By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!Damn I’m oldTexas hasn't beaten a top 5 team at home since 1999 beating #3 Nebraska under Mack, Major and Hodges Mitchell.
Based on their career records, both Dykes and Sark have average W-L records ?Losing at home to an average career first year coach would a bad look for Sark... This is the type of game he needs to show he is the one.. If not just more evidence that we are wasting our time with him.
I love @MBHORNSFAN but the lingo he used was just there to support his point.Based on their career records, both Dykes and Sark have average W-L records ?
And I'm with you on needing to see more evidence from Sark although I'll wait until the season is complete.
What is most interesting to me is that there is absolutely nothing in Sonny Dyke's previous coaching history that indicated that he would have this kind of success.I love @MBHORNSFAN but the lingo he used was just there to support his point.
The coach he tried to play down has taken a team that was picked 6th in the conference and has them undefeated and likely to win the conference regular season. He's viewed as one of the best HCs in the nation right now.
But look at where he's been. Not exactly bastions of success.What is most interesting to me is that there is absolutely nothing in Sonny Dyke's previous coaching history that indicated that he would have this kind of success.
In 11 previous seasons as a HC, he posted a losing record in 5 of them. And he had won 10 games in a season exactly once. Which is also the number of times he lost 11 games in a season. This is his 12th year as a head coach and he didn't even move above .500 until his 9th season in which he went 10-3. And that only put him at 56-55 after 9 full seasons as a HC.
Most shocking thing to me. Didn't have any idea it was that bad. Clock management is terrible and correctable.T.O.P. 116
Clock management has been quite good actually. Look at how we have ended the first half of every game so far. Except WVU we have scored (or attempted a FG) after running the clock basically all the way down. The clock hasn't been an issue at the end of the game in any losses.Most shocking thing to me. Didn't have any idea it was that bad. Clock management is terrible and correctable.
The final possession last week that required a strip sack to hold on never happens if we burn clock properly during our 5 possessions.Clock management has been quite good actually. Look at how we have ended the first half of every game so far. Except WVU we have scored (or attempted a FG) after running the clock basically all the way down. The clock hasn't been an issue at the end of the game in any losses.
The TOP problem is two fold. One thing, we move fast and score fast on offense. Two, our inability to sustain drives in the 2nd half.
TOP can also be misleading. Like I said, we score fast. Look at the WVU game, they had a 4:30 edge in TOP but only because they went on two ridiculously long scoring drives despite being down big.
So you think we start running clock from the start of the 3rd qtr? That is not how this offense operates, and going that slow isn't going to help the 2nd half offense struggles. Gotta keep running the offense the same way we do in the first half.The final possession last week that required a strip sack to hold on never happens if we burn clock properly during our 5 possessions.
Snapping with 15-20 seconds left on the play clock, running out of bounds and more.