Soldierhorn
Rookie
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2013
- Messages
- 1,589
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our Texas Longhorns message board community.
SignUp Now!14 hours ago, Rotty22 said:
4 hours ago, drgilbert said:
Is this our next pandemic
Uh, this wasn't directed to you. Did you even read who it was directed to?Uh, that has nothing to do with what I said. Did you even read that?
3 hours ago, Rotty22 said:
My apologies, I see that you were responding to DrGUh, this wasn't directed to you. Did you even read who it was directed to?
4 hours ago, Rotty22 said:
They've released the kracken with more nonsense ??
My apologies, I see that you were responding to DrG
However, I had to look to see my mistake. And in doing so, I noticed you failed to stay on topic in that situation, too.
He spoke of moves made outside the legislature, illegally. You responded with laws that were passed, none of which had anything at all to do with what he was talking about.
lol
This is what the kracken stated. ""it should be that he can simply be reinstated, that a new Inauguration Day is set."It is interesting . . .no, outright hilarious that some moron entitled this "Fact Check" when he has no basis to say she is wrong on anything.
He's throwing popcorn from the cheap seats, about as useful as a turd on the bottom of your shoe.
No MSM source on planet Earth is qualified to say the election was not rigged. Every time we attempt to see – they SPEND MILLIONS trying to stop it.
Its not just that they're morons, its that they're dishonest morons. And morons just eat that stuff up.
I agree with you that I don't think Trump could be reinstated. But its probably not right for me to say what won't happen since I have no idea what would happen. That would be unchartered territory for me and perhaps best addressed a by real historian.This is what the kracken stated. ""it should be that he can simply be reinstated, that a new Inauguration Day is set."
The facts are, he cannot be reinstated and a new inauguration day cannot be set. Not without amendments anyways. However, the key words in the kracken's statement are "it should be that". So the kracken didn't state that "he can be reinstated" but only "it should be that". By why even make that statement in front of qnuts. That's how insurrections happen.
Again, there was no widespread fraud in the election and any MSM outlet that states that is a credible source. Lawsuits were filed, audits were done, results were certified and no widespread fraud has been uncovered. Even the kracken who was pushing the Big Lie is backtracking by stating in her defense that "no reasonable" person etc.
My bad if I wasn’t specific enough. I was testing a margarita recipe that day and might have sampled too many. I can’t find the links, but what I was trying to say was there were multiple states that wanted to change their laws in regards to voting and the legislature said no. They went ahead and implemented them anyway. I believe it had to do with mail in ballots, drop boxes and the time it would take to count the votes. There might have been others as well. If the state implemented these new laws without the consent of the legislature then those votes are fraudulent and shouldn’t have been counted. So at the end of the day on the 3rd when Trump was up by 10’s of thousands of votes the counting should have ended and he would still be president.Yes, I was responding to DRG.
Again, you'll have to go back and read that yes my response was on topic because the response presented by DRG was extremely vague. He did NOT clearly state "moves made outside the legislature". You interpreted that way. He stated "The legislators never passed the laws." I merely provided a link to laws that were passed by legislatures which not only contradicts his statement but proves it incorrect.
Now if he wants to be more specific, which is what I asked for in the first place, then we can address his complaint.