Welcome to the HornSports Forum

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.

SignUp Now!

Does Shark toss the playbook in the trash after 2 games?

We could be a Big 12 contender. What we have called recruiting wins in years past meant nothing. Until we go SEC we won't see the real recruits, and I suspect you have to pay to get them to play.
Yeah.  But the payment now is legal (NIL) and obligatory.  Probably a reason for the move to the SEC.  

 
It's obvious this is supposed to be Bijan's team. I don't expect that to change against Rice.  I'm not sure he's even our best Robinson? At this point Casey is our most effective run weapon. I don't see Shark turning him loose, I expect the same 3rd down passing opportunities and expect him to be handcuffed against running, keep your eye's upfield stuff.

We have been exposed at the O line and D line, and every team is going to follow the Arky game plan now.

Stick with the plan, or learn to improv vs. TCU?
Starting with the title of the thread....this is a ridiculous assertion. The first step is to try and improve production from the most important position on the field. When that sucks as bad as it did Saturday, NOTHING is going to click offensively. Bijan looked all world the first game.....against a good veteran defense. Hell....he had to be nearly all world to even get out of the backfield last week.

Think what you will, but I am going to trust Sark to find a way to work ourselves out of this problem.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah.  But the payment now is legal (NIL) and obligatory.  Probably a reason for the move to the SEC.  
 Yep, but don't expect kids to round up their own deals. Car dealers and the like will need to be lined up by the alum's.

 
By naming Thompson the starter he is not going to be able to run much of his offense that got him hired here.  Sadly this very well could hurt the Arch recruitment. Thompson is just not suited to run the full Sark offense.... We have some major issues to figure out.
Good God Mike. Did you even watch the game?

It doesn't matter who the QB is – the OL will not allow Sark's offense to be run. Sark's offense is not taking a snap and running for your life. But thats exactly what both QBs have to do.

I'll invite you to tell the world what part of Sark's offense cannot be run by Thompson. Running like you're in mud is not a requirement for Sark's offense. Being able to both pass and run is not something that scares or bothers anyone. I mean, just lol.

IMO, Arch has every right to be turned off by our idea of protection. But your idea that Thompson playing will drive off Arch is about the dumbest thing I've heard today – and thats after reading some of Depp's stuff. lol

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good God Mike. Did you even watch the game?

It doesn't matter who the QB is – the OL will not allow Sark's offense to be run. Sark's offense is not taking a snap and running for your life. But thats exactly what both QBs have to do.

I'll invite you to tell the world what part of Sark's offense cannot be run by Thompson. Running like you're in mud is not a requirement for Sark's offense. Being able to both pass and run is not something that scares or bothers anyone. I mean, just lol.

IMO, Arch has every right to be turned off by our idea of protection. But your idea that Thompson playing will drive off Arch is about the dumbest thing I've heard today – and thats after reading some of Depp's stuff. lol
 Sounds like 1 vote for throwing the playbook in the trash?

 
Well I think we have our answer. BIG changes to the playbook, and very effective ones. 

 
a simple change in the playbook is what allowed us to run wild?....who knew? So....without that change we still would have had 4 linemen blocking the same guy? Thank God we discovered that in time!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom