All Things Politics Thread

[Rotty22]

LOL ???

 

[Rotty22]

 

[Rotty22]

 

[Rotty22]

 

[Rotty22]

 

[J.B. TexasEx]

 

[Sirhornsalot]

 

[Rotty22]

 

[Rotty22]

 

[UT1983]

View attachment 3239

We should all be against voter fraud regardless of political party you associate yourself with. 

 

[Rotty22]

We should all be against voter fraud regardless of political party you associate yourself with. 

Agreed.  We should all be behind the electoral college as well regardless of whether your candidate won or lost.

 

[UT1983]

Agreed.  We should all be behind the electoral college as well regardless of whether your candidate won or lost.

Absolutely.  Because the electoral college is part of our constitution for a reason.   Goes without saying electoral college votes need to be based on fraud free populous votes. 

 

[tejasrulz]

Agreed.  We should all be behind the electoral college as well regardless of whether your candidate won or lost.

Where was this quote 4 years ago? ?

IMHO both parties are corrupt, the reps a little less than the dems. 

 

[Rotty22]

Where was this quote 4 years ago? ?

IMHO both parties are corrupt, the reps a little less than the dems. 

Perhaps you should have asked 4 years ago.  My quote stands since I was eligible to vote.

 

[Sirhornsalot]

We should all be against voter fraud regardless of political party you associate yourself with. 

But as you see, some approve of it and consider it mission accomplished.

Sometimes your neighbor really is as mentally corrupt as you think he is.

 

[Sirhornsalot]

 

[Sirhornsalot]

 

[Sirhornsalot]

Perhaps you should have asked 4 years ago.  My quote stands since I was eligible to vote.

I think someone else cleaned up your quote.

The EC alone isn't the key to a successful election. If your Electoral College is dispersed according to fraudulent results, the the EC has not served its purpose. Trash-in, trash-out.

So its rich to see the very perpetrators trying to narrowly agree with the way its supposed to work, while working to defy that very process.

Corrupt. If you can't admit it, thats your issue. It is what it is and everybody sees it. The honest take exception. The corrupt cheer it on.

 

[Sirhornsalot]

Hard to believe I'm even writing this.
Rafael Warnock is a unashamed marxist running for a US Senate seat in Georgia.
A marxist, running in Deep South Georgia.
Ten years ago this would have been a pretty successful punch line to a joke.
Today, it's a toss-up.
Good people of Georgia, it's socialism/communism vs democracy. And this somehow is a tough decision for you? "Comrade" is still an ugly word when spoken with a southern drawl.
Fourty-seven times socialism has failed since the beginning of time. It has succeeded ZERO times. But this is hard to decide . . . smh
You can be the state that saved the union. Or you can be the state that doomed it.

 

[UT1983]

Where was this quote 4 years ago? ?

IMHO both parties are corrupt, the reps a little less than the dems. 

No reason four years ago.  No indication of widespread voting fraud. Counting of votes wasn’t stopped in the middle of the night with republican poll watchers sent home only to have vans show up with suitcases delivered to vote counting locations.  No widespread changing of election procedures during the election.  No mass sending out of unrequested mail in ballots.  No last minute finding and counting questionable ballots.  No having the Republican candidate having a higher percentage of minority and gay votes than the previous election and losing. No Democratic candidate winning fewer counties than Obama and winning the election. No having four or five states deciding the election with large number of over night mail in ballots that were 96% for the Democratic candidate when nearby states had no such results. 
 

Did that answer your question?