Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

My observations of the West Virginia Game

Joined
Oct 14, 2013
Messages
163
Y'all-

I have to admit, I thought we would come out sluggish, waller thru the muck of a night game at West Virginia and their raucous fans, and eek out a game at the end. Well we did just that BUT we lost 2 key players while doing it. Nevertheless, give these players and coaches their due- they are a gutty group and they seemed destined to not be denied. We'll sure find out this up-coming Saturday against Okie State in Austin when we step-up a weight class in opponent (but keep in mind, WVU handed Okie State their first loss of the season in Morgantown!). Is an OT victory against a Team that is not even .500 and is 2-5 a great achievement for a team that consists of 4* & 5* players throughout the lineup a major accomplishment? Ordinarily no but with the way this season has twisted and turned, losing key personnel during the game and earlier throughout the year, then YES! This is a big accomplishment! At the end of the day we are 7-2 and 6-0 in Big 12 play. Did ANY of you out there after the ole Miss game think we would be 7-2 at this point of the season? I didn't! Do I think Mack has "righted the ship" and deserves to come back in '14? REALLY?!

On to observations:

1. Case McCoy may look awkward at QB. The guy's skill set and mechanics at this level are questionable at best however the kid has his Big Brother's Football Mind. Case is like the dorky kid that doesn't know he's a dork- he aint afraid to go up and ask the Head Cheerleader to go to Prom with him. You HAVE to love a kid with balls like that! GOD BLESS THAT KID! He is a freaking "gunslinger" with a "Devil May Care Attitude!" Something I was describing Kliff Kingsbury's QB's as having 3 weeks earlier. Case McCoy stood in there and made plays at critical junctures of the game! McCoy FINALLY had passing stats that looked like his older brother's last night (283 YDS, 3 TD's, & just 1 INT) The 1 INT came early in the game. During the 2nd half, McCoy was nails and he delivered last night in crunch time- BIG TIME!

2. As good as our defense was in the 1st half they were suspect AT BEST in the 2nd half. Despite getting 5 turnovers last night, I think I counted the defense giving up 9 explosive plays- what is up with that? Nevertheless, at the end of the game when they needed to show up in OT, they showed up and flexed their muscle and got us the "W" in OT.

3. Our offensive line struggled at times in the running game but we still amassed 435 yards in total offense (283 passing, 152 rushing).

4. Last night, Craig Way said that our receivers put the team on their collective shoulders and led us to victory- I COULD NOT AGREE MORE. The timely catches by Mike Davis and Shipley were game savers. Davis' TD catch came at just the right time to keep us in the game. His later catch when he got blasted afterwards was GUTTY! Davis ended up with 3 catches for 91 yards and 1 TD. Jaxson Shipley's timely key catches helped salvage our Big 12 Championship hopes. Shipley was just nails all night long winding up with 7 catches for 82 yards and his first TD of the season. If I am Nick Saban or Art Briles or Urban Meyer or whoever, Darrell Wyatt is the ONE coach I retain on my staff.

5. Even with 435 yards of total offense, I am STILL not convinced that Major is comfortable calling plays early-on in a game. How in the Hell we walk away with just 6 points when having the ball spotted inside the 10 yard line not once but twice because of timely turnovers by our defense is just unacceptable. Imagine how much of a let-down that is to the defense when they go out and do their job and the only thing you can repay them with is with a minimal 3 points for each turnover? That is disheartening and UNACCEPTABLE! To his credit, Major sure came on when it became a shoot-out and he HAD to throw the ball. With Case becoming more comfortable (and effective) throwing the ball down the field, I think we need to open things up more early-on in a game which makes things easier to run the ball early-on as well. Like everyone else, Major is progressing at his job as well. For a guy that is auditioning for his next gig, e will find out over the next 3 weeks how far he has progressed.

6. Mack just seems comfortable in his skin. Even on the sideline he looks comfortable and enjoying the moment. After carefully watching Mack Brown over the past 15 season, he looks to me like a man that realizes that he is on his way out and retiring at the end of the season. Mack seems to just be taking it all in and simply enjoying the ride while it is still going on. If that is the case, I sure hope he enjoys every moment of his coaching career winding down. On the flip side, IF he has delusions of grandeur then.. Well then that's another story altogether!

7. Why do we seem to ALWAYS come out flat in games and have to sustain the blows of what our opposition does and then adjust accordingly? Why we don't come out and impose our will on our opposition from the opening kick is beyond me. I do realize that there is more importance on QB talent and play more than in any other time in the History of Football. Much of the blame lies with the play of Case McCoy. Rarely does the guy come out on fire. Contrast that with Johnny Football. Say what you want but that kid comes to ball EVERY week! Nevertheless, even with Vince. Even with Colt. Even with Simms. We ALWAYS seem to see what the opposing defense was going to give us instead of just going out there and imposing our will.

8. I know I am speaking the obvious but we sure need Johnathan Gray and Chris Whaley back before this final 3 game gauntlet.

9. Steve Edmond is really coming along as a LB. Sure, he had some tough moments. But he had some key, great moments as well.

10. Why we have a full time TE's Coach yet we don't have a full time Special Teams' Coach is beyond me. I know I've said this several times before but I sure hope our next HC hires a FULL TIME Special Teams' Coach.

11. Major sure looks annoyed or put-out in these post game interviews. Taking an antagonstic approach with the media is a losing proposition with the media.

12. Cedric Reed & Jackson Jeffcoat working together as a tandem will be missed next season. Those guys and just wreaking havoc at the Defensive End position.

13. I really like Greg Robinson at DC. Yes we did have some defensive let-downs but the guy gives credit where credit is due to the opposition. He admits where his squad messed-up. He is a grown man and in contrast to Major, he handles the post game questions by the media in a professional, mature manner.

14. Dana Holgerson does NOT have the brand that I would want the University of Texas to be associated with. I realize he is a young, bright, offensive mind but in contrast his disheveled appearance is much like that of a drunk that just came off of a 3 day binge. I would want NO part of it as a University and knowing what I know of Holgerson, I have to question Oliver Luck's decision-making in hiring Luck as HC. That would have been a "red flag" for me if I was on the AD Selection Committee.

15. This may upset Nick, but one of the houses Terry was looking at recently was a friend of mine's home in Austin. Asking price: $6.5M 8,000 sq ft pad.

16. Fair or not, Will Muschamp is in a World of Hurt right now. Injuries or not, after 3 seasons Foley has some decisions to make. Wouldn't that be neat to see WM reunited with his mentor NS is Austin of all places?

17. Muschamp or not, Derek Mason is my choice for next DC at the 40 Acres. What that guy is doing with the talent he has at Stanford is just incredible. Once those guys hit you they stick. There are no broken tackles with that squad!

18. Saban may be upset with Tom & Steve Hicks BUT that doesn't change the dynamics of Saban's financial opportunities should he come to Austin to finish his coaching career. I would expect Steve Patterson to now be the intermediary between BMD's and Sexton/Saban going forward and for things to get DRAMATICALLY quieter than before. As a matter of fact, this is COMPLETE speculation on my part however despite everything that Mack has said about Nick and not wanting Saban to win with Mack's players, I think at the end of the day Mack be a good soldier. I think Mack will work in tandem with the transition of Saban to Austin to be much like that of one President from a previous administration (same party or not) bringing the President-Elect up to speed on outstanding issues facing the Nation. I am sure at the end of the day, for $2.75M Brown would play nicely with Saban.

19. If I am looking for a Head Coach and Saban balks or becomes too much a prima donna, I would NOT hesitate to throw my hat in the Art Briles & Kevin Sumlin sweepstakes. Both of those guys would be a HUGE improvement over what we have today. Sumlin can freaking flat-out recruit but keep in mind the program Sumlin took over at UH was built brick by brick by Art Briles. Either one is a HR. Whoever it is, this guy needs to "hit the ground running." We have lost a LOT of ground in Texas to schools from the SEC- we have to do this thing right and there is not a doubt in my mind that we will. Nice little run by Mack's squad and all but at the end of the day our program is sitting in the same place that it was earlier in the season. Our program has little "juice" with recruits right now. The ONLY thing that can change that is a massive overall beginning at the top and that means MACK BROWN!

20. I LOVE seeing TCU struggle like they have in the Big 12. I like seeing West Virginia struggle like they have in the Big 12. For years these lightweights have been the "media darlings" and I absolutely LOVE seeing them being exposed for the frauds that they are/were. On the flip side, it shows you that we surely didn't upgrade our conference by bringing these turds into the Conference when replacing Aggy, Nebraska, Mizzou, & CU. I really wonder with a new regime running the AD, combined with IMG, LHN, & ESPN responsibilities how much longer we can continue to be part of this Conference.

That's all I got for now. Last night was one of the best games that I've seen this season. This was a GUTTY performance by our guys but at the end of the day. There is NO DOUBT that this was a game that will be remembered for years to come and how we hung around and pulled the game out in OT in the end! It was a CLUTCH performance in a HOSTILE environment. It was US against the World! That being said, is that really the type of performance we should expect from one of the most highly paid staff's in the Nation with a roster comprised of 4* & 5* recruits when going against a program with 2* & 3* recruits and a limited budget for coaching staff? Probably not.

Hook 'em!

SG

 
Last edited by a moderator:
15. This may upset Nick, but one of the houses Terry was looking at recently was a friend of mine's home in Austin. Asking price: $6.5M 8,000 sq ft pad.

interesting

 
15. This may upset Nick, but one of the houses Terry was looking at recently was a friend of mine's home in Austin. Asking price: $6.5M 8,000 sq ft pad.
interesting
Yes.......if true very interesting indeed....

 
As far as Saban being upset and I might be in the minority but I'm not so sure he cares one bit about all the noise about his interest in Texas. As a matter of fact he might just be laughing at it all. JMO

 
Didn't ESPN pay for LHN to keep us from leaving the Big12 and to avoid massive conference realignment? Per #7, I do think we came out and imposed our will on OU this year. Probably one of the only times I've seen us do it and literally outcoach the opposition as well.

 
Another perspective on last night's game. (FWIW!)

1. Isn't it interesting that Mack Brown's team are always the ones that have to "withstand the surge" at the beginning of each game? There's more to that, and those who coach and have coached for many years know of what I speak, but there's a difference between withstanding the surge and coming out and punching someone in the mouth. So, let's move on to Number 2.

2. This team found a way to win last night. They didn't fold or give up and that's a very good thing. I'm proud of them for that but let's face some facts. UT's offense left a lot of points on the field in the first half last night. and this game should have been over by halftime.

3. Th OLine was not very good last night, especially in the run game. 2.6 average yards per carry for the first 3 quarters. Let that sink in for a second. 2.6 yards average. This after jamming it down KSU and ou's throat. It was frustrating to watch, especially the guy that I have defended for 3.5 years, Mason Walters. His leg strength is just pitiful.

4. Daje was off last night in nearly every aspect of his game. Everyone has a bad game but if this team has any hope of winning the next three games, this Daje better not show up. We're going to need the Daje that holds on to the ball and streaks through a crack and is 10 yards downfield before the defense realizes it.

5. Case is Case. Yes the kid was a gamer in the 2nd half but my God, he left 3 TDs on the field last night in the red zone because he doesn't have the tools that an Ash wouuld have. We put 21 on the board there, we break WVU's back right then and there and the game is over. His Houdini act I think is about to come to an end with these next 3 games.

6. Defense played well but the big play killed them. oSu's receivers are going to carve up this secondary if they're left man-to-man.

7. Edmond's play on the last two plays made everyone happy but he and Santos had a rough game prior to that. in spots, Edmond is getting better. Santos probably had his worst game since BYU. He was caught out of position a lot and even Robinson was chewing his ass and telling him that. I realize his pass coverage is not his strength but his contain and squaring up the ball-carrier on running plays, normally his strength, was weak at best last night. Edmond still guesses too much. When he guesses right, he looks good. When he doesn't, he's chasing the ball carrier down the field or watching the play go into the area where he was supposed to stick. Both players are getting better but last night they both took a step back for 90% of the game.

8. Jackson Jeffcoat gets tired and takes plays off. And in my best Chris Rock, "...that's right, I said it!" I'm not sure if he has a future in the NFL but his motor doesn't last long and that's going to have to change if he wants to earn a paycheck in the NFL. When he and Reed were rested and charging hard, they looked great. But when Jeffcoat is dancing with a guy for 5 plays after embarrassing the same guy for two plays in a row, well...

9. One kickoff out of the end zone last night? Is Nick Rose hurt? They gotta fix that. Same for Fera's punting. Especially next week against okie light.

No, I don't think this team is going to beat okie state. At least not the team that was on field last against WVA. It's a shame that Robinson wasn't here at the beginning and an even bigger shame that Ash is out. I really feel that this team would be set up for an unbeaten showdown with the Bears right about now if those two things were different. Ifs and butts, right?

Hook'em!

 
11. I'm not over crazy about Major's play calling.....run some zone read as a change of pace

4. Agree on Wyatt, I like Porter as well

17. Really like D.Mason

19. Any updates on J. Adams?

 
I want start by saying I think Shipley is fantastic, but he dropped two TD passes. I can't blame Case for that.

 
I'm not sure Briles has the personality to deal with the alumni at Texas. If he is a likable guy he hides it well.

As for Sumlin, No! No! and HELL NO! The guy has used his total unwillingness to hold players accountable for off field transgressions as a recruiting tool and that is the LAST type of coach we want at Texas. Even fighting the AD at every turn not to suspend players, he still ended up with one of every 10 scholarship players unable to set foot on the field at the start of the season. Against quality competition (Fla, LSU, Bama in 2012 and Bama, Aub in 2013) he is a whopping 1-4. We don't need character risks and we don't need a coach who doesn't win big games.

 
i dont give a shit about the coaches personality. Mack has a good personality and good relations and look where that has gotten us. I want the coach to come in and do his job, win games, period.

 
i dont give a $#@! about the coaches personality. Mack has a good personality and good relations and look where that has gotten us. I want the coach to come in and do his job, win games, period.
Since Mack has come in, he has won more games than any other FBS coach, he has had a Heisman winner, won a MNC, played for another and barely missed out on a third chance. He is the only coach in that time with at least 9 10+ win seasons. Has taken the team to 14 bowl games in 15 years and has kept the program away from scandal. I absolutely believe he needs to stap aside because the game has passed him by, buy I would no sooner shit on what Mack has accomplished than I would the accomplishments of Tom Landry or Darrell Royal.

The claim that Mack has accomplished nothing and has driven the program into the dirt is crap. I haven't seen Briles or Sumlin accomplish more than Mack. They are on a better trajectory, but together they have zero conference championships and zero appearances in MNC games. I certainly don't want an arrogant jackass as the public face of the university. I don't want a coach who doesn't care about character. Darrell Royal quit coaching a 52 saying that if he couldn't win without cheating, he would rather walk away.

I want a coach that represents the university in a favorable light and knows how to field a winning team. I'm not willing to sacrifice one for the other.

 
Who is your short list of candidates who are both:

* Corporate ass kissers

* Winning Football Coaches

 
Since Mack has come in, he has won more games than any other FBS coach, he has had a Heisman winner, won a MNC, played for another and barely missed out on a third chance. He is the only coach in that time with at least 9 10+ win seasons. Has taken the team to 14 bowl games in 15 years and has kept the program away from scandal. I absolutely believe he needs to stap aside because the game has passed him by, buy I would no sooner $#@! on what Mack has accomplished than I would the accomplishments of Tom Landry or Darrell Royal.
The claim that Mack has accomplished nothing and has driven the program into the dirt is crap. I haven't seen Briles or Sumlin accomplish more than Mack. They are on a better trajectory, but together they have zero conference championships and zero appearances in MNC games. I certainly don't want an arrogant jackass as the public face of the university. I don't want a coach who doesn't care about character. Darrell Royal quit coaching a 52 saying that if he couldn't win without cheating, he would rather walk away.

I want a coach that represents the university in a favorable light and knows how to field a winning team. I'm not willing to sacrifice one for the other.

Nobody is saying Mack hasnt accomplished anything. Mack HAS been a great coach for Texas and has done great things and woke up a sleeping giant. But we are sleeping again and that also is because of Mack. I am giving him all the credit and now i am taking it away also. Not bc I want to but bc he didnt leave when he should have and still isn't. You dont have to have Mack's personality to have a favorable light. A coach's job is to win football games. It doesnt mean he has to be rude or super friendly either. Be a decent human and do your job. He has to be cordial to the BMD, thats it. Winning will take care of the rest.

Briles and Sumlin combined havent coached as much as Mack and while we are comparing coaches why not add someone else we want, Saban and see where Mack stacks up. Or how about Stoops.

A good comparison would be Bowden and unfortunately their career endings might end the same way. What Briles has done at Bu can probably compare to what other coaches have done at bigger schools but that is a whole different topic. Briles hasnt brought scandal to Bu and Saban hasnt to Bama or Lsu and Stoops hasnt to Ou. Sumlin, well that is a different story.

Bottom line: I will take the personality of a Briles, a Saban, a Shaw, a Stoops as long as they do what they are well paid to do. And with more inside and interviews, maybe even a Sumlin.

 
Since Mack has come in, he has won more games than any other FBS coach, he has had a Heisman winner, won a MNC, played for another and barely missed out on a third chance. He is the only coach in that time with at least 9 10+ win seasons. Has taken the team to 14 bowl games in 15 years and has kept the program away from scandal. I absolutely believe he needs to stap aside because the game has passed him by, buy I would no sooner $#@! on what Mack has accomplished than I would the accomplishments of Tom Landry or Darrell Royal.
The claim that Mack has accomplished nothing and has driven the program into the dirt is crap. I haven't seen Briles or Sumlin accomplish more than Mack. They are on a better trajectory, but together they have zero conference championships and zero appearances in MNC games. I certainly don't want an arrogant jackass as the public face of the university. I don't want a coach who doesn't care about character. Darrell Royal quit coaching a 52 saying that if he couldn't win without cheating, he would rather walk away.

I want a coach that represents the university in a favorable light and knows how to field a winning team. I'm not willing to sacrifice one for the other.

No one in their right mind believes that Mack has done nothing. I say we treat him like he has treated his coaches and coordinators the last 4 years...fire his ass. He has killed what he has built. Luck has smiled on him this year...big 12 sucks and the dominos have fallen his way since Ole Miss

 
Luck has smiled on him this year...big 12 sucks and the dominos have fallen his way since Ole Miss
haha, maybe figuratively and literally. first by the way this team has caught a few breaks and weak schedule and the second because Oliver had a bit of a smile rather than an ax when he interviewed.

 
Since Mack has come in, he has won more games than any other FBS coach, he has had a Heisman winner, won a MNC, played for another and barely missed out on a third chance. He is the only coach in that time with at least 9 10+ win seasons. Has taken the team to 14 bowl games in 15 years and has kept the program away from scandal. I absolutely believe he needs to stap aside because the game has passed him by, buy I would no sooner $#@! on what Mack has accomplished than I would the accomplishments of Tom Landry or Darrell Royal.
The claim that Mack has accomplished nothing and has driven the program into the dirt is crap. I haven't seen Briles or Sumlin accomplish more than Mack. They are on a better trajectory, but together they have zero conference championships and zero appearances in MNC games. I certainly don't want an arrogant jackass as the public face of the university. I don't want a coach who doesn't care about character. Darrell Royal quit coaching a 52 saying that if he couldn't win without cheating, he would rather walk away.

I want a coach that represents the university in a favorable light and knows how to field a winning team. I'm not willing to sacrifice one for the other.
The bottom line on Mack is that he is not a championship coach unless he simultaneously has a transcendent QB and excellent DC who can overwhelm his major coaching deficiencies. Maybe you think that 2 championships at UT is okay in 16 years but would you have hired Mack in the first place if you had known that he would only deliver championships at a 12.5% rate while OU was winning 4+x that many championships? Would you have hired him knowing that he would deliver epic beat downs from OU 25% of the time? Mack has had access to superior talent, facilities, resources and his pick of assistants at UT and he has not delivered championships at anywhere near the pace that reflects his enormous advantages over his competition. MACK HAS ONLY ONE MORE BIG 12 CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIP THAN AGGY DURING HIS TENURE AT UT AND ALMOST MISSED THE SECOND ONE BY ONE SECOND. THINK ABOUT THAT REALITY FOR A MOMENT. He has also been an abject failure in his graduation rates for his players vs other schools despite unlimited education support resources.

Are gladhanding, happy talk, "integrity" and spinning endless excuses for missing out on championships really the measure of your aspirations for UT? If so, Mack is your man but please spare us the criticism of the many UT fans who think that winning championships is very important. Every UT fan wants their head coach to operate a clean program but that should be a minimum standard not a reason to ignore a head coach's championship performance. If Mack does not miraculously win out in 2013, he will have missed his own phony "10 win" standard 4 years in a row. The game has passed him by. He cannot effectively evaluate and develop players and coaches. He is losing the recruiting game and may be about to lose to Baylor 3 out of 4 years. It is long past time for Mack to go.

 
The bottom line on Mack is that he is not a championship coach unless he simultaneously has a transcendent QB and excellent DC who can overwhelm his major coaching deficiencies. Maybe you think that 2 championships at UT is okay in 16 years but would you have hired Mack in the first place if you had known that he would only deliver championships at a 12.5% rate while OU was winning 4+x that many championships? Would you have hired him knowing that he would deliver epic beat downs from OU 25% of the time? Mack has had access to superior talent, facilities, resources and his pick of assistants at UT and he has not delivered championships at anywhere near the pace that reflects his enormous advantages over his competition. MACK HAS ONLY ONE MORE BIG 12 CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIP THAN AGGY DURING HIS TENURE AT UT AND ALMOST MISSED THE SECOND ONE BY ONE SECOND. THINK ABOUT THAT REALITY FOR A MOMENT. He has also been an abject failure in his graduation rates for his players vs other schools despite unlimited education support resources.
Are gladhanding, happy talk, "integrity" and spinning endless excuses for missing out on championships really the measure of your aspirations for UT? If so, Mack is your man but please spare us the criticism of the many UT fans who think that winning championships is very important. Every UT fan wants their head coach to operate a clean program but that should be a minimum standard not a reason to ignore a head coach's championship performance. If Mack does not miraculously win out in 2013, he will have missed his own phony "10 win" standard 4 years in a row. The game has passed him by. He cannot effectively evaluate and develop players and coaches. He is losing the recruiting game and may be about to lose to Baylor 3 out of 4 years. It is long past time for Mack to go.
I think this take summarizes Mack's tenure (including all of it, not just omitting his last several years) pretty well. He had a great run from '04-09, there's no dispute on that. Unfortunately, as this post above reminds, he's had a whole lot of shortcomings.

As to his "winning with integrity," as a whole, he hasn't done enough of the former (winning really big, like conf titles and performing well against our biggest rival). And when he really did (2005), it came with a whole lot of baggage. Did some of us forget the great number of arrests and moments of embarrassment the program dealt with as negative events came out one after another?

Mack resolved the character and legal issues by taking a lot of "choir boy" types--kids who were really nice kids, not enough of an edge on the football field. We got by for awhile with Colt's otherworldly heroics and some good defense (Muschamp), but when the all-time winningest QB departed, all the holes that had been developing under Mack's watch were exposed.

DKR warned Mack after the national title to guard against complacency, because it would be a real temptation to fall into that. Mack may have listened to Royal on some things, but he sure failed to on that critical component. Eventually, it cost him and created the need to totally rebuild the program. Bob Stoops takes a year, generally, to "rebuild," then proceeds to win the conference. Mack, in contrast, requires three or four years, which is pretty inexcusable, especially when you barely win 40% of your games against your rival and win your conference obviously far, far less.

Mack has had a really good run, and it ended before this decade began. He may inevitably have a good year this one, but that's the least we could expect of a guy requiring that long to rebuild, having the most experienced team in the nation, and having the conference opponents be generally down and inexperienced in the same year.

He requires way too many things to line up just right for a HC in charge of a program like Texas. It doesn't recruit itself as automatically as some would state, but it darn sure shouldn't be a place that requires so much to be perfect in order to have a conference title season.

 
I think the answer to your #11 is that he is an arrogant prick.

 
I think this take summarizes Mack's tenure (including all of it, not just omitting his last several years) pretty well. He had a great run from '04-09, there's no dispute on that. Unfortunately, as this post above reminds, he's had a whole lot of shortcomings.
As to his "winning with integrity," as a whole, he hasn't done enough of the former (winning really big, like conf titles and performing well against our biggest rival). And when he really did (2005), it came with a whole lot of baggage. Did some of us forget the great number of arrests and moments of embarrassment the program dealt with as negative events came out one after another?

Mack resolved the character and legal issues by taking a lot of "choir boy" types--kids who were really nice kids, not enough of an edge on the football field. We got by for awhile with Colt's otherworldly heroics and some good defense (Muschamp), but when the all-time winningest QB departed, all the holes that had been developing under Mack's watch were exposed.

DKR warned Mack after the national title to guard against complacency, because it would be a real temptation to fall into that. Mack may have listened to Royal on some things, but he sure failed to on that critical component. Eventually, it cost him and created the need to totally rebuild the program. Bob Stoops takes a year, generally, to "rebuild," then proceeds to win the conference. Mack, in contrast, requires three or four years, which is pretty inexcusable, especially when you barely win 40% of your games against your rival and win your conference obviously far, far less.

Mack has had a really good run, and it ended before this decade began. He may inevitably have a good year this one, but that's the least we could expect of a guy requiring that long to rebuild, having the most experienced team in the nation, and having the conference opponents be generally down and inexperienced in the same year.

He requires way too many things to line up just right for a HC in charge of a program like Texas. It doesn't recruit itself as automatically as some would state, but it darn sure shouldn't be a place that requires so much to be perfect in order to have a conference title season.
I agree with every bit of what you wrote.

 
Back
Top Bottom