Eastexhorn
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2015
- Messages
- 5,209
Time will tell if he plays. But to me any player worth his salt wants to play?
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!This is how I picture Eastexhorn...always counting.Now days I count the players returning instead of ones leaving.
I honestly don't knowDo you know or have an idea on whether defense will be 3-3-5 or 4-2-5 next year? Looked much better in the4-2-5 to me.
This is exactly what’s going to happen. Don’t you worry. ??I don't imagine many HS QB's will be as far a long as Arch as a freshman. I believe I read somewhere that he and Sark have been going through the offense for almost a year.
I hope he doesn't play a single snap next year. I want Ewers to light it up and be the first QB taken in the draft. Arch takes over as a RS Freshman and we never skip a beat.
2025 we start SEC play with best QB in college football and a supporting cast capable of winning a Natty.
There’s playing and there’s being ready to play. I’d imagine Manning family wants him to be ready to play which he likely won’t be next year. But maybe he knows the playbook, gets bigger physically and is mentally ready. Anything can happen but generally probably better to redshirt.Time will tell if he plays. But to me any player worth his salt wants to play?
I see what you did there, Merle.He does have a good shot. LB needs help in worse way. Also DB.
If we make it through December every thing will be alright I know.
If I'm reading this right, I think you're saying Arch will play next year unless he doesn'tNow days players leave after three years if good enough to go pro.
If a player is good enough might as well play him as freshman or you lose a year of his services.
After going through spring practices and is as good as advertized Arch will play
Then on other hand might never play a down.
TFloss, it feels like we have been interested in so many DL and have been throwing offers around. There are so many options it starts to feel like we have lowered our standards. I thought the DL improvement, Coburn's comments about Bo, and Bo's pedigree would have made us more successful. Any thoughts? Is it the depth chart?Per IT, Texas has been in contact with DL Daemian Wimberly of Austin Vandegrift since the playoffs started and they want to get him on campus for a visit.
https://247sports.com/player/daemian-wimberly-46130362/
Late bloomers and new discoveries through the season. Happens every year.TFloss, it feels like we have been interested in so many DL and have been throwing offers around. There are so many options it starts to feel like we have lowered our standards. I thought the DL improvement, Coburn's comments about Bo, and Bo's pedigree would have made us more successful. Any thoughts? Is it the depth chart?
Most of these new offers are late bloomer senior season evals, NOT UT settling for lesser recruits.TFloss, it feels like we have been interested in so many DL and have been throwing offers around. There are so many options it starts to feel like we have lowered our standards. I thought the DL improvement, Coburn's comments about Bo, and Bo's pedigree would have made us more successful. Any thoughts? Is it the depth chart?
“If we make it through December, everything’s going to be alright”He does have a good shot. LB needs help in worse way. Also DB.
If we make it through December every thing will be alright I know.
Ford probably really doesn't fall into the late bloomer category while in high school. It was more after he got to Texas. Like this year.What about Ford ?
I agree, and a lot to do with ability of our coaches to see and develop talent.Ford probably really doesn't fall into the late bloomer category while in high school. It was more after he got to Texas. Like this year.