoghts - they lose in most my scenarios - Jackson to ou jones no chance - so dont see bias on her end bc it didnt seem optomistic ðŸ˜

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom