Brasky
V.I.P.
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2013
- Messages
- 740
Yep, I think I do.
He definitely had his limitations but his quarterbacks were effective and so was the ofense when he was able to find a groove (granted, he wasn't always able to find a groove). I've heard the arguemnt that he gets no credit for Vince because he just let Vince be Vince (which seems to me to have been a brilliant piece of coaching, even though I don't buy it). Colt was what, a 2* that bumped up to 3*? Goes and wins 45 games with 70 some odd completion %. Applewhite, Simms were solid and the backup situation was always good outside of Gilbert.
I'm not forgetting how frustrating he could be but he's a lot better than what we've had since.
He definitely had his limitations but his quarterbacks were effective and so was the ofense when he was able to find a groove (granted, he wasn't always able to find a groove). I've heard the arguemnt that he gets no credit for Vince because he just let Vince be Vince (which seems to me to have been a brilliant piece of coaching, even though I don't buy it). Colt was what, a 2* that bumped up to 3*? Goes and wins 45 games with 70 some odd completion %. Applewhite, Simms were solid and the backup situation was always good outside of Gilbert.
I'm not forgetting how frustrating he could be but he's a lot better than what we've had since.