utisdabomb12
V.I.P.
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2013
- Messages
- 8,338
http://www.freep.com/story/sports/college/michigan-state/spartans/2015/03/12/michigan-state-kevin-pauga/70194756/
This article gives you some insight into what data points are used by the committee to determine seeds. Essentially they compare the RPI top 100, the KPI, Sagarin, Pomeroy, BPI and LRMC rankings.
Texas
RPI: 42
KPI: 39
Sagarin: 21
Kenpom: 19
BPI: 25
LRMC: 21
Average = 27.83. Which puts us on the 7 seed line if that data = discussion points for the committee. Do I think we finish with a 7 seed, hell no. But the data that the committee uses is really skewed in our advantage for some reason.
I actually had a good conversation with Kevin Pauga (the guy that came up with KPI). Something that's a huge myth, and something I didn't know, is that the committee does not A) Look at conference record. B )Does not look how you finish (they look at the entire resume). Other factors come into play like RPI top 50 wins, road record, top 100 losses, etc but not those two criteria.
This article gives you some insight into what data points are used by the committee to determine seeds. Essentially they compare the RPI top 100, the KPI, Sagarin, Pomeroy, BPI and LRMC rankings.
Texas
RPI: 42
KPI: 39
Sagarin: 21
Kenpom: 19
BPI: 25
LRMC: 21
Average = 27.83. Which puts us on the 7 seed line if that data = discussion points for the committee. Do I think we finish with a 7 seed, hell no. But the data that the committee uses is really skewed in our advantage for some reason.
I actually had a good conversation with Kevin Pauga (the guy that came up with KPI). Something that's a huge myth, and something I didn't know, is that the committee does not A) Look at conference record. B )Does not look how you finish (they look at the entire resume). Other factors come into play like RPI top 50 wins, road record, top 100 losses, etc but not those two criteria.
Last edited by a moderator: