You could have stopped after the first fifteen words (it's close enough anyways).  That has been my main point this entire time - you essentially guaranty that the TM will be invalidated due to fraud without having any knowledge or understanding of how that would actually take place.  A...

Randolph, you still haven't demonstrated specifically how the TM would be lost.  All you say is that the story is false and aggie lied.  Again, granting all of that to be true, you have not shown in any way whatsoever how that has any impact on the TM.  Constantly saying "fraud" is not enough...

I'm not at all concerned, as already explained in my second post.  I know that any effort to enlighten him is futile, and I wouldn't dare try to change Mr. Duke - I like him just the way he is.  Some other posters, however, seemed to ask genuine questions so I thought I'd give an actual answer...

So you are still going to ignore what is actually required to show fraud? "How can we assume the ags didn't know the true history of their school when they constantly make it clear it is expected of every single aggy to know the history of their school?" You can't assume that.  Problem is...

So the short answer to my first question is "no." I tried to give you some friendly advice regarding ceasing the hyperbole so you can gain in the credibility department.  If you simply made the case that aggies didn't know their history or even were dumb for not knowing the details of E King...

Damn it, I have work to do but you keep one upping yourself . . . Can you please elaborate on how the Constitution was violated in any of this?  How did TAMU's USPTO application (even if fraudulent) constitute constitutional violation?  How did Judge Lake make a mockery of the Constitution? ...

Again, what was Judge Lake supposed to do?  Serious question.  The case settled and the complaint was never challenged.  You think he should sua sponte enter sanctions?  Honestly? Of all the ridiculous things you say, your tirades against Judge Lake are some of the most ridiculous.  You are...

As opposed to . . . you? Frankly, I don't care very much if you listen to what I say and fully expected that you would do exactly what you did - stick your fingers in your ears and ignore anything that doesn't fit your narrative.  I only dropped in because there seemed to be some people asking...

Last thing I'll add is that the attacks on Judge Lake's character and credibility are unwarranted.  Attack the aggies generally or the 12th man stakeholders all you want, but this perceived slight from Judge Lake makes no sense.  Randolph keeps saying that he picked his alma mater over...

The short answer is there are no ramifications.  Assuming he is 100%, it will not make a difference.  Although our esteemed colleague likes to use the word "fraud," he is failing to realize that such word has a precise legal definition and necessary elements.  Even if Randolph is 100% correct...