**Running College Football Updates Thread**

[TFloss32]

 

[TFloss32]

 

[TXFF]

Seems like you are arguing. If encryption is done correctly, it can't be broken, at least with today's computer technology. Since as you say it's unlikely they would try the point is moot... so I'm not sure what your point is, but at any rate hookem horns.

Not talking about breaking the encryption. Referring to methods that could pick up the audio at one end or the other. But I agree, it's moot because no one in their right mind would try it. But then again, we are talking college football so who knows.

 

[TFloss32]

 

[TexCoyote]

Manny is getting killed for that take.

Yeah I know he’s a Longhorn but I’m not a huge Manny fan as a commentator

 

[Hiwood]

the Big 10 sound like our Congress, you show them evidence of corruptness and they do absolutely NOTHING.the Big 10 wont take action and is undefeated because there is way too much money on the line

 

[TFloss32]

I love Kiffin trolling the Ags and Jimbo.

 

[TFloss32]

 

[TFloss32]

 

[Hiwood]

the way things are going he may have his choice of Michigan or Michigan State with a few more major programs at his feet, Maybe even USC ?

 

[TFloss32]

 

[dssl]

Not talking about breaking the encryption. Referring to methods that could pick up the audio at one end or the other. But I agree, it's moot because no one in their right mind would try it. But then again, we are talking college football so who knows.

I misread 2 posts ago.

Again adding a wireless communication between the signal caller and a player doesn't open up any new opportunity to intercept the signal, he either sends it to the person relaying it, or he could communicate directly, either way the same opportunity exist to pick up the voice.

Again I don't understand what your point is. In your world of future technology that is likely impossible to do, particularly in real time, that you don't think will be deployed.

 

[TFloss32]

 

[dssl]

I misread 2 posts ago.

Again adding a wireless communication between the signal caller and a player doesn't open up any new opportunity to intercept the signal, he either sends it to the person relaying it, or he could communicate directly, either way the same opportunity exist to pick up the voice.

Again I don't understand what your point is. In your world of future technology that is likely impossible to do, particularly in real time, that you don't think will be deployed.

This discussion reminds me of the get smart cone of silence

 

[Eastexhorn]

Does not matter to me but on encription hacking is possible just ask the sat. companies or iptvproviders.Much more money at stake than a football game.Dish and Dirict get hacked all the time.

 

[TFloss32]

 

[dssl]

Does not matter to me but on encription hacking is possible just ask the sat. companies or iptvproviders.Much more money at stake than a football game.Dish and Dirict get hacked all the time.

Totally different then a secure encrypted communication channel.

 

[Eastexhorn]

Totally different then a secure encrypted communication channel.

I belive satellite to a set top box is a example of a secure commo. chanell. At least it gets goverment involved if you are caught. Descrambling is what it is tv or football. But doubt if China is interested in football hacklng not enough money.

 

[TFloss32]

Lubbock, man.

 

[63_Texas_1]

I belive satellite to a set top box is a example of a secure commo. chanell. At least it gets goverment involved if you are caught. Descrambling is what it is tv or football. But doubt if China is interested in football hacklng not enough money.

That may be a relevant observation about not enough money. Aggy paid Jimbo a basket full of money and gave him a national championship trophy with year to be named later.