Matt Cotcher
Under Contract
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2014
- Messages
- 4,968
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!It's sounding that way more & more every day.I wonder if this becomes a moot discussion amid rumors of a 64-70 team super D 1
Taking TCU over Louisville was just weird .. . .not trying harder to nab FSU/Clemson/GT. . .equally odd. . .
What will aggie do when the SEC disbands as a football conference and is lumped into the "Southwest Pod" of the new geographic alignment?
It's sounding that way more & more every day.
What will aggie do when the SEC disbands as a football conference and is lumped into the "Southwest Pod" of the new geographic alignment?
one would have to think so.I wonder if this becomes a moot discussion amid rumors of a 64-70 team super D 1
Taking TCU over Louisville was just weird .. . .not trying harder to nab FSU/Clemson/GT. . .equally odd. . .
The president of FSU was adamantly agains FSU joining the Big 12. It was just a FSU board member that coveted the Big 12.I wonder if this becomes a moot discussion amid rumors of a 64-70 team super D 1
Taking TCU over Louisville was just weird .. . .not trying harder to nab FSU/Clemson/GT. . .equally odd. . .
The Big 12 made 220 due to the Texas brand (not recent performance), the Oklahoma brand, the Texas/OU game, Kansas basketball, and to a lesser extent, Texas basketball. Unless I'm mistaken, it's Texas and the Texas/OU pairing that carry the conference. With Texas down, it's been good to have some others step up, but they can't carry themselves, much less a conference.I do not see the Big 12 as a liability if we field a championship quality team. There are certainly a couple of weak sisters in the conference at any one time, but the "mid-level" teams can be very good. Some of the teams do play a pretty light schedule, and I would like to see them strengthened, but a few need to do that in order to have a chance at bowl eligibility. Tech comes to mind as one that is good enough to strengthen its schedule some. Kansas and Iowa State cannot and will not.
Everyone that wants to bad mouth the Big 12 needs to understand that the league made $220 million last year. That is a darned good per team number. So they must be doing something right.
No other team should be added that cannot add enough to the pie that the rest of the teams don't have to take a cut. That means there will be no expansion, IMHO.
so, spill it. why the mystery ?The president of FSU was adamantly agains FSU joining the Big 12. It was just a FSU board member that coveted the Big 12.
Clemson never was campaigning for the Big 12. That was an internet rumor that simply got legs - nobody knows why.
There are, infact, a couple of teams that would definetly entertain an invitation to join the Big 12 - and, no, I'm not talking about BYU. You would be shocked to hear who one of them is and it's not on the east coast, either.
LOL! Java I must apologize to the board for throwing out that openly "look at me" teaser.The Big 12 made 220 due to the Texas brand (not recent performance), the Oklahoma brand, the Texas/OU game, Kansas basketball, and to a lesser extent, Texas basketball. Unless I'm mistaken, it's Texas and the Texas/OU pairing that carry the conference. With Texas down, it's been good to have some others step up, but they can't carry themselves, much less a conference.
With the working theory above, there is no one to add, except Notre Dame, that is a value add. Court cases haven't been decided, etc. You have to know when to hold 'em, and know when to fold 'em. Right now it's time to hold.